USPTO Examiner BRODOWSKI SAMANTHA LYNNE - Art Unit 2913

Examiner Information

Name: BRODOWSKI, SAMANTHA LYNNE
Art Unit: 2913
Total Cases: 3
Last Active: July 2025

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
30011892LID WITH CENTRAL DIAMONDJuly 2025November 2025Allow400NoNo
35524485BagFebruary 2025March 2026Allow1200YesNo
29980607BagDecember 2024December 2025Allow1100NoNo
29980780Luggage CoverDecember 2024September 2025Allow810YesNo
29979873LID FOR WEATHERPROOF SPORTSMAN'S TRUNKDecember 2024October 2025Allow1000NoNo
29978810Inflatable bagDecember 2024January 2026Allow1300NoNo
29977137HANDBAGDecember 2024December 2025Allow1200NoNo
29977145HANDBAGDecember 2024December 2025Allow1200NoNo
35523377HandbagDecember 2024October 2025Allow1100NoNo
29973954BAGNovember 2024January 2026Allow1400NoNo
29971853BAGNovember 2024December 2025Allow1300NoNo
29970998Illuminated PurseOctober 2024November 2025Allow1200NoNo
29965532HANDBAGSeptember 2024January 2026Allow1610NoNo
35522827BagAugust 2024December 2025Allow1410NoNo
35522838BagAugust 2024December 2025Allow1610NoNo
29958557HANDBAGAugust 2024November 2025Allow1500NoNo
29958485HANDBAGAugust 2024December 2025Allow1600NoNo
29958575HANDBAGAugust 2024October 2025Allow1410NoNo
35523686BagJuly 2024November 2025Allow1500NoNo
29953198HANDBAGJuly 2024October 2025Allow1500NoNo
29950549HANDBAGJuly 2024December 2025Allow1710NoNo
29941108HandbagMay 2024January 2026Allow2010NoNo
29938938Bag HolderApril 2024November 2025Allow1900NoNo
35522067BagFebruary 2024July 2025Allow1010NoNo
35522069BagFebruary 2024July 2025Allow1110YesNo
29918812HANDBAGNovember 2023April 2025Allow1710NoNo
29904998Shopping bagOctober 2023November 2025Allow2510NoNo
29902168Rugged CaseSeptember 2023November 2025Allow2610NoNo
29859084GOLF BAGNovember 2022October 2025Allow3600NoNo
29846145Protective caseJuly 2022October 2025Allow4020NoNo
29813531WalletOctober 2021December 2025Allow5010NoNo
29813530WalletOctober 2021December 2025Allow5010NoNo
29799237BAGJuly 2021October 2025Allow5120NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner BRODOWSKI, SAMANTHA LYNNE - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner BRODOWSKI, SAMANTHA LYNNE works in Art Unit 2913 and has examined 3 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 50 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner BRODOWSKI, SAMANTHA LYNNE's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 97% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by BRODOWSKI, SAMANTHA LYNNE receive 1.33 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 19% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by BRODOWSKI, SAMANTHA LYNNE is 50 months. This places the examiner in the 5% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 100.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 99% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 29% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 34% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.