Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18898541 | COOLING CHANNEL SHAPE WITH SUBSTANTIALLY CONSTANT CROSS SECTIONAL AREA | September 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 12 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18784639 | FLUID CHANNEL GEOMETRY OPTIMIZATIONS TO IMPROVE COOLING EFFICIENCY | July 2024 | April 2025 | Allow | 8 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18317117 | SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE COMPRISING POWER DELIVER NETWORK STRUCTURE | May 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18313526 | INTERPOSER FOR IMPLEMENTING FLIP-CHIP DIES IN WIREBONDED CIRCUIT ASSEMBLIES | May 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18150569 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE PACKAGES AND METHODS OF FORMATION | January 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18010570 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE | December 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17972215 | SEMICONDUCTOR MODULE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR MODULE | October 2022 | December 2025 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17954122 | PACKAGED ELECTRONIC DEVICE WITH SUSPENDED MAGNETIC SUBASSEMBLY | September 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17946501 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE | September 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17943224 | INTERCONNECT STRUCTURE | September 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 40 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17823654 | METHOD FOR PRODUCING A SUPERCONDUCTING VANADIUM SILICIDE ON A SILICON LAYER | August 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17865565 | Memory Circuitry And Method Used In Forming Memory Circuitry | July 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 36 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 17806499 | METHOD OF MANUFACTURING MICRO DEVICES | June 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17750586 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAME | May 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 31 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 17703254 | METHODS FOR OXIDIZING A SILICON HARDMASK USING ION IMPLANT | March 2022 | December 2025 | Allow | 44 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17694862 | MEMORY DEVICE HAVING DOUBLE SIDED CAPACITOR | March 2022 | October 2025 | Abandon | 43 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17682829 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE | February 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17680507 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAME | February 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17680368 | STACKED RANDOM-ACCESS MEMORY DEVICES WITH REFRIGERATION | February 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 47 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17650127 | GRAPHIC ELEMENT STRUCTURE AND GRAPHIC ARRAY STRUCTURE | February 2022 | May 2025 | Abandon | 39 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17350175 | GLASS PACKAGE CORE WITH PLANAR STRUCTURES | June 2021 | November 2025 | Abandon | 53 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner MELLINGER, CORBYN DAVID works in Art Unit 2899 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 0.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 53 months.
Examiner MELLINGER, CORBYN DAVID's allowance rate of 0.0% places them in the 0% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by MELLINGER, CORBYN DAVID receive 2.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 51% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by MELLINGER, CORBYN DAVID is 53 months. This places the examiner in the 3% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 2% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 28% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.