USPTO Examiner COX NATISHA D - Art Unit 2458

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18943450ADDRESS LIBRARY CONSTRUCTION METHOD AND APPARATUS APPLIED TO CDN, DEVICE, AND MEDIUMNovember 2024January 2025Allow200NoNo
18624933MODIFYING SIGNAL ASSOCIATIONS IN COMPLEX COMPUTING NETWORKSApril 2024April 2025Allow1220YesNo
18589903POLICY INSTANCE REUSE IN CONTROL PLANES OF NETWORKSFebruary 2024April 2025Allow1400NoNo
18415429PERMISSION BASED MEDIA COMPOSITIONJanuary 2024March 2025Allow1430NoNo
18414917Deployment of Workflow Tasks with Fixed Preconfigured Parameters in Cloud-Based Media ApplicationsJanuary 2024October 2024Allow900NoNo
18397199FLEXIBLE REMOTE DIRECT MEMORY ACCESSDecember 2023April 2025Allow1610NoNo
18388514INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUMNovember 2023February 2025Allow1630NoNo
18473763SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATIC AND SELECTIVE REMOTE MOBILE DEVICE DATA EXTRACTIONSeptember 2023April 2024Allow610NoNo
18471675SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DATA CENTER ROUTINGSeptember 2023December 2024Allow1500NoNo
18237016SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO CURATE NOTIFICATIONS FROM UNSUBSCRIBED SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNTSAugust 2023April 2024Allow800NoNo
18221567ELECTRONIC PROCTOR SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ASSEMBLING AND MONITORING REMOTE STUDENT INTERACTIONSJuly 2023April 2024Allow900NoNo
18350121PROVIDING POST-CAPTURE MEDIA OVERLAYS FOR POST-CAPTURE PROCESSING IN A MESSAGING SYSTEMJuly 2023March 2024Allow800NoNo
18338462ANALYZING POLICIES EXECUTED IN A COMPUTER SYSTEMJune 2023February 2025Allow2000NoNo
18328265EFFICIENT RESOURCE SELECTION IN A HYBRID FABRIC AND NTB-BASED STORAGE SYSTEMJune 2023March 2025Allow2100NoNo
18326858System And Method To Reduce Database Interruptions In A Service-Based ArchitectureMay 2023February 2025Allow2100NoNo
18317911PLATFORM-INITIATED SOCIAL MEDIA POSTING WITH FEATURE ROADBLOCKMay 2023May 2024Allow1310NoNo
18196706COORDINATION SYSTEM, COORDINATION METHOD, AND PROGRAMMay 2023May 2024Allow1310NoNo
18301810Deployment of Workflow Tasks with Fixed Preconfigured Parameters in Cloud-Based Media ApplicationsApril 2023October 2023Allow600NoNo
18299061METHOD FOR PROVIDING LOCATION-BASED CONTENT-LINKING ICON, SYSTEM FOR THE SAME, AND COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUMApril 2023July 2024Allow1520YesNo
18162076DELAYING CLIENT CONTENT DOWNLOADS BASED ON PARTICIPANT ATTENTION LEVELJanuary 2023April 2025Abandon2640YesNo
18158596MULTIPLE STATE CONTROL INTERFACES BETWEEN A CONTROL PLANE AND A USER PLANE IN A DISAGGREGATED BROADBAND NETWORK GATEWAY ARCHITECTUREJanuary 2023December 2024Allow2300NoNo
18095079Smart Speaker Media Network System and MethodJanuary 2023November 2024Abandon2220NoNo
18145506Systems and Method for Publication of Applications Using Server-Side Virtual Screen Change CaptureDecember 2022October 2023Allow1040YesNo
18086138LEVERAGING AFFINITY BETWEEN CONTENT CREATOR AND VIEWER TO IMPROVE CREATOR RETENTIONDecember 2022February 2024Allow1310NoNo
18084731VOICE USER INTERFACE SHARING OF CONTENTDecember 2022May 2024Allow1620NoNo
18083962DETERMINING ALTERNATE MEETING PARTICIPANTS BASED ON PURPOSE AND ROLE DETECTIONDecember 2022April 2024Allow1620NoNo
18071269EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS OF CONTENT PACKAGE OBJECTSNovember 2022September 2024Allow2200NoNo
18051298Systems and Methods for Determining a Network Path TraceOctober 2022August 2023Allow900NoNo
17973115METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING AND MANAGING QUIC CONNECTIONS FOR MIDDLEBOXESOctober 2022May 2025Allow3011YesNo
17937042RESOURCE RETENTION RULES ENCOMPASSING MULTIPLE RESOURCE TYPES FOR RESOURCE RECOVERY SERVICESeptember 2022April 2024Allow1800NoNo
17935817Iterative Classifier Training on Online Social NetworksSeptember 2022October 2024Abandon2510NoNo
17942795CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION OF WIRELESS LINKS IN NETWORKS WITH COMPETING OBJECTIVESSeptember 2022January 2025Allow2820NoNo
17941878MICROSERVICE CALL METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE, AND MEDIUMSeptember 2022September 2024Allow2400NoNo
17799282IOT CONNECTION SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAMSeptember 2022November 2024Abandon2810NoNo
17901720FLEXIBLE REMOTE DIRECT MEMORY ACCESSSeptember 2022September 2023Allow1200YesNo
17887594SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EVENT-BASED SEARCHING ON SOCIAL MEDIAAugust 2022October 2024Allow2620NoNo
