USPTO Examiner EDGAR RICHARD A - Art Unit 2931

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
16987935WIND TURBINE AND METHOD FOR ICE REMOVAL IN WIND TURBINESAugust 2020February 2023Allow3120NoNo
15160850THRUST BEARING SURFACE FOR FLOATER-STYLE CENTRIFUGAL PUMPSMay 2016July 2016Allow200NoNo
14129953HYDRAULIC BEARING FOR A STATIONARY GAS TURBINEDecember 2013August 2016Allow3110NoNo
14070610STANDARDIZED GAS TURBINE INSPECTION PORT SYSTEMNovember 2013August 2016Allow3300NoNo
14059988COOLING-AIR GUIDANCE IN A HOUSING STRUCTURE OF A TURBOMACHINEOctober 2013July 2016Allow3310NoNo
13996054IMPINGEMENT COOLING OF GAS TURBINE BLADES OR VANESJune 2013July 2016Allow3720NoNo
13763506METHOD FOR RECONDITIONING A BLADE OF A GAS TURBINE AND ALSO A RECONDITIONED BLADEFebruary 2013July 2016Allow4130YesNo
13813272GAS TURBINE ENGINE COMPRISING A TENSION STUDJanuary 2013November 2015Allow3320NoNo
13753772BOOMERANG WIND BLADES AND THE DEVICE THEREOFJanuary 2013June 2015Allow2910NoNo
13810310EXHAUST GAS DIFFUSER FOR A GAS TURBINE AND A METHOD FOR OPERATING A GAS TURBINE THAT COMPRISES SUCH AN EXHAUST GAS DIFFUSERJanuary 2013November 2015Allow3410NoNo
13736335FANJanuary 2013September 2015Allow3210NoNo
13692791Method and System for Determining Gas Turbine Tip ClearanceDecember 2012April 2014Allow1610YesNo
13691498FLUID APPARATUS WITH PITCH ADJUSTABLE VANESNovember 2012January 2016Allow3810NoNo
13700928IMPELLER AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAMENovember 2012April 2015Allow2800NoNo
13673544BLADE CONNECTION FOR A ROTOR BLADE OF A WIND TURBINENovember 2012January 2016Allow3830YesNo
13586417ADJUSTABLE VANE DIFFUSER INSERT FOR ELECTRICAL SUBMERSIBLE PUMPAugust 2012August 2015Allow3610NoNo
13562411PARALLEL CASCADED CYCLE GAS EXPANDERJuly 2012June 2015Allow3410NoNo
13521839ENERGY SAVING PUMP WITH MULTIPLE IMPELLERSJuly 2012May 2015Allow3500NoNo
13455037Energy Conversion DeviceApril 2012March 2015Allow3410NoNo
13403364MISSION ADAPTIVE ROTOR BLADEFebruary 2012July 2016Allow5340YesNo
13341980FLOW DRIVEN ENGINEDecember 2011February 2013Allow1410YesNo
13339967COMPLIANT PLATE SEAL FOR USE WITH ROTATING MACHINES AND METHODS OF ASSEMBLING A ROTATING MACHINEDecember 2011February 2015Allow3710NoNo
13317543Impulse wind machineOctober 2011August 2014Allow3411YesNo
13218574VERTICAL AXIS WIND TURBINE GENERATORAugust 2011February 2014Allow3010NoNo
13140542BEARING VIBRATION MEASURING DEVICE FOR A TURBOMACHINEJune 2011July 2014Allow3610NoNo
13154371EFFICIENT WIND TURBINE BLADES, WIND TURBINE BLADE STRUCTURES, AND ASSOCIATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURE, ASSEMBLY AND USEJune 2011July 2012Allow1300NoNo
13104186Passage wall section for an annular flow passage of an axial turbomachine with radial gap adjustmentMay 2011January 2014Allow3210NoNo
13099759SAFETY RETAINING SYSTEM FOR LARGE INDUSTRIAL FANMay 2011June 2013Allow2520YesNo
13086460WIND TURBINEApril 2011April 2014Allow3610NoNo
13084822METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING GAS TURBINE TIP CLEARANCEApril 2011July 2012Allow1610NoNo
13078229Canopy for a Wind Turbine NacelleApril 2011April 2014Allow3610NoNo
13078366FLUID TURBINEApril 2011March 2014Allow3610NoNo
13120938ARRANGEMENT COMPRISING A SHAFT SEALMarch 2011October 2013Allow3000NoNo
13025677FLUID TURBINEFebruary 2011December 2013Allow3410NoNo
13024450VERY LOW HEAD PACKAGED SMALL HYDRO STATIONFebruary 2011August 2013Allow3000NoNo
13010866LEAF SEALJanuary 2011March 2012Allow1400NoNo
12947338LOW PRESSURE EXHAUST GAS DIFFUSER FOR A STEAM TURBINENovember 2010May 2013Allow3000NoNo
12865016NACELLE FOR TURBOJET ENGINEOctober 2010February 2015Allow5540YesNo
12899324SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DISTRIBUTING AIR WITHIN A WIND TURBINEOctober 2010August 2011Allow1010NoNo
12886557VERTICAL-AXIS WIND TURBINESeptember 2010June 2013Allow3300NoNo
