USPTO Examiner BOUTAH ALINA A - Art Unit 2458

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18754801Method and device for assisting with unsubscribing from a newsletterJune 2024March 2026Allow2010NoNo
18738081System and Method for Improving Internet Communication by Using Intermediate NodesJune 2024March 2026Allow2101YesNo
18668071PARALLEL TUNNELING WITH VIRTUAL PRIVATE NETWORK SERVERSMay 2024June 2025Allow1310YesNo
18664856DATA TRANSMISSION USING CONNECTION-LESS AND CONNECTION-ORIENTED TRANSMISSION LAYER PROTOCOLSMay 2024February 2026Allow2110NoNo
18628109METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR NETWORK SLICING MANAGEMENT BY NETWORK SLICE SUBNET MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONApril 2024September 2025Allow1810NoNo
18622349MESSAGE REPLICATION LATENCY MANAGEMENT USING SCALABLE VIRTUAL GATEWAYSMarch 2024September 2025Allow1700NoNo
18619928CLOUD TOPOLOGY OPTIMIZATION USING A GRAPH CONVOLUTIONAL NETWORK MODELMarch 2024May 2025Allow1400NoNo
18620431LIVE MIGRATION OF BARE-METAL INSTANCES THAT ARE BACKED BY SDN APPLIANCESMarch 2024August 2025Allow1600YesNo
18620460INTEGRATED GATEWAY SERVICEMarch 2024August 2025Allow1700NoNo
18585632RADIO ACCESS NETWORK NODE CONFIGURATIONFebruary 2024November 2025Allow2010YesNo
18436856APPARATUSES, SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTROLLING TRAFFIC IN A CELLULAR NETWORK BASED ON RENEWABLE ENERGY UTILIZATION OF THE CELLULAR NETWORKFebruary 2024December 2025Allow2310NoNo
18431536LOAD BALANCING POLICY DETERMINING METHOD AND APPARATUSFebruary 2024September 2025Allow2010NoNo
18426799Leveraging Information Gathered Using Static Analysis For Remediating Detected Issues In A Monitored DeploymentJanuary 2024August 2025Allow1930NoNo
18578580METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR BINDING PLURALITY OF ELECTRICAL DEVICES AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUMJanuary 2024January 2026Allow2420NoNo
18410671Providing Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Enabled Notebook Interfaces For A Security FrameworkJanuary 2024October 2025Allow2110NoNo
18393064PSEUDO WIRE PACKET TRANSMISSION METHOD AND RELATED DEVICEDecember 2023August 2025Allow2020NoNo
18541261Using Generative Artificial Intelligence To Interface With A Knowledge GraphDecember 2023October 2025Allow2210NoNo
18563196METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PERFORMING FEDERATED LEARNING IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMNovember 2023November 2025Allow2400NoNo
18559030NETWORK MANAGER AND METHODNovember 2023March 2026Allow2810YesNo
18385329MEDIA SERVER PROXY THAT SWITCHES STREAMING MEDIA PROTOCOLSOctober 2023July 2025Allow2110NoNo
18497957IP NETWORK QOS ENABLED BY APPLICATION CATEGORY DETECTION AND SESSION ASSOCIATIONOctober 2023September 2025Allow2310YesNo
18557467METHOD AND DEVICE FOR TRANSMITTING OR RECEIVING INFORMATION ON BASIS OF RESOURCE IN NR V2XOctober 2023March 2026Allow2910NoNo
18474996INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS THAT DETERMINES NETWORK ENVIRONMENT OF A DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUMSeptember 2023September 2025Allow2310NoNo
18472602Method and Apparatus for Providing Cloud Service, and DeviceSeptember 2023January 2026Allow2810NoNo
18352897ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI)-BASED DOCUMENT RETRIEVAL DURING A VIRTUAL MEETINGJuly 2023November 2025Abandon2840YesNo
18349191RESETTING A PRIMARY COMMUNICATIONS CHANNEL OF A DRONE BASED ON A NEW CONNECTION PARAMETER RECEIVED OVER A SECONDARY COMMUNICATIONS CHANNELJuly 2023February 2026Allow3110NoNo
18219347REDUCING TRANSMISSION OF DATA PACKETS IN DATA TRNASMISSIONJuly 2023October 2025Allow2710YesNo
18343741SOUNDING REFERENCE SIGNAL TRANSMISSION METHOD AND APPARATUSJune 2023February 2026Allow3210NoNo
