USPTO Examiner PARKER JOHN M - Art Unit 2899

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
19186013ELECTRICAL BRIDGE PACKAGE WITH INTEGRATED OFF-BRIDGE PHOTONIC CHANNEL INTERFACEApril 2025September 2025Allow510NoNo
18873329METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE, SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE, AND SEMICONDUCTOR MEMBERDecember 2024March 2025Allow300NoNo
18407408ELECTRICAL BRIDGE PACKAGE WITH INTEGRATED OFF-BRIDGE PHOTONIC CHANNEL INTERFACEJanuary 2024July 2024Allow710NoNo
18507597MICRO ASSEMBLED LED DISPLAYS AND LIGHTING ELEMENTSNovember 2023July 2024Allow800NoNo
18485884DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICEOctober 2023January 2025Allow1610NoNo
18359795TEXTURED OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICES AND ASSOCIATED METHODS OF MANUFACTUREJuly 2023December 2024Allow1720NoNo
18356780FORMING AN OXIDE VOLUME WITHIN A FINJuly 2023October 2024Allow1521NoNo
18353997VIA LANDING ON FIRST AND SECOND BARRIER LAYERS TO REDUCE CLEANING TIME OF CONDUCTIVE STRUCTUREJuly 2023July 2025Allow2410NoNo
18352299RUTHENIUM OXIDE FILM AND RUTHENIUM LINER FOR LOW-RESISTANCE COPPER INTERCONNECTS IN A DEVICEJuly 2023January 2026Allow3120YesNo
18221531METHOD FOR PREPARING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH COMPOSITE PASSIVATION STRUCTUREJuly 2023April 2025Allow2110NoNo
18351946SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICEJuly 2023July 2025Allow2410NoNo
18333715CONTACT STRUCTURES FOR REDUCING ELECTRICAL SHORTS AND METHODS OF FORMING THE SAMEJune 2023May 2025Allow2310YesNo
18328789SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICEJune 2023August 2025Allow2610NoNo
18328916REDISTRIBUTION LAYER FEATURESJune 2023February 2025Allow2100NoNo
18202924SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE STRUCTURE AND METHODS OF FORMING THE SAMEMay 2023July 2025Allow2611NoNo
18201200CONTACT PAD STRUCTURE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOFMay 2023January 2026Allow3201NoNo
18198644METHOD OF FORMING SHAPED SOURCE/DRAIN EPITAXIAL LAYERS OF A SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICEMay 2023July 2025Allow2610NoNo
18196077SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE INCLUDING THE SAMEMay 2023March 2025Allow2310YesNo
18036281METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MAKING INTEGRATED COOLING LIQUID CAVITY IN PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDMay 2023November 2025Allow3010YesNo
18140198INTEGRATED INDUCTOR WITH A STACKED METAL WIREApril 2023September 2025Allow2910NoNo
18136888SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND FABRICATION METHOD THEREOFApril 2023January 2026Allow3311NoNo
18134529INTERCONNECTION STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAMEApril 2023November 2025Allow3111NoNo
18191290INTERCONNECT STRUCTURE FOR MULTI-THICKNESS SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICEMarch 2023September 2025Allow3001NoNo
18190175METAL WIRES WITH EXPANDED SIDEWALLSMarch 2023January 2026Allow3420NoNo
18188555Power Semiconductor Module with Two Opposite Half-BridgesMarch 2023December 2025Abandon3300NoNo
18124339SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICEMarch 2023January 2025Allow2200NoNo
18123101ULTRA-THIN LAYERS BY SELECTIVE PASSIVATIONMarch 2023January 2026Allow3410NoNo
18185248SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOFMarch 2023January 2026Allow3421YesNo
18120826SEMICONDUCTOR CHIP, SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE INCLUDING THE SAME, AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAMEMarch 2023November 2025Allow3200NoNo
18119947SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH FILLING LAYERMarch 2023December 2025Allow3420NoNo
18181293REDISTRIBUTION LAYER METALLIC STRUCTURE AND METHODMarch 2023November 2025Allow3301NoNo
18118935CO-INTEGRATED VERTICALLY STRUCTURED CAPACITIVE ELEMENT AND FABRICATION PROCESSMarch 2023March 2025Allow2401NoNo
18179377SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAMEMarch 2023November 2025Allow3211NoNo
18178448ISOLATORMarch 2023October 2025Allow3110NoNo
18176551SELF-ALIGNED BACKSIDE INTERCONNECT STRUCTURESMarch 2023February 2026Allow3611YesNo
18176904SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING THE SAMEMarch 2023December 2025Allow3420NoNo
18176652SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR FORMING SAMEMarch 2023June 2025Allow2700NoNo
18116276Semiconductor circuit pattern and manufacturing method thereofMarch 2023January 2026Allow3521NoNo
