Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18647398 | SENDING GROUP MESSAGE TO TAGGED CONTACTS | April 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18642029 | HEALTH MODEL FOR CLOUD SERVICE HEALTH MONITORING | April 2024 | June 2025 | Allow | 13 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18697334 | CONFIGURATION METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR VIRTUAL NETWORK INTERFACE CARD RESOURCE, AND COMPUTER DEVICE AND MEDIUM | March 2024 | May 2025 | Allow | 14 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18578678 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR TRANSMITTING/RECEIVING DEMODULATION REFERENCE SIGNAL IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | January 2024 | December 2025 | Allow | 23 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18263682 | POSITIONING REFERENCE SIGNAL CONFIGURATION FOR MEASUREMENT SHARING VIA SIDELINK | July 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 25 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18068850 | LOCAL 5G MONITORING SYSTEM AND MEASUREMENT DATA PROVIDING METHOD THEREOF | December 2022 | February 2026 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17925637 | Methods and Apparatuses for Early Data Forwarding in Conditional Handover of a UE in Multi-Connectivity | November 2022 | February 2026 | Allow | 39 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17939770 | BEAM MANAGEMENT USING ENHANCED SYNCHRONIZATION SIGNAL BLOCK SIGNALING | September 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 36 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17593485 | NETWORK OPERATIONS TO RECEIVE USER CONSENT FOR EDGE COMPUTING | September 2021 | April 2024 | Allow | 31 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12671454 | METHOD FOR SUPPORTING POST BROWSING IN MOVING RIGHTS OBJECT OF DIGITAL RIGHTS MANAGEMENT AND TERMINAL THEREOF | January 2010 | December 2011 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12429748 | REGISTERING A COMMON INFORMATION MODEL PROVIDER TO A COMMON INFORMATION MODEL OBJECT MANAGER | April 2009 | February 2012 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12421435 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONFLICT RESOLUTION DURING THE CONSOLIDATION OF INFORMATION RELATING TO A DATA SERVICE | April 2009 | February 2012 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12334820 | USE OF INFORMATION CHANNELS TO PROVIDE COMMUNICATIONS IN A VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT | December 2008 | February 2012 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner NAWAZ, ASAD M works in Art Unit 2463 and has examined 5 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 34 months.
Examiner NAWAZ, ASAD M's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 95% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by NAWAZ, ASAD M receive 1.80 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 41% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by NAWAZ, ASAD M is 34 months. This places the examiner in the 43% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by NAWAZ, ASAD M. This interview benefit is in the 13% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 16.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 14% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 50.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 75% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 2% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 16% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 20% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.