Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17122706 | APPARATUSES AND METHODS FOR CONTROLLING STRUCTURE OF BOTTOM ELECTRODES AND PROVIDING A TOP-SUPPORT THEREOF | December 2020 | January 2023 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17115143 | THREE-DIMENSIONAL MEMORY DEVICE AND FABRICATION METHOD THEREOF | December 2020 | March 2023 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17110027 | POWER TRANSISTOR WITH SOFT RECOVERY BODY DIODE | December 2020 | June 2023 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17055694 | CHEMICAL SENSOR | November 2020 | August 2023 | Allow | 33 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17055820 | SYSTEM FOR COOLING A METAL-CERAMIC SUBSTRATE, A METAL-CERAMIC SUBSTRATE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SYSTEM | November 2020 | August 2023 | Allow | 33 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17047912 | ARRAY SUBSTRATE, PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF, AND DISPLAY PANEL | October 2020 | March 2023 | Allow | 29 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17062625 | SEMICONDUCTOR TRANSISTORS ON MULTI-LAYERED SUBSTRATES | October 2020 | February 2023 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17016877 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAME | September 2020 | April 2023 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17015914 | PROCESSING METHOD FOR SUBSTRATE | September 2020 | July 2023 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17003181 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF | August 2020 | March 2023 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 16906714 | GALLIUM NITRIDE SUBSTRATE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF NITRIDE SEMICONDUCTOR CRYSTAL | June 2020 | June 2022 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16808898 | MICROELECTRONIC SENSOR WITH AN AHARONOV-BOHM ANTENNA | March 2020 | February 2023 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16688344 | Semiconductors with Improved Thermal Budget and Process of Making Semiconductors with Improved Thermal Budget | November 2019 | February 2023 | Allow | 39 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 16013329 | NANOWIRE TRANSISTOR STRUCTURE AND METHOD OF SHAPING | June 2018 | August 2023 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 1 | No | No |
| 15449638 | PHOTODETECTOR | March 2017 | September 2018 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner ALAM, MOHAMMED R works in Art Unit 2823 and has examined 15 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 30 months.
Examiner ALAM, MOHAMMED R's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 97% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by ALAM, MOHAMMED R receive 1.47 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 22% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by ALAM, MOHAMMED R is 30 months. This places the examiner in the 60% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by ALAM, MOHAMMED R. This interview benefit is in the 16% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 41.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 93% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 28.6% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 42% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 133.3% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 96% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 25% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 32% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.