USPTO Examiner CALABRESE MARY ANN - Art Unit 2931

Examiner Information

Name: CALABRESE, MARY ANN
Art Unit: 2931
Total Cases: 3
Last Active: March 2025

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
35524525Side tableMarch 2025February 2026Allow1100NoNo
29985473Office FurnitureJanuary 2025August 2025Allow700NoNo
29985469Office FurnitureJanuary 2025August 2025Allow700NoNo
29985481Office FurnitureJanuary 2025August 2025Allow700NoNo
29985477Office FurnitureJanuary 2025August 2025Allow700NoNo
29984376Office FurnitureJanuary 2025August 2025Allow700NoNo
29984374Office FurnitureJanuary 2025November 2025Allow1100NoNo
29979832TableDecember 2024January 2026Allow1300NoNo
29979966TableDecember 2024January 2026Allow1300NoNo
29975086TABLE BASENovember 2024September 2025Allow1000NoNo
29947381TABLETOPJune 2024December 2025Allow1810NoNo
29947380TABLETOPJune 2024December 2025Allow1810NoNo
29945495DESKJune 2024October 2025Allow1700NoNo
29945222Inflatable Seat CushionMay 2024September 2025Allow1600NoNo
29944614TABLEMay 2024November 2025Allow1800NoNo
35521250TableMay 2024July 2025Allow1410NoNo
29940215Computer DeskApril 2024December 2025Allow2000NoNo
29940197Computer DeskApril 2024December 2025Allow2000NoNo
35524533Folding tableMarch 2024March 2026Allow2300NoNo
29933582CHAIRMarch 2024December 2025Allow2100NoNo
35523679Single Leg Side tableJanuary 2024December 2025Allow2300NoNo
29924142PEDESTAL SIDE TABLEJanuary 2024November 2025Allow2200NoNo
29924145C SIDE TABLEJanuary 2024November 2025Allow2200NoNo
35522823DESKOctober 2023January 2026Allow2701NoNo
29905836TABLEOctober 2023November 2025Allow2400NoNo
29914272CONSOLEOctober 2023October 2025Allow2400NoNo
29904088TableSeptember 2023October 2025Allow2500NoNo
29878641TableJune 2023December 2025Allow3000NoNo
29874361FURNITURE SUPPORTApril 2023November 2025Allow3101NoNo
35505632Child safety seat for motor carsMarch 2018January 2020Abandon2210NoNo
35500998LogoFebruary 2016September 2017Abandon1910NoNo
35500985Graphical user interface for a display screen or portionthereofFebruary 2016September 2017Abandon1910NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner CALABRESE, MARY ANN - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner CALABRESE, MARY ANN works in Art Unit 2931 and has examined 3 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 0.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 19 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner CALABRESE, MARY ANN's allowance rate of 0.0% places them in the 0% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by CALABRESE, MARY ANN receive 1.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 9% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by CALABRESE, MARY ANN is 19 months. This places the examiner in the 95% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 31% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.