18039836MECHANISM FOR OPERATION OF 3GPP TSN VIRTUAL BRIDGE IN A CENTRALIZED NETWORK/DISTRIBUTED USER MODEL IN A 5G SYSTEMJune 2023October 2025Allow2910NoNo
18322840Initiating And Utilizing Pedigree For ContentMay 2023July 2025Allow2510NoNo
18198247METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR VIRTUAL MACHINE MIGRATION DURING CONTROLLER OUTAGESMay 2023October 2025Allow2900NoNo
18112978NOTIFICATION-BASED LOAD BALANCING IN A NETWORKFebruary 2023July 2025Allow2920YesNo
18106114AUTOMATIC CONFIGURATION OF IOT DEVICES FOR ONLINE DATA BROKERAGE SERVICESFebruary 2023November 2025Allow3330YesNo
18162474Detecting Anomalous Behavior Of Nodes In A Hierarchical Cloud DeploymentJanuary 2023August 2025Allow3020YesNo
18162247Customer Onboarding And Integration With Anomaly Detection SystemsJanuary 2023November 2025Allow3420NoNo
18161709REDUCING RESOURCE CONSUMPTION SPIKES IN AN ANOMALY DETECTION FRAMEWORKJanuary 2023June 2025Allow2910NoNo
18006708Agentless Generation of a Topology Of Components in a Distributed Computing SystemJanuary 2023January 2026Allow3510NoNo
17964378Cloud Compliance Monitoring for a Cloud Compute Environment Managed by a Container OrchestratorOctober 2022October 2025Allow3720YesNo
17938755Detecting Package Execution For Threat AssessmentsOctober 2022August 2025Allow3420NoNo
14870972INTERNET CONTENT DELIVERY SYSTEM WHICH PROVIDES SYNCHRONIZED CONTENTSeptember 2015February 2017Allow1610YesNo
14442453Splitting of Processing Logics Associated with Commands of Pages in a Distributed ApplicationMay 2015April 2017Allow2310YesNo
14593448DIAMETER ROUTING AGENT APPLICATION PLUG-IN FRAMEWORKJanuary 2015July 2017Allow3000NoNo
14319687COMPUTER SYSTEM AND MANAGEMENT METHOD FOR THE COMPUTER SYSTEM AND PROGRAMJune 2014March 2015Allow900YesNo
14063004INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS HAVING A FUNCTION OF SUPPORTING ACCESS TO MANAGING APPARATUSES, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND METHOD OF PROCESSING INFORMATIONOctober 2013January 2017Allow3930YesNo
14048782CROSS-SITE DATA ANALYSISOctober 2013March 2016Allow2910YesNo
14010124Themes Indicative of Participants in Persistent CommunicationAugust 2013September 2015Allow2430YesNo
13901463MEDIA RENDERING CONTROLMay 2013July 2015Allow2610NoNo
13790746MEDICAL ANALYSIS APPLICATION AND RESPONSE SYSTEMMarch 2013December 2015Allow3320NoNo
13791802CONTENT DELIVERY SYSTEM WITH CUSTOMIZABLE CONTENTMarch 2013May 2015Allow2600NoNo
13772224DYNAMIC QUALITY OF SERVICE FOR CONTROL OF MEDIA STREAMS USING FEEDBACK FROM THE LOCAL ENVIRONMENTFebruary 2013May 2015Allow2610NoNo
13771013MASS GENERATION OF INDIVIDUAL VIRTUAL SERVERS, VIRTUAL WEB SITES, AND VIRTUAL WEB OBJECTSFebruary 2013December 2014Allow2120NoNo
13712941Controller in a camera for creating a registered video imageDecember 2012April 2014Allow1610YesNo
13660065SOFT POSTING TO SOCIAL ACTIVITY STREAMSOctober 2012January 2016Allow3920YesNo
13560684CONTAMINATION BASED WORKLOAD MANAGEMENTJuly 2012November 2015Allow3910YesNo
13356569DIRECT RETURN TO SOURCE (DRS) ROUTING OF CUSTOMER INFORMATION CONTROL SYSTEMS (CICS) TRANSACTIONSJanuary 2012December 2014Allow3410YesNo
13356371PERFORMING MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS ON CLOUD COMPUTING NODE WITHOUT REQUIRING TO STOP ALL VIRTUAL MACHINES IN THE NODEJanuary 2012December 2014Allow3510YesNo
13351779METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DYNAMIC DATA FLOW CONTROL USING PRIORITIZATION OF DATA REQUESTSJanuary 2012June 2012Allow500NoNo
13374468Multi-party multi-modality communicationDecember 2011December 2014Allow3510YesNo
13293751SYSTEM FOR MONITORING ELEASTIC CLOUD-BASED COMPUTING SYSTEMS AS A SERVICENovember 2011January 2013Allow1430YesNo
13118902MASS GENERATION OF INDIVIDUAL VIRTUAL SERVERS, VIRTUAL WEB SITES, AND VIRTUAL WEB OBJECTSMay 2011October 2012Allow1620NoNo