12876602BLADE FOR A GAS TURBINESeptember 2010January 2012Allow1710NoNo
12919272Divided Turbomachine Housing Having Optimized Parting Line FlangesAugust 2010April 2013Allow3200NoNo
10568338Method For Braking A Rotor Of A Turbine Engine And A Turning Gear For Driving The Rotor Of A Turbine EngineAugust 2010September 2013Allow6010NoNo
12834071TURBINE BLADE WITH TIP COOLING CIRCUITJuly 2010September 2012Allow2700NoNo
12793931NACELLE CONFIGURATIONS FOR A SHROUDED WIND TURBINEJune 2010October 2013Allow4010NoNo
12793935MODULAR TURBINE AIRFOIL AND PLATFORM ASSEMBLY WITH INDEPENDENT ROOT TEETHJune 2010April 2013Allow3410NoNo
12740848WIND TURBINE BLADE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A WIND TURBINE BLADEApril 2010December 2011Allow1910NoNo
12729380CONTROL OF BLADE TIP-TO-SHROUD LEAKAGE IN A TURBINE ENGINE BY DIRECTED PLASMA FLOWMarch 2010August 2013Allow4010NoNo
12716516TURBINE AIRFOIL HAVING OUTBOARD AND INBOARD SECTIONSMarch 2010November 2014Allow5740YesNo
12691748SECTIONAL VANE FOR VERTICAL AXIS WIND POWER GENERATORJanuary 2010January 2013Allow3600NoNo
12668891FLUID INTAKE ASSEMBLYJanuary 2010July 2011Allow1810NoNo
12646825ELEVATION ANGLE ADJUSTMENT STRUCTURE FOR A SHAFT OF A WIND POWER GENERATORDecember 2009October 2012Allow3400NoNo
12638034TURBINE ENGINE AIRFOIL AND PLATFORM ASSEMBLYDecember 2009March 2012Allow2700NoNo
12617310MULTI-VANE SEGMENT DESIGN AND CASTING METHODNovember 2009October 2012Allow3500YesNo
12613157ACTIVE FLOW CONTROL SYSTEM FOR WIND TURBINENovember 2009July 2010Allow900NoNo
12608613GAS TURBINE EXHAUST STRUT REFURBISHMENTOctober 2009January 2013Allow3810NoNo
12576972TURBOCHARGER HEAT SHIELDOctober 2009March 2013Allow4120YesNo
12565027WIND TURBINE WITH MIXERS AND EJECTORSSeptember 2009April 2011Allow1810YesNo
12565090TURBINE WITH MIXERS AND EJECTORSSeptember 2009April 2011Allow1810YesNo
12461396OSCILLATING ENERGY CAPTURE MECHANISMAugust 2009July 2012Allow3500NoNo
12508439Wind Energy SystemJuly 2009March 2013Allow4710YesNo
12494895METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR INCREASING LIFT ON WIND TURBINE BLADEJune 2009May 2011Allow2230NoNo
12459269CEILING FANJune 2009April 2012Allow3400NoNo
12493353TURBO-MACHINE HAVING BELLOWS UNIT FOR AUTOMATIC AXIAL THRUST CONTROLJune 2009June 2012Allow3500YesNo
12486179MULTIPLE PIECE TURBINE BLADEJune 2009April 2012Allow3400NoNo
12486180INTERLOCKED CMC AIRFOILJune 2009April 2012Allow3400NoNo
12437615WIND TURBINE WITH MIXERS AND EJECTORSMay 2009April 2011Allow2320YesNo
12437610TURBINE WITH MIXERS AND EJECTORSMay 2009April 2011Allow2320YesNo
12387078METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING GAS TURBINE TIP CLEARANCEApril 2009November 2010Allow1910NoNo
12406086COOLING FANMarch 2009October 2011Allow3110NoNo
12319445BLADE ARMJanuary 2009April 2011Allow2710NoNo
12333522TURBINE BLADE AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAMEDecember 2008October 2010Allow2210NoNo
12122819SYSTEM, METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR OPEN IMPELLER AND DIFFUSER ASSEMBLY FOR MULTI-STAGE SUBMERSIBLE PUMPMay 2008August 2011Allow3800NoNo
12106375COMBUSTION TURBINE INCLUDING A DIFFUSER SECTION WITH COOLING FLUID PASSAGEWAYS AND ASSOCIATED METHODSApril 2008May 2012Allow4810NoNo
12106733ENGINE COMPONENTS AND ROTOR GROUPSApril 2008April 2012Allow4710NoNo
12105576TURBOMACHINE BLADEApril 2008March 2015Allow6030NoYes
12156808DUAL COMPRESSION ROTORApril 2008March 2012Allow4720NoNo
12062807MAIN ROTOR BLADE WITH REMOVABLE TIP CAPApril 2008April 2010Allow2410NoNo
12055393MECHANICALLY AFFIXED TURBINE SHROUD PLUGMarch 2008August 2011Allow4010NoNo
12055507FASTENER ASSEMBLY WITH CYCLONE COOLINGMarch 2008January 2012Allow4500NoNo
12054050WIND TURBINE WITH MIXERS AND EJECTORSMarch 2008June 2011Allow3920YesNo
11989552SECURING ELEMENT FOR FASTENING ROTOR BLADESJanuary 2008October 2011Allow4520NoNo
