USPTO Examiner TSEHAYE REBECCA - Art Unit 2932

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
30010006VAPING CARTRIDGEJune 2025October 2025Allow410NoNo
30004867Torch LighterMay 2025January 2026Allow800NoNo
30004820Electric SmokerMay 2025December 2025Allow700NoNo
30004470POWER SUPPLY FOR ELECTRONIC ATOMIZING DEVICEMay 2025January 2026Allow800NoNo
30000245Electronic atomizing deviceApril 2025December 2025Allow800NoNo
29994196LIGHTERMarch 2025December 2025Allow910NoNo
29985081LighterJanuary 2025October 2025Allow900NoNo
29984501Cigarette CaseJanuary 2025October 2025Allow1000NoNo
29975191ELECTRONIC ATOMIZING DEVICE ASSEMBLYNovember 2024December 2025Allow1300NoNo
29973638Vaporizer DeviceNovember 2024September 2025Allow1000NoNo
35522812Part For Electronic Cigarette AssemblyOctober 2024November 2025Allow1200NoNo
29959089ELECTRONIC ATOMIZATION DEVICEAugust 2024December 2025Allow1520NoNo
29950788Electronic atomizing deviceJuly 2024December 2025Allow1810NoNo
29949743AEROSOL GENERATORJune 2024November 2025Allow1610NoNo
29948668VAPE PENJune 2024November 2025Allow1710NoNo
29943490SNUFFBOXMay 2024October 2025Allow1700NoNo
29939615Electronic Vaporizer AssemblyApril 2024October 2025Allow1700NoNo
35521829Electronic cigarette atomizerMarch 2024October 2025Allow1911NoNo
35521986Electronic cigarette atomizerMarch 2024November 2025Allow1911NoNo
29929866Electronic CigaretteFebruary 2024September 2025Allow1910NoNo
29929872Electronic CigaretteFebruary 2024September 2025Allow1910NoNo
29907078ELECTRONIC ATOMIZING DEVICEJanuary 2024November 2025Allow2301NoNo
29922621TIP FOR WRAPPING PAPERDecember 2023December 2025Allow2410NoNo
29900905ELECTRONIC ATOMIZING DEVICEAugust 2023November 2025Allow2701NoNo
29900909BATTERY FOR ELECTRONIC ATOMIZING DEVICEAugust 2023October 2025Allow2610NoNo
29900902OIL BOTTLE FOR ELECTRONIC ATOMIZING DEVICEAugust 2023November 2025Allow2601NoNo
29910762AEROSOL GENERATION DEVICEAugust 2023October 2025Allow2610NoNo
29900695ELECTRONIC ATOMIZING DEVICEAugust 2023November 2025Allow2701NoNo
29867668Electronic CigaretteNovember 2022September 2025Allow3401NoNo
29799598ACCESSORY FOR A HOOKAH BOWLJuly 2021December 2025Allow5321NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner TSEHAYE, REBECCA - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner TSEHAYE, REBECCA works in Art Unit 2932 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 53 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner TSEHAYE, REBECCA's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 98% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by TSEHAYE, REBECCA receive 2.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 51% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by TSEHAYE, REBECCA is 53 months. This places the examiner in the 3% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 100.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 99% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 31% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 34% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.