18174767Integrated Structure of MOS Transistors Having Different Working Voltages and Method for Manufacturing SameFebruary 2023July 2025Allow2901NoNo
18172420VIA STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR FORMING THE SAMEFebruary 2023February 2026Allow3611NoNo
18170933ETCHING-DAMAGE-FREE INTERMETAL DIELECTRIC LAYER WITH THERMAL DISSIPATION FEATUREFebruary 2023February 2026Allow3611NoNo
18169984SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURES INCLUDING METAL WIRES WITH EDGE CURVATUREFebruary 2023January 2026Allow3511YesNo
18169600CONTACT ARRANGEMENTS FOR DEEP TRENCH CAPACITORSFebruary 2023January 2026Allow3511NoNo
18109569CONTACT FOR ELECTRONIC COMPONENTFebruary 2023March 2026Allow3711NoNo
18167087SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES AND METHODS OF FORMING THE SAMEFebruary 2023October 2025Allow3211NoNo
18107521MIM CAPACITOR STRUCTURE AND FABRICATING METHOD OF THE SAMEFebruary 2023August 2025Allow3011NoNo
18107688STRUCTURES WITH DOPED SEMICONDUCTOR LAYERS AND METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR FORMING SAMEFebruary 2023October 2024Allow2110NoNo
18159279LIGHT EMITTING ELEMENTJanuary 2023May 2025Allow2700NoNo
18156752MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICEJanuary 2023October 2025Allow3310NoNo
18153447SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICEJanuary 2023August 2025Allow3110NoNo
18153832Wet Cleaning with Tunable Metal Recess for Via PlugsJanuary 2023April 2025Allow2711NoNo
18146478ADVANCED PITCH INTERCONNECTS WITH MULTIPLE LOW ASPECT RATIO SEGMENTSDecember 2022December 2025Allow3611YesNo
18145157OCTAGONAL INTERCONNECT WIRING FOR ADVANCED LOGICDecember 2022February 2026Allow3811NoNo
18077382SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH A LINER LAYERDecember 2022October 2025Allow3520NoNo
18073870DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAMEDecember 2022November 2024Allow2300NoNo
17973920Hybrid Embedded PackageOctober 2022May 2025Allow3110NoNo
17963649HYBRID WAFER BONDING METHODOctober 2022July 2025Allow3410NoNo
17958764HYBRID WAFER BONDING METHOD AND STRUCTURE THEREOFOctober 2022July 2025Allow3311YesNo
17953463DISPLAY DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOFSeptember 2022November 2024Allow2610NoNo
17947288INTEGRATED CIRCUITSeptember 2022January 2025Allow2830YesNo
17942843SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND CORRESPONDING METHODSeptember 2022July 2024Allow2200NoNo
17902319INTERCONNECT STRUCTURE AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS INCLUDING THE SAMESeptember 2022August 2024Allow2400NoNo
17929234ON-PITCH VIAS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES AND ASSOCIATED DEVICES AND SYSTEMSSeptember 2022March 2025Allow3111NoNo
17898299PACKAGE STRUCTURE AND CIRCUIT LAYER STRUCTURE INCLUDING DUMMY TRACE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFORAugust 2022October 2024Allow2510NoNo
17893349SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE AND APPARATUS INCLUDING THE SAMEAugust 2022April 2024Allow2000NoNo
17880854THROUGH-SUBSTRATE VIA FORMATION TO ENLARGE ELECTROCHEMICAL PLATING WINDOWAugust 2022August 2024Allow2410NoNo
17879677SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAMEAugust 2022August 2024Allow2410NoNo
178770413D High Bandwidth Memory and Optical Connectivity StackingJuly 2022January 2026Allow4201NoNo
17875675HYBRID CONDUCTIVE STRUCTURESJuly 2022March 2024Allow2000NoNo
17874323PACKAGE STRUCTURESJuly 2022July 2024Allow2410NoNo
17874639SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE STRUCTURE AND METHODS OF FORMING THE SAMEJuly 2022March 2024Allow2000NoNo
17873381INTER-WIRE CAVITY FOR LOW CAPACITANCEJuly 2022October 2025Allow3901NoNo
17815080Spacers for Semiconductor Devices Including Backside Power RailsJuly 2022May 2025Allow3310NoNo
17873214INTERCONNECT STRUCTUREJuly 2022January 2026Allow4220NoNo
17814844METHOD FOR FORMING SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTUREJuly 2022January 2025Allow2910NoNo
17873590HYBRID METHOD FOR FORMING SEMICONDUCTOR INTERCONNECT STRUCTUREJuly 2022September 2024Allow2610NoNo
17814775TSV Structure and Method Forming SameJuly 2022April 2024Allow2110NoNo
17872144THERMALLY STABLE COPPER-ALLOY ADHESION LAYER FOR METAL INTERCONNECT STRUCTURES AND METHODS FOR FORMING THE SAMEJuly 2022April 2024Allow2110NoNo
17814259SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND LIGHT-EMITTING SYSTEMJuly 2022July 2024Allow2420NoNo
17759295Thin Sheet-Like Connecting Member and Manufacturing Method therefor, Semiconductor Device and Manufacturing Method therefor, and Power Conversion DeviceJuly 2022March 2025Allow3100NoNo
