Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18757880 | PACKET GENERATION METHODS AND DEVICES FOR ORDERED DATA OFFLOADS | June 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18758930 | SERVICE MAPS FOR DISTRIBUTED NATIVE APPLICATIONS | June 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18680169 | AUTOMATION FOR INSERTING MEETING CONTENT IN A SCREEN-SHARED APPLICATION FILE | May 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18731159 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR NETWORK ANOMALY DETECTION AND POLICY-BASED NETWORK STATE RESTORATION | May 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 17 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18678476 | ENHANCED EDGE NETWORK PEER-TO-PEER FILE DOWNLOADS | May 2024 | December 2025 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18714636 | MESSAGE PROCESSING METHOD FOR IN-SITU FLOW DETECTION, AND NETWORK DEVICE | May 2024 | November 2025 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18671615 | UNIFIED NOTIFICATION SYSTEM | May 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 21 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 18653818 | METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING DATA IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | May 2024 | September 2025 | Allow | 17 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18618245 | METHOD, DEVICE, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR TRANSMISSION OF REPLICATED DATA | March 2024 | September 2025 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18618260 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATICALLY GENERATING NETWORK DESIGN DOCUMENTS USING GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) MODELS | March 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18696057 | COMMUNICATION SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE CAPABLE OF SWITCHING BETWEEN REDUNDANT MODE AND NON-REDUNDANT MODE | March 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18616692 | RESOURCE PROTECTION FOR A MICROSERVICE-BASED APPLICATION | March 2024 | September 2025 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18608366 | SOCIAL MEDIA POST SUBSCRIBE REQUESTS FOR BUFFER USER ACCOUNTS | March 2024 | July 2025 | Allow | 16 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18557851 | CONTACT TRACING METHOD AND RELATED DEVICE | October 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18372443 | OVERLAY-BASED OAM FOR BGP FAULT DETECTION | September 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18470764 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ADAPTIVE TRAFFIC SHAPING FOR AN IN-VEHICLE NETWORK | September 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18546952 | REQUESTING DATA FROM AN OAM | August 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18264813 | COMMUNICATION DEVICE AND COMMUNICATION METHOD | August 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18366288 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DATA TRANSMISSION | August 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18344598 | METHOD FOR DETERMINING MEC ACCESS POINT AND APPARATUS | June 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18259584 | CONTROL OF CLOSED NETWORK USING NETWORK SLICE | June 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18268579 | WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE OF REDUCING INFLUENCE OF AN INTERFERENCE SIGNAL ON A RADIO SIGNAL | June 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18039212 | REMOTE CONTROL OF INTERNET-OF-THINGS DEVICES | May 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18315801 | SERVICE ASSURANCE MONITORING BASED ON TELEMETRY | May 2023 | January 2024 | Allow | 9 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18312695 | METHODS AND DEVICES FOR OPERATING VEHICLES USING DECENTRALIZED COMMUNICATION | May 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18250623 | Methods, Entities, and Computer Readable Media for Error Handling | April 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18249821 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION | April 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18301981 | Provisioning for Event Trigger Based Policy at Near-RT RIC on A1 Interface | April 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18300803 | CONVEYOR CONTROLLER WITH SIDEBAND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | April 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17941297 | UNDERWATER DATA CENTER SYSTEMS WITH CABLES AND ENERGY STORAGE | September 2022 | April 2024 | Abandon | 20 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17824313 | METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIA FOR OPTIMIZED MULTI-DOMAIN SERVICE COMMUNICATION PROXY (SCP) ROUTING | May 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 44 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16916580 | Packet Sending Method, Device, and System | June 2020 | July 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner CARDONE, JASON D.
With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner CARDONE, JASON D works in Art Unit 2458 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 0.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 10000 months.
Examiner CARDONE, JASON D's allowance rate of 0.0% places them in the 0% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by CARDONE, JASON D receive 5.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 99% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by CARDONE, JASON D is 10000 months. This places the examiner in the 0% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 0.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 0% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 0.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 15% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.