Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18806478 | HERMETIC MICROELECTRONIC MODULE USING A SHEATH | August 2024 | August 2025 | Allow | 12 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 18523716 | Display Device | November 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18221420 | DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE | July 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 18295627 | ELECTROLUMINESCENT DISPLAY DEVICE | April 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18178660 | Semiconductor Device and Method | March 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17894579 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME | August 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17760461 | DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE | August 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 42 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17795548 | DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE | July 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 39 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17873159 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE, BIOSENSOR, BIOSENSOR ARRAY, AND LOGIC CIRCUIT | July 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17871882 | METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE | July 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17759134 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE | July 2022 | December 2025 | Abandon | 41 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17864353 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE | July 2022 | February 2026 | Abandon | 43 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17808709 | Mechanisms for Forming FinFET Device | June 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17848050 | INTEGRATED ELECTRONIC DEVICE WITH A PAD STRUCTURE INCLUDING A BARRIER STRUCTURE AND RELATED MANUFACTURING PROCESS | June 2022 | February 2026 | Abandon | 43 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17837940 | Integrated Circuit Packages and Methods of Forming Same | June 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 43 | 3 | 1 | No | No |
| 17833099 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH PATTERNED GROUND SHIELDING | June 2022 | July 2024 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17658335 | Tiled Lateral Thyristor | April 2022 | March 2024 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17655832 | Method for Manufacturing Ferromagnetic-Dielectric Composite Material | March 2022 | May 2024 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17590611 | FLEXIBLE DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME | February 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 41 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17563607 | CONFORMAL DIELECTRIC CAP FOR SUBTRACTIVE VIAS | December 2021 | January 2026 | Allow | 49 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17489910 | INTEGRATION SCHEME TO BUILD RESISTOR, CAPACITOR, EFUSE USING SILICON-RICH DIELECTRIC LAYER AS A BASE DIELECTRIC | September 2021 | August 2025 | Allow | 47 | 3 | 1 | No | No |
| 17353547 | METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE | June 2021 | February 2025 | Allow | 44 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17317229 | ORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING DISPLAY APPARATUS | May 2021 | April 2025 | Allow | 48 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17246856 | LIGHT EMITTING DIODE | May 2021 | February 2025 | Allow | 45 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17245519 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND A METHOD OF MANUFACTURE | April 2021 | March 2025 | Allow | 46 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17301071 | PATTERNING MATERIAL INCLUDING CARBON-CONTAINING LAYER AND METHOD FOR SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE FABRICATION | March 2021 | January 2026 | Allow | 58 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17202675 | RUTHENIUM ETCHING PROCESS | March 2021 | October 2025 | Abandon | 55 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 17183814 | METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE | February 2021 | August 2024 | Abandon | 42 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 17155520 | SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE WITH WETTABLE FLANK | January 2021 | August 2025 | Allow | 55 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17145500 | MULTIPLE PATTERNING WITH SELECTIVE MANDREL FORMATION | January 2021 | December 2025 | Allow | 59 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17138741 | RELIABLE SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGES | December 2020 | June 2024 | Abandon | 41 | 3 | 1 | No | No |
| 17121320 | Thin Film Transistor and Display Device Including the Same | December 2020 | April 2025 | Allow | 52 | 5 | 1 | No | No |
| 17117283 | LEADFRAME PACKAGE WITH ADJUSTABLE CLIP | December 2020 | March 2024 | Allow | 39 | 3 | 1 | No | No |
| 17099979 | THIN SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF | November 2020 | June 2024 | Abandon | 43 | 4 | 1 | No | No |
| 17069513 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES | October 2020 | May 2025 | Allow | 55 | 5 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16990516 | LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE AND DISPLAY APPARATUS INCLUDING THE SAME | August 2020 | November 2023 | Allow | 39 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16983059 | SILICON MEMBER AND METHOD OF PRODUCING THE SAME | August 2020 | May 2025 | Abandon | 57 | 7 | 0 | No | No |
| 16966116 | TOUCH ARRAY SUBSTRATE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF | July 2020 | April 2024 | Allow | 44 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 16937367 | DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAME | July 2020 | December 2025 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16964167 | DISPLAY DEVICE | July 2020 | September 2025 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 16924200 | SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND METHODS OF FORMING THE SAME | July 2020 | January 2024 | Allow | 43 | 4 | 1 | No | No |
| 16782882 | REPLACEMENT BURIED POWER RAIL IN BACKSIDE POWER DELIVERY | February 2020 | March 2025 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16475287 | POWER SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING POWER SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE | July 2019 | October 2024 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16454178 | HIGH K METAL GATE STACK WITH SINGLE WORK-FUNCTION METAL | June 2019 | January 2026 | Abandon | 60 | 9 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16186404 | SEMICONDUCTOR NANOPARTICLES, AND DISPLAY DEVICE AND OLED DISPLAY DEVICE COMPRISING THE SAME | November 2018 | September 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 10 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15410312 | Light-Emitting Panel, Display Device, and Method for Manufacturing Light-Emitting Panel | January 2017 | August 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 9 | 0 | No | No |
| 15157197 | THROUGH-DIELECTRIC-VIAS (TDVs) FOR 3D INTEGRATED CIRCUITS IN SILICON | May 2016 | April 2024 | Allow | 60 | 8 | 1 | No | No |
| 14998270 | Technologies for adaptive bandwidth reduction | December 2015 | August 2024 | Allow | 60 | 7 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 14642129 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME | March 2015 | January 2019 | Allow | 47 | 3 | 1 | No | No |
| 14471812 | METHOD OF FORMING A SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE INCLUDING A FERROELECTRIC MATERIAL AND SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE INCLUDING A FERROELECTRIC TRANSISTOR | August 2014 | April 2016 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 14197649 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH LOW-K GATE CAP AND SELF-ALIGNED CONTACT | March 2014 | December 2015 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14063927 | THIN FILM TRANSISTOR ARRAY PANEL AND ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING DIODE DISPLAY INCLUDING THE SAME | October 2013 | February 2016 | Allow | 28 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14059842 | ANISOTROPIC DIELECTRIC MATERIAL GATE SPACER FOR A FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTOR | October 2013 | April 2016 | Allow | 29 | 3 | 1 | Yes | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner CIESLEWICZ, ANETA B.
With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner CIESLEWICZ, ANETA B works in Art Unit 2893 and has examined 34 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 76.5%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 49 months.
Examiner CIESLEWICZ, ANETA B's allowance rate of 76.5% places them in the 43% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by CIESLEWICZ, ANETA B receive 4.62 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 99% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by CIESLEWICZ, ANETA B is 49 months. This places the examiner in the 7% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +20.8% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by CIESLEWICZ, ANETA B. This interview benefit is in the 65% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 15.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 12% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 12.2% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 12% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 50.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 18% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 28% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 7.7% of allowed cases (in the 86% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.