12017487TURBINE BLADE WITH DUAL AFT FLOWING TRIPLE PASS SERPENTINESJanuary 2008January 2011Allow3600YesNo
12014298AIRFOIL SEAL SYSTEM FOR GAS TURBINE ENGINEJanuary 2008February 2013Allow6010NoNo
11988709HOT-GAS-DUCTING HOUSING ELEMENT, PROTECTIVE SHAFT JACKET AND GAS TURBINE SYSTEMJanuary 2008December 2011Allow4700NoNo
11967176TURBINE NOZZLE SEGMENTDecember 2007December 2011Allow4810YesNo
11967177TURBINE NOZZLE SEGMENTDecember 2007January 2012Allow4910NoNo
11964994ROTOR DRUM FOR MULTIPLE ROTOR WIND TURBINEDecember 2007April 2011Allow4000NoNo
11965225CONNECTING SYSTEMDecember 2007December 2011Allow4700NoNo
11960099TURBINE COMPONENTS AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING TURBINE COMPONENTSDecember 2007November 2011Allow4610NoNo
11984850OSCILLATING ENERGY CAPTURE MECHANISMNovember 2007December 2011Allow4910NoNo
11942885TURBINE BLADE TIP COOLING SYSTEMNovember 2007March 2011Allow4010NoNo
11986026PROCESS FOR CONJUGATE CFD ANALYSIS OF A TURBINE AIRFOILNovember 2007October 2011Allow4710NoNo
11940902OSCILLATING WINDMILLNovember 2007January 2012Allow5010NoNo
11928500RING SEGMENT COOLANT SEAL CONFIGURATIONOctober 2007June 2011Allow4300NoNo
11928407STACKED LAMELLAE CERAMIC GAS TURBINE RING SEGMENT COMPONENTOctober 2007May 2011Allow4300NoNo
11929192SEQUENTIAL STIFFNESS SUPPORT FOR BEARING ASSEMBLIES AND METHOD OF FABRICATIONOctober 2007May 2012Allow5430YesNo
11902810WIND COLLECTORSeptember 2007July 2009Allow2230NoNo
11902811WIND TURBINESeptember 2007September 2009Allow2430YesNo
11858998GAS TURBINE COMPONENT WITH REDUCED COOLING AIR REQUIREMENTSeptember 2007October 2010Allow3710NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner EDGAR, RICHARD A.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
1
Examiner Affirmed
0
(0.0%)
Examiner Reversed
1
(100.0%)
Reversal Percentile
97.2%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 100.0% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
3
Allowed After Appeal Filing
2
(66.7%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
1
(33.3%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
91.8%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 66.7% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner EDGAR, RICHARD A - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner EDGAR, RICHARD A works in Art Unit 2931 and has examined 342 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 99.7%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 25 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner EDGAR, RICHARD A's allowance rate of 99.7% places them in the 93% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by EDGAR, RICHARD A receive 1.09 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 9% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by EDGAR, RICHARD A is 25 months. This places the examiner in the 79% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.4% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by EDGAR, RICHARD A. This interview benefit is in the 19% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 38.3% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 88% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 68.7% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 92% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 16% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 75.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 65% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 33.3% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 19.5% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 10% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 15.2% of allowed cases (in the 97% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 4.1% of allowed cases (in the 80% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.
  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.