Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18854939 | METHODS, APPARATUSES AND SYSTEMS FOR USER EQUIPMENT CHANNEL ESTIMATION | October 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18845052 | COMMUNICATION CONTROL APPARATUS, COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, AND METHOD | September 2024 | November 2025 | Allow | 14 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18809759 | RANGE EXTENSION OF AMBIENT INTERNET OF THINGS DEVICES | August 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18833978 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETECTING STARTING POINT OF SIGNAL, STORAGE MEDIUM AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | July 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17849359 | CREATING COMMUNICATIONS CHANNELS DURING SCHEDULED OPERATIONS | June 2022 | October 2025 | Abandon | 40 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15192419 | On-Chip Optical Network System and Optical Power Control Method | June 2016 | April 2017 | Abandon | 9 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 13932849 | AUTOMATIC SELECTION OF COHERENT AND NONCOHERENT TRANSMISSION | July 2013 | October 2014 | Abandon | 15 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13620686 | X-MIMO Systems with Multi-Transmitters and Multi-Receivers | September 2012 | September 2014 | Abandon | 24 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 13602799 | Communication Method for Estimating Doppler Spread | September 2012 | October 2014 | Abandon | 25 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13509343 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR RECEIVING DATA IN A COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | May 2012 | April 2016 | Abandon | 47 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13241880 | PROGRAMMABLE PREAMBLE SYSTEM AND METHOD | September 2011 | July 2014 | Abandon | 33 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 12897144 | BLOCK-CODED GROUP MODULATION METHOD AND TRANSMITTER/RECEIVER USING THE SAME | October 2010 | August 2014 | Abandon | 46 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 12923520 | X-mimo systems with multi-transmitters and multi-receivers | September 2010 | October 2014 | Abandon | 48 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 12556023 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR ESTIMATING TIMING OFFSET IN A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | September 2009 | October 2014 | Abandon | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner FAN, CHIEH M works in Art Unit 2632 and has examined 9 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 0.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 33 months.
Examiner FAN, CHIEH M's allowance rate of 0.0% places them in the 0% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by FAN, CHIEH M receive 3.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 86% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by FAN, CHIEH M is 33 months. This places the examiner in the 47% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by FAN, CHIEH M. This interview benefit is in the 14% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 0.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 0% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 3% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 20% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.