USPTO Examiner SHEPARD HILLARY CATHERINE - Art Unit 2931

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
30003371GUITAR STORAGE CABINETMay 2025October 2025Allow500NoNo
30001861CHAIRApril 2025December 2025Allow700NoNo
30001640Swivel ChairApril 2025December 2025Allow700NoNo
30001635SofaApril 2025December 2025Allow700NoNo
29981921Dressing TableJanuary 2025January 2026Allow1310NoNo
29968724DresserOctober 2024November 2025Allow1310NoNo
29961529BookshelfSeptember 2024January 2026Allow1600NoNo
29960027TV STANDAugust 2024October 2025Allow1300NoNo
29946182CABINETJune 2024November 2025Allow1700NoNo
29943015NIGHTSTANDMay 2024September 2025Allow1610NoNo
29943017TV STANDMay 2024September 2025Allow1610NoNo
29943002TV STANDMay 2024September 2025Allow1610NoNo
29943000NIGHTSTANDMay 2024September 2025Allow1610YesNo
35521450Gaming armchairJanuary 2024January 2026Allow1920NoNo
29886942CHAIRMarch 2023October 2025Allow3100NoNo
29884307CHAIRFebruary 2023November 2025Allow3301NoNo
29812259SEATOctober 2021October 2025Allow4810NoNo
29811212SEATOctober 2021September 2025Allow4710NoNo
29777437VANITYApril 2021October 2025Allow5511NoNo
29777457VANITYApril 2021October 2025Allow5511NoNo
29777444VANITYApril 2021September 2025Allow5420NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner SHEPARD, HILLARY CATHERINE - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner SHEPARD, HILLARY CATHERINE works in Art Unit 2931 and has examined 5 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 54 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner SHEPARD, HILLARY CATHERINE's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 97% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by SHEPARD, HILLARY CATHERINE receive 1.20 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 15% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SHEPARD, HILLARY CATHERINE is 54 months. This places the examiner in the 2% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 100.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 99% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 31% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 34% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.