Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18067910 | METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING DISPLAY PANEL, DISPLAY PANEL, AND DISPLAY APPARATUS | December 2022 | June 2023 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17138541 | THERMALLY CONDUCTIVE WAFER LAYER | December 2020 | November 2022 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 17136319 | METHOD OF REDUCING RESIDUAL CONTAMINATION IN SINGULATED SEMICONDUCTOR DIE | December 2020 | June 2023 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17130486 | LASER CLEANING METHOD AND DEVICE FOR IMPROVING UNIFORMITY OF LASER CLEANING SURFACE | December 2020 | October 2023 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17125917 | SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGES WITHOUT DEBRIS | December 2020 | January 2023 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17247504 | Arrangement With Central Carrier And Two Opposing Layer Stacks, Component Carrier and Manufacturing Method | December 2020 | February 2023 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17117352 | PHOTOELECTRIC DEVICE | December 2020 | January 2023 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17110837 | SELECTIVE MOLD PLACEMENT ON INTEGRATED CIRCUIT (IC) PACKAGES AND METHODS OF FABRICATING | December 2020 | May 2023 | Allow | 29 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17047686 | LASER DEVICE FOR SKIN TREATMENT | October 2020 | December 2023 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17060248 | WIRING BOARD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE MODULE | October 2020 | January 2023 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17037676 | High PRF, High Efficiency Laser Diode Driver Power Supply | September 2020 | October 2023 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17043144 | A SURFACE-EMITTING LASER DEVICE AND LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME | September 2020 | November 2023 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17043281 | DRIVING CURRENT CORRECTION METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MULTIPLE LASER DEVICES, AND LASER PROJECTOR | September 2020 | December 2023 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17035664 | H-Bridge Integrated Laser Driver | September 2020 | November 2023 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16979606 | SEMICONDUCTOR LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE | September 2020 | November 2023 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17002069 | FINGERPRINT IDENTIFICATION CHIP PACKAGE AND METHOD FOR MAKING SAME | August 2020 | August 2023 | Abandon | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16991086 | OPTICAL MODULE, METHOD FOR CONTROLLING WAVELENGTH THEREOF, AND METHOD FOR CALIBRATION THEREOF | August 2020 | November 2023 | Allow | 39 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16986343 | REFLECTION FILTER DEVICE AND WAVELENGTH-TUNABLE LASER DEVICE | August 2020 | October 2023 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16984345 | WAVELENGTH-TUNABLE LASER AND OPTICAL MODULE | August 2020 | October 2023 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16918995 | PARTICLE CAPTURE USING TRANSFER STAMP | July 2020 | January 2023 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 16900039 | Multi-Stage, Multi-Zone Substrate Positioning Systems | June 2020 | January 2023 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16766424 | MATERIALS FOR ORGANIC ELETROLUMINESCENT DEVICES | May 2020 | October 2022 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16821899 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES | March 2020 | July 2021 | Allow | 16 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 16596367 | NO MOLD SHELF PACKAGE DESIGN AND PROCESS FLOW FOR ADVANCED PACKAGE ARCHITECTURES | October 2019 | October 2023 | Allow | 48 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 16554789 | DECOUPLING LAYER TO REDUCE UNDERFILL STRESS IN SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES | August 2019 | March 2023 | Allow | 43 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16442801 | PACKAGE-LEVEL BACKSIDE METALLIZATION (BSM) | June 2019 | January 2023 | Allow | 43 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16274086 | CHIPLET FIRST ARCHITECTURE FOR DIE TILING APPLICATIONS | February 2019 | May 2023 | Allow | 51 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15783703 | BOND AND RELEASE LAYER TRANSFER PROCESS | October 2017 | August 2018 | Allow | 10 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15186184 | BOND AND RELEASE LAYER TRANSFER PROCESS | June 2016 | July 2017 | Allow | 13 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner VU, VU A works in Art Unit 2823 and has examined 29 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 96.6%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 34 months.
Examiner VU, VU A's allowance rate of 96.6% places them in the 86% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by VU, VU A receive 1.59 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 27% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by VU, VU A is 34 months. This places the examiner in the 44% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +4.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by VU, VU A. This interview benefit is in the 28% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 35.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 81% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 72.7% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 94% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 4% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 25% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 32% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.