Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18766404 | Method For Wireless Event-Driven Everything-to-Everything (X2X) Payload Delivery | July 2024 | January 2025 | Allow | 7 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17634870 | TERMINAL | February 2022 | May 2025 | Abandon | 39 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17502031 | CABLE NETWORK REGIONAL CONNECTIVITY PLANNING METHOD AND APPARATUS | October 2021 | January 2025 | Allow | 39 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17602309 | METHOD FOR OPERATING UE IN ASSOCIATION WITH DETECTION OF LOST MESSAGE IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | October 2021 | April 2025 | Allow | 42 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17412438 | Identifying Transient Blockage | August 2021 | July 2024 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17423322 | NETWORK NODE AND METHOD PERFORMED THEREIN FOR HANDLING BASEBAND RESOURCES | July 2021 | January 2025 | Allow | 42 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17348496 | TRANSPORT BLOCK GROUPING FOR HIGHER BANDS | June 2021 | December 2024 | Allow | 42 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17289706 | RESOURCE INDICATION METHOD AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE | April 2021 | April 2025 | Abandon | 47 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner ALAWDI, SHEHAB A works in Art Unit 2466 and has examined 7 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 71.4%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 42 months.
Examiner ALAWDI, SHEHAB A's allowance rate of 71.4% places them in the 26% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by ALAWDI, SHEHAB A receive 2.14 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 72% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by ALAWDI, SHEHAB A is 42 months. This places the examiner in the 5% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +33.3% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by ALAWDI, SHEHAB A. This interview benefit is in the 84% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 50.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 97% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 33.3% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 41% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 14% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 18% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.