17885977System and Method of Integrating Standard and non-Standard Network ServicesAugust 2022May 2025Allow3320NoNo
17878370SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DYNAMIC STATE RECONCILIATIONAugust 2022March 2024Allow2000NoNo
17871415REQUEST HANDLING WITH AUTOMATIC SCHEDULINGJuly 2022August 2023Allow1300NoNo
17788945SCRIPT DISCRIMINATION APPARATUS, SCRIPT DISCRIMINATION METHOD AND SCRIPT DISCRIMINATION SYSTEMJune 2022July 2024Allow2500NoNo
17664377AUGMENTED REALITY OBJECTS REGISTRYMay 2022October 2023Allow1710NoNo
17708322DETECTING APPLICATION PERFORMANCE BREAKING POINTS BASED ON UNCERTAINTY AND ACTIVE LEARNINGMarch 2022August 2024Allow2940YesNo
17703314TECHNIQUES FOR MONITORING ENCRYPTED STREAMING TRAFFIC USING UNDERLYING TRANSPORT METRICSMarch 2022July 2024Allow2840YesNo
17641010ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DEVICE FOR PROVIDING DEVICE CONTROL FUNCTION BASED ON INTERWORKING BETWEEN DEVICES AND METHOD THEREFORMarch 2022December 2024Allow3310NoNo
17649210MEETING CONTENT SUMMARIZATION FOR DISCONNECTED PARTICIPANTSJanuary 2022July 2024Allow2940YesNo
17563485AI-BASED COMPENSATION OF RESOURCE CONSTRAINED COMMUNICATIONDecember 2021July 2023Allow1920YesNo
17546942CHATBOT WITH SELF-CORRECTION ON RESPONSE GENERATIONDecember 2021September 2023Allow2120NoNo
17457563SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REVIEW AND RESPONSE TO SOCIAL MEDIA POSTINGSDecember 2021October 2024Abandon3510NoNo
17538262Executing A Machine Learning Model In An Artificial Intelligence InfrastructureNovember 2021June 2023Allow1820YesNo
17519414IDENTIFICATION OF LOCATION-TRACKED AUDIENCESNovember 2021December 2024Allow3850YesNo
17412882SYSTEMS FOR CONTENT RECOGNITION AND CONTENT-BASED NETWORK LINK STORAGE AND METHODS OF USE THEREOFAugust 2021July 2024Allow3510NoNo
17386056GENERIC ENDPOINT PACKAGEJuly 2021July 2024Abandon3610NoNo
17379387AUTOMATED SERVICES EXCHANGEJuly 2021June 2024Allow3510YesNo
17330641VALIDATING A DEVICE CLASS CLAIM USING MACHINE LEARNINGMay 2021September 2023Allow2830NoNo
17240586METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ANALYZING ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS AND CUSTOMER INFORMATION TO RECOGNIZE AND MITIGATE MESSAGE-BASED ATTACKSApril 2021August 2024Abandon4020NoYes
17211445ONBOARDING DISTRIBUTED CONTROL NODE USING SECONDARY CHANNELMarch 2021May 2024Allow3810YesNo
17277521Device and Method for Assisting SNS Consultation, and Program ThereforMarch 2021December 2023Allow3330YesNo
17191299METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR INFORMATION PROCESSINGMarch 2021April 2024Allow3820NoNo
17179964METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR FEDERATED LEARNINGFebruary 2021October 2024Allow4420NoNo
17133337PERMISSION BASED MEDIA COMPOSITIONDecember 2020October 2023Allow3450NoNo
16995326Modifying Signal Associations in Complex Computing NetworksAugust 2020June 2024Abandon4660NoYes
16940549Systems and methods for troubleshooting and performance analysis of cloud-based servicesJuly 2020November 2023Allow4060NoNo
16772085METHOD, SYSTEM AND APPARATUS FOR MULTICAST SESSION MANAGEMENT IN 5G COMMUNICATION NETWORKJune 2020December 2023Allow4231NoNo
16877976PERSONA BASED PRIVACY BROWSERMay 2020June 2023Allow3740NoNo
16723076PLATFORM SYSTEM AND METHODDecember 2019October 2024Allow5750YesNo
15837973CLIENT SELECTION IN A DISTRIBUTED STRICT QUEUEDecember 2017August 2018Allow800NoNo
15833563DISTRIBUTED GLOBAL DATA VAULTING MECHANISM FOR GRID BASED STORAGEDecember 2017July 2018Allow810YesNo
15671068DYNAMIC FORMATTING OF MESSAGES FOR MULTIPLE ENDPOINTSAugust 2017April 2018Allow800NoNo
15334551DISTRIBUTED DATA STORAGEOctober 2016October 2017Allow1120NoNo
15224792MESSAGE MANAGEMENT METHODAugust 2016October 2016Allow200NoNo
15183425TECHNIQUES FOR FILTERING CONTENT PRESENTED IN A WEB BROWSER USING CONTENT ANALYTICSJune 2016January 2019Allow3130YesNo
15170404ACCESSING DATA WHEN TRANSFERRING THE DATA BETWEEN STORAGE FACILITIESJune 2016January 2019Allow3110NoNo
15168576TCP OFFLOAD SEND OPTIMIZATIONMay 2016January 2017Allow800NoNo
15095502EFFICIENT TRANSPORT OF DATA ENCODED USING MULTIPLE TEMPLATESApril 2016April 2018Allow2400NoNo
14995336MESSAGE MANAGEMENT METHODJanuary 2016July 2016Allow600NoNo
14755682RESOURCE CONFIGURATION CHANGE MANAGEMENTJune 2015April 2016Allow910YesNo
14659208TECHNIQUES FOR FILTERING CONTENT PRESENTED IN A WEB BROWSER USING CONTENT ANALYTICSMarch 2015January 2019Allow4640YesNo
