Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18595049 | INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DEVICE WITH IMPROVED LAYOUT | March 2024 | January 2025 | Allow | 10 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18538202 | METHOD FOR MAKING MICRO-LED DISPLAY PANEL | December 2023 | July 2024 | Allow | 7 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18237390 | LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE FOR DISPLAY AND LED DISPLAY APPARATUS HAVING THE SAME | August 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18355220 | DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME | July 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18335162 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE | June 2023 | July 2024 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18329326 | DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAME | June 2023 | June 2024 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18135194 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE | April 2023 | July 2024 | Allow | 15 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18151990 | METHOD OF MAKING A SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE | January 2023 | January 2024 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18148341 | IMAGE PICKUP DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING IMAGE PICKUP DEVICE | December 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17939300 | LIGHT-EMITTING STRUCTURE AND LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME | September 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17929879 | MEMORY DEVICE USING A MULTILAYER FERROELECTRIC STACK AND METHOD OF FORMING THE SAME | September 2022 | February 2024 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17869909 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE, ELECTRONIC SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SAME, AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAME | July 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 34 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17833034 | Structure and Method of Forming a Joint Assembly | June 2022 | February 2024 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17744749 | BIOSENSOR | May 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 35 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17721865 | LIGHT EMITTING DISPLAY DEVICE | April 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17716178 | Silicon-Carbide (SiC) Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistor (MOSFET) with Short Circuit Protection | April 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17712518 | DISPLAY DEVICE | April 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17688486 | LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE PACKAGE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | March 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 32 | 3 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17679177 | EXTENDED-DRAIN METAL-OXIDE-SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES WITH A GAP BETWEEN THE DRAIN AND BODY WELLS | February 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17647955 | MULTI-SPECTRAL STEALTH DEVICE | January 2022 | June 2025 | Abandon | 41 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17620952 | LATERALLY DIFFUSED METAL OXIDE SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR | December 2021 | December 2024 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17620221 | TRANSISTOR AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF | December 2021 | March 2025 | Allow | 39 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17542793 | BIPOLAR TRANSISTORS | December 2021 | June 2025 | Abandon | 42 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17517761 | SHALLOW TRENCH ISOLATION STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME | November 2021 | March 2025 | Abandon | 40 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17512689 | DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE | October 2021 | February 2025 | Allow | 40 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17483060 | DISPLAY DEVICE AND TILED DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME | September 2021 | April 2024 | Allow | 31 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17461193 | BIPOLAR JUNCTION TRANSISTOR (BJT) AND FABRICATING METHOD THEREOF | August 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 17380158 | PID TEST STRUCTURE AND SEMICONDUCTOR TEST STRUCTURE | July 2021 | August 2024 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17378138 | Display Panel and Display Device | July 2021 | March 2024 | Allow | 32 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17414366 | OPTOELECTRONIC SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE | June 2021 | August 2024 | Abandon | 38 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17302986 | VERTICAL FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTOR WITH LOW-RESISTANCE BOTTOM SOURCE-DRAIN CONTACT | May 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 40 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17292498 | ION-SENSITIVE FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTOR | May 2021 | May 2024 | Abandon | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17313748 | SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND METHOD OF FORMING THE SAME | May 2021 | December 2023 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17157269 | AIRGAP STRUCTURES IN AUTO-DOPED REGION UNDER ONE OR MORE TRANSISTORS | January 2021 | April 2024 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17112635 | THREE-DIMENSIONAL MEMORY DEVICES WITH CHANNEL STRUCTURES HAVING PLUM BLOSSOM SHAPE AND METHODS FOR FORMING THE SAME | December 2020 | March 2024 | Allow | 40 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15938386 | SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE | March 2018 | April 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 8 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 14937029 | SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE HAVING A SOURCE AND A DRAIN WITH REVERSE FACETS | November 2015 | February 2017 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14739543 | SERIES RESISTANCE REDUCTION IN VERTICALLY STACKED SILICON NANOWIRE TRANSISTORS | June 2015 | July 2018 | Allow | 37 | 3 | 1 | No | No |
| 14735283 | DEVICES AND METHODS OF FORMING UNMERGED EPITAXY FOR FINFET DEVICE | June 2015 | September 2017 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 14576293 | METHOD FOR FORMING STRUCTURES IN A SOLAR CELL | December 2014 | June 2016 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14151550 | SEMICONDUCTOR-ON-OXIDE STRUCTURE AND METHOD OF FORMING | January 2014 | December 2015 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 14099423 | LIGHT EMITTING DIODE | December 2013 | September 2015 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13446350 | SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE HAVING A SOURCE AND A DRAIN WITH REVERSE FACETS | April 2012 | August 2015 | Allow | 40 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 13435070 | TRANSISTOR WITH ADJUSTABLE SUPPLY AND/OR THRESHOLD VOLTAGE | March 2012 | May 2014 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13435056 | SEMICONDUCTOR-ON-OXIDE STRUCTURE AND METHOD OF FORMING | March 2012 | June 2014 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 13336356 | METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING LIGHTING DEVICE | December 2011 | June 2013 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13265438 | METHOD FOR FORMING STRUCTURES IN A SOLAR CELL | November 2011 | September 2014 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13277872 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH MULTIPLE STRESS STRUCTURES AND METHOD OF FORMING THE SAME | October 2011 | February 2014 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 13265282 | ILLUMINATION SYSTEM COMPRISING BEAM SHAPING ELEMENT | October 2011 | April 2017 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 13236729 | NONVOLATILE MEMORY DEVICE | September 2011 | June 2013 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13128907 | PD SOI DEVICE WITH A BODY CONTACT STRUCTURE | May 2011 | September 2014 | Allow | 40 | 4 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 13034772 | IONIC JUNCTION FOR RADIATION DETECTORS | February 2011 | February 2014 | Allow | 36 | 4 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 12972310 | EMBEDDED BALL GRID ARRAY SUBSTRATE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF | December 2010 | July 2013 | Allow | 31 | 3 | 1 | No | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner RAMPERSAUD, PRIYA M.
With a 100.0% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 100.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
✓ Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner RAMPERSAUD, PRIYA M works in Art Unit 2897 and has examined 52 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 88.5%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 34 months.
Examiner RAMPERSAUD, PRIYA M's allowance rate of 88.5% places them in the 66% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by RAMPERSAUD, PRIYA M receive 1.60 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 42% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by RAMPERSAUD, PRIYA M is 34 months. This places the examiner in the 24% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +5.1% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by RAMPERSAUD, PRIYA M. This interview benefit is in the 30% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 28.1% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 41% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 43.8% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 60% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 66.7% of appeals filed. This is in the 45% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 26% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 30% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.