13131582COMPUTER SYSTEM HAVING REPRESENTATIVE MANAGEMENT COMPUTER AND MANAGEMENT METHOD FOR MULTIPLE TARGET OBJECTSMay 2011February 2014Allow3310YesNo
13097964SERVER FOR AGGREGATING SEARCH ACTIVITY SYNCHRONIZED TO TIME-BASED MEDIAApril 2011July 2013Allow2610NoNo
13041939METHOD, SYSTEM AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR SERVER SELECTION, APPLICATION PLACEMENT AND CONSOLIDATION PLANNING OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMSMarch 2011March 2012Allow1310YesNo
13032253METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PHONE APPLICATION STATE MANAGEMENT MECHANISMFebruary 2011February 2012Allow1211YesNo
13008743SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTEXT-BASED SERIALIZATION OF MESSAGES IN A PARALLEL EXECUTION ENVIRONMENTJanuary 2011February 2013Allow2510NoNo
12847195GLOBALLY UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION IN COMMUNICATIONS PROTOCOLS AND DATABASESJuly 2010May 2012Allow2100YesNo
12666659METHOD OF INTERACTION WITH PHYSICAL ELEMENTS FORMING THE CONTENT OF A MACHINEJuly 2010October 2011Allow2210YesNo
12775348FILE BUNDLING FOR CACHE SERVERS OF CONTENT DELIVERY NETWORKSMay 2010April 2013Allow3611NoNo
12775411METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MANAGING BOOKMARK INFORMATION FOR CONTENT STORED IN A NETWORKED MEDIA SERVERMay 2010June 2012Allow2610YesNo
12775398METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MANAGING BOOKMARK INFORMATION FOR CONTENT STORED IN A NETWORKED MEDIA SERVERMay 2010October 2012Allow2920NoNo
12731726SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CHECKING STATE OF ROTATORMarch 2010October 2014Allow5530YesNo
12530368Display-Based Interactive Simulation with Dynamic PanoramaMarch 2010August 2013Allow4720NoYes
12610342ONE-TO-MANY DEVICE SYNCHRONIZATION USING DOWNLOADED/SHARED CLIENT SOFTWARENovember 2009November 2011Allow2420YesNo
12562710PICTURE SIGNAL PROCESSING SYSTEM, PLAYBACK APPARATUS AND DISPLAY APPARATUS, AND PICTURE SIGNAL PROCESSING METHODSeptember 2009January 2013Allow4020NoNo
12562715UNUSUAL EVENT DETECTION IN WIDE-ANGLE VIDEO (BASED ON MOVING OBJECT TRAJECTORIES)September 2009July 2012Allow3400NoNo
12561561SYSTEM FOR STREAMING MULTIPLE REGIONS DERIVING FROM A WIDE-ANGLE CAMERASeptember 2009July 2012Allow3400NoNo
12530064METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR FORMING A PANORAMIC IMAGE OF A SCENE HAVING MINIMAL ASPECT DISTORTIONSeptember 2009August 2013Allow4820NoNo
12548705PLUG-IN TO ENABLE CAD SOFTWARE NOT HAVING GREATER THAN 180 DEGREE CAPABILITY TO PRESENT IMAGE FROM CAMERA OF MORE THAN 180 DEGREESAugust 2009July 2012Allow3510NoNo
12527044METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR STITCHING TWO OR MORE IMAGESAugust 2009October 2012Allow3910NoNo
12540761APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR EFFICIENT MEMORY ALLOCATIONAugust 2009January 2014Allow5340YesNo
12538401CONTROLLER IN A CAMERA FOR CREATING A PANORAMIC IMAGEAugust 2009September 2012Allow3820YesNo
12508048AUTOMATED DISPLAY OF AN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEM CONFIGURATIONJuly 2009September 2010Allow1410NoNo
12502948SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED CONFIGURATION CONTROL, AUDIT VERIFICATION AND PROCESS ANALYTICSJuly 2009March 2014Allow5620NoNo
12367070CORRELATOR SYSTEM FOR WEB SERVICESFebruary 2009June 2012Allow4040YesNo
12366759METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROCESSING A REQUEST USING PROXY SERVERSFebruary 2009December 2010Allow2310NoNo
12320310SINGLE CAMERA DEVICE AND METHOD FOR 3D VIDEO IMAGING USING A REFRACTING LENSJanuary 2009January 2014Allow5930NoNo
12320271INFORMATION PROCESS DEVICE, MUTUALLY CONNECTED THROUGH A NETWORK AND RECEIVING DELIVERY INFORMATION SUCH AS MOVIES OR MUSIC THROUGH A NETWORK, AND A METHOD AND PROGRAM FOR THE SAMEJanuary 2009April 2011Allow2711YesNo