14628171DYNAMIC FORMATTING OF MESSAGES FOR MULTIPLE ENDPOINTSFebruary 2015March 2017Allow2530YesNo
14542256INTER-DOMAIN REPLICATION OF SERVICE INFORMATIONNovember 2014December 2015Allow1310NoNo
14485502DISTRIBUTED DATA STORAGESeptember 2014June 2016Allow2120YesNo
14318216CLIENT SELECTION IN A DISTRIBUTED STRICT QUEUEJune 2014January 2017Allow3100NoNo
14315692INTEROPERABLE SOCIAL SERVICESJune 2014March 2017Allow3210NoNo
14293580METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DISCOVERING COMMUNICATION ENTITYJune 2014October 2016Allow2900NoNo
14293636OPTIMIZATION OF COMPUTING RESOURCES THROUGH MONITORING AND MANIPULATING AVAILABILTYJune 2014March 2017Allow3430YesNo
14205223RUGGED AND MOBILE MEDIA SERVER AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING MEDIA TO PASSENGERS ON A PUBLIC TRANPORT VEHICLEMarch 2014February 2016Abandon2330NoNo
14026493INTEROPERABLE SOCIAL SERVICESSeptember 2013November 2016Allow3830YesNo
13890820INTER-DOMAIN REPLICATION OF SERVICE INFORMATIONMay 2013August 2014Allow1510NoNo
13845525PARALLEL DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING METHOD AND COMPUTER SYSTEMMarch 2013September 2014Allow1810YesNo
13713993APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR HYBRID SERVICE DISCOVERYDecember 2012May 2015Allow2911NoNo
13460848RESOURCE CONFIGURATION CHANGE MANAGEMENTMay 2012January 2015Allow3210NoNo
13427208METHOD OF PROCESSING WEB ACCESS INFORMATION AND SERVER IMPLEMENTING SAMEMarch 2012January 2016Allow4640NoNo
13425666DYNAMIC RATE HEARTBEATING FOR INTER-NODE STATUS UPDATINGMarch 2012August 2015Allow4130NoNo
13424970INTER-DOMAIN REPLICATION OF SERVICE INFORMATIONMarch 2012August 2014Allow2910NoNo
13252009TECHNIQUE FOR ACCURATELY DETECTING SYSTEM FAILUREOctober 2011January 2015Allow4010YesNo
13175952DISKLESS PC NETWORK COMMUNICATION AGENT SYSTEMJuly 2011October 2013Allow2710YesNo
13174112DYNAMIC FORMATTING OF MESSAGES FOR MULTIPLE ENDPOINTSJune 2011November 2014Allow4120YesNo
13174579RESOURCE CONFIGURATION CHANGE MANAGEMENTJune 2011January 2015Allow4230YesNo
13174350Distributed Data StorageJune 2011June 2014Allow3620YesNo
12850610ROUTER-BASED DISPERSED STORAGE NETWORK METHOD AND APPARATUSAugust 2010December 2014Allow5320NoNo
12725563PARALLEL DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING METHOD AND COMPUTER SYSTEMMarch 2010December 2012Allow3310YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner COX, NATISHA D.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
2
Examiner Affirmed
2
(100.0%)
Examiner Reversed
0
(0.0%)
Reversal Percentile
6.2%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
4
Allowed After Appeal Filing
1
(25.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
3
(75.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
31.4%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 25.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner COX, NATISHA D - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner COX, NATISHA D works in Art Unit 2458 and has examined 114 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 92.1%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 29 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner COX, NATISHA D's allowance rate of 92.1% places them in the 77% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by COX, NATISHA D receive 1.96 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 63% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by COX, NATISHA D is 29 months. This places the examiner in the 46% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +8.3% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by COX, NATISHA D. This interview benefit is in the 41% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 30.4% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 51% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 25.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 25% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 100.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 70% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 50.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 12% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 50.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 60.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 77% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 1.8% of allowed cases (in the 75% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 17% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.