Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18750203 | CONFIGURING A GENERATIVE MACHINE LEARNING MODEL USING A SYNTACTIC INTERFACE | June 2024 | September 2024 | Allow | 3 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18399786 | FIREWALL DRIFT MONITORING AND DETECTION | December 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 8 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18529610 | EMAIL FORWARDING METHOD AND APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | December 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 9 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18516709 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OMNICHANNEL TEXT - BASED INTERACTION TRANSFER | November 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 8 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18493514 | EXPLOITING STRUCTURE IN ENVIRONMENT SENSOR DYNAMICS FOR REAL-TIME MAXIMIZATION OF INFORMATION GAIN | October 2023 | June 2024 | Allow | 8 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18358919 | MULTIMODAL NAMED ENTITY RECOGNITION | July 2023 | July 2024 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18110859 | AUTOMATICALLY INCREMENTED READ-WATERMARK | February 2023 | July 2024 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18167419 | High-Speed Packet Filtering | February 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18159118 | WEB PAGE SPECTROSCOPY | January 2023 | July 2024 | Allow | 17 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18090666 | SECURING ATS FROM ROGUE DEVICES FOR CONFIDENTIAL COMPUTING | December 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18062860 | DECISION OPTIMIZATION MECHANISM FOR DEVICE CLASSIFICATION | December 2022 | August 2024 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18060091 | DEVICE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, DEVICE, DEVICE MANAGEMENT METHOD, AND MEDIUM | November 2022 | July 2024 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17980885 | Li-Fi-Based Location Authentication | November 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17865814 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TEXT-BASED DELIVERY OF SALES PROMOTIONS WITH DEFERRED TEXT-TO-CALL INTERACTIONS | July 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17713249 | UNIVERSAL SERIAL BUS (USB) PORT CONTROL | April 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 30 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17646651 | SECURITY PROFILE MANAGEMENT FOR MULTI-CLOUD AGENT REGISTRATION WITH MULTI-TENANT, MULTI-CELL SERVICE | December 2021 | July 2024 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17409394 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR VOICE SERVICE IN AN EVOLVED PACKET SYSTEM | August 2021 | February 2025 | Abandon | 42 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17391095 | UNIFIED END USER NOTIFICATION PLATFORM | August 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 37 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17153561 | MODEL COUNTERFACTUAL SCENARIOS OF SLA VIOLATIONS ALONG NETWORK PATHS | January 2021 | February 2025 | Abandon | 49 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner DONABED, NINOS works in Art Unit 2468 and has examined 4 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 50.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 42 months.
Examiner DONABED, NINOS's allowance rate of 50.0% places them in the 12% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by DONABED, NINOS receive 3.25 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 91% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by DONABED, NINOS is 42 months. This places the examiner in the 19% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +66.7% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by DONABED, NINOS. This interview benefit is in the 98% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 0.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 0% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 33.3% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 49% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 16% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 20% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.