12320212APPARATUS, METHOD AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR FACILIATING COMMUNICATION WITH VIRTUAL MACHINEJanuary 2009July 2013Allow5540NoYes
12320070UPNP REMOTE ACCESS SERVER AND METHOD OF SUPPORTING MULTIPLE REMOTE ACCESSESJanuary 2009September 2011Allow3230NoNo
12273433METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DYNAMIC DATA FLOW CONTROL USING PRIORITIZATION OF DATA REQUESTSNovember 2008September 2011Allow3440NoNo
12258781DATA COMPRESSION IN ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONSOctober 2008December 2010Allow2630NoNo
12231077METHOD FOR PHOTOGRAPHING PANORAMIC PICTURE WITH PRE-SET THRESHOLD FOR ACTUAL RANGE DISTANCEAugust 2008March 2012Allow4310NoNo
12199202SYSTEM AND METHOD TO PROVIDE A NETWORK SERVICEAugust 2008March 2011Allow3020NoNo
12199098SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A SHARED I/O SUBSYSTEMAugust 2008September 2010Allow2520YesNo
12182630VIDEO METHOD FOR GENERATING FREE VIEWPOINT VIDEO IMAGE USING DIVIDED LOCAL REGIONSJuly 2008January 2012Allow4210NoNo
12180396OPTICAL FINGERPRINT ACQUISITIONJuly 2008October 2011Allow3800YesNo
12177538METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR UPDATING INFORMATION ON AN EMBEDDED SYSTEMJuly 2008June 2012Allow4750YesNo
12175142ZOOM BY MULTIPLE IMAGE CAPTUREJuly 2008October 2011Allow3910NoNo
12217439METHOD, SYSTEM AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR SERVER SELECTION, APPLICATION PLACEMENT AND CONSOLIDATION PLANNING OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMSJuly 2008February 2011Allow3120NoNo
12166540INTERACTIVE CONTRIBUTION WIDGETJuly 2008August 2010Allow2610YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner BOUTAH, ALINA A.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
6
Examiner Affirmed
2
(33.3%)
Examiner Reversed
4
(66.7%)
Reversal Percentile
86.2%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 66.7% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
14
Allowed After Appeal Filing
7
(50.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
7
(50.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
78.8%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 50.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner BOUTAH, ALINA A - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner BOUTAH, ALINA A works in Art Unit 2458 and has examined 107 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 99.1%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 38 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner BOUTAH, ALINA A's allowance rate of 99.1% places them in the 93% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by BOUTAH, ALINA A receive 1.97 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 49% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by BOUTAH, ALINA A is 38 months. This places the examiner in the 29% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a -2.1% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by BOUTAH, ALINA A. This interview benefit is in the 9% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 36.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 84% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 42.5% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 65% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 80.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 63% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 64.7% of appeals filed. This is in the 45% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 36.4% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 62.5% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 67% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 23.4% of allowed cases (in the 99% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 19% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.