17869898TWO 2D CAPPING LAYERS ON INTERCONNECT CONDUCTIVE STRUCTURE TO INCREASE INTERCONNECT STRUCTURE RELIABILITYJuly 2022March 2024Allow2010NoNo
17869860FRONT-END-OF-LINE (FEOL) THROUGH SEMICONDUCTOR-ON-SUBSTRATE VIA (TSV)July 2022March 2024Allow2010NoNo
17813880STRUCTURE AND METHOD OF FORMING A SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH RESISTIVE ELEMENTSJuly 2022April 2024Allow2110NoNo
17869702TITANIUM-CONTAINING DIFFUSION BARRIER FOR CMP REMOVAL RATE ENHANCEMENT AND CONTAMINATION REDUCTIONJuly 2022February 2025Allow3130YesNo
17858116METHOD OF FABRICATING A SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE WITH IMPROVED DICING PROPERTIESJuly 2022June 2025Allow3510NoNo
17855723SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAMEJune 2022March 2025Allow3331YesNo
17852961Chip-On-Wafer Structure with Chiplet InterposerJune 2022February 2024Allow2010NoNo
17846650MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICEJune 2022October 2024Allow2720NoNo
17842302Power Module With Metal SubstrateJune 2022February 2024Allow2010NoNo
17837518CONFORMAL TITANIUM NITRIDE-BASED THIN FILMS AND METHODS OF FORMING SAMEJune 2022July 2024Allow2510NoNo
17829590CAPPING LAYER OVERLYING DIELECTRIC STRUCTURE TO INCREASE RELIABILITYJune 2022January 2024Allow2010NoNo
17751895USING A LINER LAYER TO ENLARGE PROCESS WINDOW FOR A CONTACT VIAMay 2022March 2024Allow2110NoNo
17736945SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGES AND FORMING METHODS THEREOFMay 2022April 2024Allow2310YesNo
17771350METHOD OF PRODUCING A SEMICONDUCTOR BODY WITH A TRENCH, SEMICONDUCTOR BODY WITH AT LEAST ONE TRENCH AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICEApril 2022March 2025Allow3511NoNo
17723751SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH LINER STRUCTUREApril 2022April 2025Allow3610NoNo
17716485INTERCONNECT STRUCTURE INCLUDING TOPOLOGICAL MATERIALApril 2022May 2025Allow3711NoNo
17714935CONFORMAL TITANIUM SILICON NITRIDE-BASED THIN FILMS AND METHODS OF FORMING SAMEApril 2022June 2025Allow3800NoNo
17714973CONFORMAL TITANIUM SILICON NITRIDE-BASED THIN FILMS AND METHODS OF FORMING SAMEApril 2022June 2025Allow3800NoNo
17708998HIGH VOLTAGE PASSIVE DEVICE STRUCTUREMarch 2022February 2025Allow3400NoNo
17705239SINGLE SIDE VIA FILL PROCESS FOR THROUGH-VIASMarch 2022May 2025Allow3810NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner PARKER, JOHN M.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
2
Examiner Affirmed
1
(50.0%)
Examiner Reversed
1
(50.0%)
Reversal Percentile
76.0%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 50.0% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
4
Allowed After Appeal Filing
2
(50.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
2
(50.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
81.5%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 50.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner PARKER, JOHN M - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner PARKER, JOHN M works in Art Unit 2899 and has examined 122 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 99.2%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 30 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner PARKER, JOHN M's allowance rate of 99.2% places them in the 93% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by PARKER, JOHN M receive 1.45 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 24% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by PARKER, JOHN M is 30 months. This places the examiner in the 61% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +1.1% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by PARKER, JOHN M. This interview benefit is in the 19% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 34.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 77% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 42.9% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 66% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 100.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 75% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 66.7% of appeals filed. This is in the 50% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 25.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 22.2% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 11% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 4.1% of allowed cases (in the 83% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 6.6% of allowed cases (in the 84% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.