USPTO Examiner GREAVING JASON JAMES - Art Unit 2893

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
19119588MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR A POWER SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND POWER SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICEApril 2025September 2025Allow610NoNo
18829143HOMOGENEOUS OPTOELECTRONIC RESERVOIR COMPUTING SYSTEM BASED ON NITROGEN-DOPED GE-SB-TE MATERIALSeptember 2024August 2025Abandon1110NoNo
18382688SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH SPACER AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE SAMEOctober 2023March 2026Allow2900NoNo
18103644SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE INCLUDING MULTIPLE SPACERS AND A METHOD FOR PREPARING THE SAMEJanuary 2023January 2026Allow3610NoNo
18016880SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICEJanuary 2023October 2025Allow3300NoNo
17966217DEVICE COMPRISING SPACERS INCLUDING A LOCALISED AIRGAP AND ASSOCIATED MANUFACTURING METHODSOctober 2022June 2025Allow3201YesNo
17950835DISPLAY DEVICESeptember 2022January 2026Allow4011NoNo
17943638SINGLE-PHOTON AVALANCHE DIODE WITH ISOLATED JUNCTIONSSeptember 2022October 2025Allow3710NoNo
17899885ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE DEVICE AND DISPLAY DRIVING CHIP INCLUDING THE SAMEAugust 2022September 2025Allow3711YesNo
17900804SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOFAugust 2022December 2025Allow4011YesNo
17879176STACK TYPE SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICEAugust 2022October 2025Allow3811YesNo
17796647DISPLAY SUBSTRATE AND DISPLAY DEVICEJuly 2022September 2025Allow3810NoNo
17759204DISPLAY DEVICEJuly 2022September 2025Allow3810NoNo
17791956DISPLAY SUBSTRATE AND DISPLAY DEVICEJuly 2022August 2025Allow3710NoNo
17850811INTEGRATED CIRCUIT WITH BOTTOM DIELECTRIC INSULATORS AND FIN SIDEWALL SPACERS FOR REDUCING SOURCE/DRAIN LEAKAGE CURRENTSJune 2022October 2025Allow3911YesNo
17843483MEMS DEVICE COMPRISING AN INSULATED SUSPENDED DIAPHRAGM, IN PARTICULAR PRESSURE SENSOR, AND MANUFACTURING PROCESS THEREOFJune 2022August 2025Allow3811YesNo
17842771SEMICONDUCTOR POWER DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAMEJune 2022May 2025Allow3511NoNo
17837786INTEGRATED CIRCUIT INCLUDING HIGH-SPEED DEVICEJune 2022July 2025Allow3720YesNo
17835977SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOFJune 2022June 2025Allow3611NoNo
17835956COMPOUND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND FABRICATION METHOD THEREOFJune 2022August 2025Allow3921YesNo
17830482SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH REDISTRIBUTION PLUGSJune 2022April 2025Allow3411YesNo
17750463SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAMEMay 2022September 2025Abandon4011NoNo
17664335REGENERATION ANNEAL OF METAL OXIDE THIN-FILM TRANSISTORSMay 2022June 2025Allow3711YesNo
17777452MAGNETIC RECORDING ARRAY AND RESERVOIR ELEMENTMay 2022September 2025Allow4011NoNo
176635411T1R MEMORY WITH A 3D STRUCTUREMay 2022December 2025Allow4321NoNo
17735887THERMAL SENSOR USING INVERSION DIFFUSIVITY RESISTANCEMay 2022September 2025Allow4111NoNo
17710817INTEGRATED CIRCUIT STRUCTURES WITH PRE-EPITAXIAL DEEP VIA STRUCTUREMarch 2022January 2026Allow4611NoNo
17691749SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE MANUFACTURING METHODMarch 2022February 2026Allow4731NoNo
17691680SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICEMarch 2022June 2025Allow3920YesNo
17689850SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICEMarch 2022September 2025Allow4221NoNo
17653476CONTACT RESISTANCE OF NANOSHEET TRANSISTORMarch 2022December 2025Allow4551YesNo
17683069MODULEFebruary 2022September 2025Allow4221YesNo
17583733SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES, MEMORY DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR FORMING THE SAMEJanuary 2022October 2025Allow4531YesNo
17648722SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOFJanuary 2022April 2025Allow3911NoNo
17648714SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAMEJanuary 2022May 2025Allow3911NoNo
17569513STRETCHABLE DISPLAY DEVICEJanuary 2022June 2025Allow4121NoNo
17484299CONFORMAL POWER DELIVERY STRUCTURES NEAR HIGH-SPEED SIGNAL TRACESSeptember 2021October 2025Allow4911YesNo
17448382CMOS ARCHITECTURE WITH THERMALLY STABLE SILICIDE GATE WORKFUNCTION METALSeptember 2021October 2025Allow4921YesNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner GREAVING, JASON JAMES - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner GREAVING, JASON JAMES works in Art Unit 2893 and has examined 2 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 49 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner GREAVING, JASON JAMES's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 97% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by GREAVING, JASON JAMES receive 1.50 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 26% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by GREAVING, JASON JAMES is 49 months. This places the examiner in the 7% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 50.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 97% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 2% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 28% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 33% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Plan for RCE after final rejection: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments. Budget for an RCE in your prosecution strategy if you receive a final rejection.
  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.