Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17053858 | SOLID-STATE IMAGING DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SOLID-STATE IMAGING DEVICE | November 2020 | May 2025 | Abandon | 54 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16976736 | DISPLAY DEVICE | August 2020 | September 2024 | Abandon | 48 | 4 | 1 | No | No |
| 16937038 | DISPLAY DEVICE | July 2020 | June 2024 | Allow | 47 | 4 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16638825 | DISPLAY DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | February 2020 | May 2022 | Allow | 27 | 6 | 1 | No | No |
| 16713648 | HIGH VOLTAGE EXTENDED-DRAIN MOS (EDMOS) NANOWIRE TRANSISTORS | December 2019 | March 2024 | Allow | 51 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16713619 | CO-INTEGRATED HIGH PERFORMANCE NANORIBBON TRANSISTORS WITH HIGH VOLTAGE THICK GATE FINFET DEVICES | December 2019 | March 2025 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 15461567 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE SAME | March 2017 | April 2018 | Allow | 13 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 15173481 | MOTFT WITH UN-PATTERNED ETCH-STOP | June 2016 | June 2018 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 15081662 | METHOD FOR PRODUCING OPTICAL COMPONENT, OPTICAL COMPONENT, AND OPTICAL DEVICE | March 2016 | May 2018 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 14402020 | SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE COMPRISING AN ABSORBING AREA PLACED IN A FOCUSING CAVITY | November 2014 | July 2018 | Allow | 43 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14527256 | FINFET VERTICAL FLASH MEMORY | October 2014 | February 2018 | Allow | 39 | 4 | 1 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner HOANG, TUAN A works in Art Unit 2898 and has examined 11 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 81.8%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 43 months.
Examiner HOANG, TUAN A's allowance rate of 81.8% places them in the 55% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by HOANG, TUAN A receive 3.45 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 91% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by HOANG, TUAN A is 43 months. This places the examiner in the 17% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +3.3% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by HOANG, TUAN A. This interview benefit is in the 26% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 13.6% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 11% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 30.8% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 46% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 28% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 35% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.