Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18432614 | SEMICONDUCTOR MODULE | February 2024 | April 2025 | Abandon | 15 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17639551 | DISPLAY-SCREEN PIXEL | March 2022 | February 2025 | Abandon | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17625042 | METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION OF A POLYMER COATED GRAPHENE LAYER STRUCTURE AND GRAPHENE LAYER STRUCTURE | January 2022 | December 2024 | Abandon | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17497099 | MONOLITHIC QUBIT INTEGRATED CIRCUITS | October 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 35 | 3 | 1 | No | No |
| 17471637 | APPARATUSES FOR DETECTING RADIATION AND THEIR METHODS OF MAKING | September 2021 | September 2024 | Abandon | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16945930 | MEMS MICROPHONE AND MOBILE TERMINAL | August 2020 | April 2024 | Abandon | 44 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner PURVIS, SUE A works in Art Unit 2893 and has examined 5 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 20.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 36 months.
Examiner PURVIS, SUE A's allowance rate of 20.0% places them in the 1% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by PURVIS, SUE A receive 1.40 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 30% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by PURVIS, SUE A is 36 months. This places the examiner in the 17% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 50.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 97% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 26% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 30% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.