USPTO Examiner PAUL SANJEEV - Art Unit 2932

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
35524794Eyewear accessoryApril 2025March 2026Allow1101NoNo
35524711EyeglassesMarch 2025February 2026Allow1000NoNo
29985012GogglesJanuary 2025January 2026Allow1200NoNo
29976819DIVING GOGGLESDecember 2024January 2026Allow1300NoNo
35523688MattressNovember 2024January 2026Allow1100NoNo
35523675MattressNovember 2024January 2026Allow1100NoNo
29945820Air BedJune 2024December 2025Allow1900NoNo
35523484mattress connector and a mattress bridgeMay 2024October 2025Allow1000NoNo
29944110Air Seat CushionMay 2024December 2025Allow1900NoNo
29940914SWIMMING GOGGLESMay 2024January 2026Allow2000NoNo
29938058EyewearApril 2024November 2025Allow1900NoNo
29935281SunglassesApril 2024November 2025Allow1900NoNo
29907126PillowJanuary 2024October 2025Allow2100NoNo
29923343Pregnancy PillowDecember 2023October 2025Allow2200NoNo
29922354ARM SLEEVE PILLOWDecember 2023October 2025Allow2200NoNo
29919565PILLOWDecember 2023October 2025Allow2200NoNo
29901600Nursing pillowSeptember 2023October 2025Allow2600NoNo
29910584SEAT CUSHION FOR SHOPPING CARTAugust 2023October 2025Allow2600NoNo
29899917MattressAugust 2023November 2025Allow2700NoNo
29899099MATTRESS CUSHIONAugust 2023November 2025Allow2800NoNo
29896386DIVING MASKJuly 2023January 2026Allow3000NoNo
29895991LEG CUSHIONJune 2023November 2025Allow2800NoNo
29894392Tummy Time Mat and Seated Support PillowJune 2023November 2025Allow2900NoNo
29893891DISPLAY UNITJune 2023November 2025Allow2910NoNo
29876988INFLATABLE MATTRESSMay 2023October 2025Allow2801NoNo
29838683Foldable Orthopedic Seat CushionMay 2022June 2025Abandon3700NoNo
29814403Upper Back CushionNovember 2021September 2025Allow4701YesNo
29801276ORTHOPEDIC SCREWJuly 2021April 2023Allow2020NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner PAUL, SANJEEV - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner PAUL, SANJEEV works in Art Unit 2932 and has examined 2 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 47 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner PAUL, SANJEEV's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 98% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by PAUL, SANJEEV receive 1.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 9% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by PAUL, SANJEEV is 47 months. This places the examiner in the 9% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by PAUL, SANJEEV. This interview benefit is in the 15% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 31% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 100.0% of allowed cases (in the 99% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.