Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35521438 | Screw | June 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 29938676 | Night vision goggle | April 2024 | May 2025 | Allow | 13 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 29935487 | LED ILLUMINATING LENS | April 2024 | June 2025 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 29934507 | TELESCOPIC SIGHT MOUNT | March 2024 | June 2025 | Allow | 14 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 29930574 | Digital Microscope | March 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 29930329 | Night vision goggle | February 2024 | May 2025 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 29930332 | Night vision goggle | February 2024 | May 2025 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 29930327 | Night vision goggle | February 2024 | May 2025 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 29930330 | Night vision goggle | February 2024 | May 2025 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 29930333 | Night vision goggle | February 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 29930336 | Night vision goggle | February 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 35511929 | HANDBAG | February 2021 | March 2023 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 35511845 | BAG | January 2021 | March 2023 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 35511886 | MICROSCOPE | November 2020 | January 2023 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 35511477 | SPECTACLES | August 2020 | January 2023 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 29743676 | CONTAINER | July 2020 | January 2023 | Allow | 30 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 29706304 | BATTERY FOR DIGITAL CAMERA | September 2019 | December 2022 | Allow | 39 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 29705792 | DIGITAL CAMERA | September 2019 | March 2023 | Allow | 42 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner THURMAN, HOLLY E works in Art Unit 2919 and has examined 7 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 28 months.
Examiner THURMAN, HOLLY E's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 97% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by THURMAN, HOLLY E receive 1.14 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 13% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by THURMAN, HOLLY E is 28 months. This places the examiner in the 70% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by THURMAN, HOLLY E. This interview benefit is in the 15% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 75.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 94% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 29% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 57.1% of allowed cases (in the 98% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.