Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19170013 | Apparatus and Methods for Generating A Technical Debt Management and Data Management Machine | April 2025 | August 2025 | Allow | 5 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 19094601 | SELECTING A CUSTOM FUNCTION FROM AVAILABLE CUSTOM FUNCTIONS TO BE ADDED INTO A PLAYBOOK | March 2025 | December 2025 | Allow | 8 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18291689 | UPDATE OF AN OPERATING SYSTEM IN A SECURITY ELEMENT | January 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18404485 | METHODS, ELECTRONIC DEVICES AND STORAGE MEDIA FOR EXECUTING ASSERTIONS | January 2024 | November 2025 | Allow | 23 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18397572 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING A SET OF ALERTS RELATED TO AN APPLICATION WORKFLOW | December 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18574075 | ESTIMATING CAUSE OF APPLICATION INSTABILITY | December 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18393124 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR RECOMMENDING AGILE SOFTWARE FRAMEWORK METHODOLOGY | December 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18540592 | COLLECTIVE OPERATION AND COMPUTE OPERATION PIPELINING | December 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18568188 | TEST VISUALISATION TOOL | December 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18530055 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ENABLING SOFTWARE CODE FOR DIFFERENT LANGUAGES | December 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18528866 | TRANSLATION QUALITY ASSURANCE BASED ON LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS | December 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18564803 | Computer-Implemented Method and System for Learning-Based Anomaly Detection in Order to Determine a Software Error in a Networked Vehicle | November 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18512215 | PREPROCESSING CODE USING LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS FOR PERFORMANCE PORTABILITY | November 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18507468 | SYSTEM AND METHOD TO DETECT PROBLEMATIC CODE CHANGES IN FIRMWARE | November 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18503159 | AUTOMATIC GENERATION OF A COEXISTENCE LAYER USING ROBOTIC PROCESS AUTOMATION FOR APPLICATION MODERNIZATION | November 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18498961 | GENERALIZED INTERMEDIATE AND LOWER LEVEL SOURCE CODE REPRESENTATIONS FOR STATIC APPLICATION SECURITY TESTING | October 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18382723 | Systems and methods for updating a network appliance | October 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18492127 | INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM AND BIOS UPDATE METHOD | October 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18380348 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PERFORMING APPLICATION DIAGNOSTICS VIA DISTRIBUTED TRACING WITH ENHANCED OBSERVABILITY | October 2023 | December 2025 | Abandon | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18379872 | AI-DRIVEN PULL REQUEST SUMMARIZATION | October 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18484561 | SEAMLESS HOT UPGRADE PROCESS WITH DATABASE SCHEMA CHANGE | October 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 26 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18484163 | TRACING ENGINE-BASED SOFTWARE LOOP ESCAPE ANALYSIS AND MIXED DIFFERENTIATION EVALUATION | October 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18475075 | Script-Based Runtime Assembly Of Object Graphs Using Native Instructions Compiled By An Ahead-Of-Time Compiler | September 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18471097 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR INFORMATION PROCESSING | September 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18369918 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, NETWORK DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR UPDATING NETWORK DEVICE FIRMWARE | September 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18450300 | Method And Apparatus To Recognize And Correlate Screens | August 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18447734 | TECHNIQUES FOR MODEL-BASED ELEMENT CREATION IN EFFECT CREATION TOOLS | August 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18349450 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR INJECTING CONTROL FLOW INTEGRITY SECURITY CODE BASED ON LOCATION | July 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18333683 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS CAPABLE OF PREVENTING DELAY OF EXECUTION OF PERIODICALLY EXECUTED PROCESSING, METHOD OF CONTROLLING INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | June 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18208048 | All Reduce Across Multiple Reconfigurable Dataflow Processors | June 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18252232 | Method and Device for Parsing Programming Language, and Non-transitory Computer-readable Storage Medium | May 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18132672 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR TRACKING TIME TO MARKET FOR APPLICATION DEPLOYMENT | April 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18189731 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR UPDATING ROBOT USING CLOUD | March 2023 | February 2026 | Abandon | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18026301 | A METHOD FOR ASSESSING QUALITY OF OPEN SOURCE PROJECTS | March 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18110835 | METHOD FOR EXTRACTING THE STRUCTURE OF AN INPUT FOR A BINARY PROGRAM | February 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18085084 | FIRMWARE UPDATE METHOD OF A FLASH BOOTLOADER IN A MICRO CONTROLLER UNIT FOR A VEHICLE | December 2022 | August 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17704019 | EVALUATION OF SOFTWARE PROGRAMS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH FUNCTIONAL SAFETY | March 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 42 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17483207 | SYSTEM AND METHOD TO SUPPORT SMM UPDATE AND TELEMETRY IN RUNTIME FOR BAREMETAL DEPLOYMENT | September 2021 | October 2025 | Allow | 49 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16647362 | GENERATING TESTING INFRASTRUCTURE ON A CLOUD FOR TESTING SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS | March 2020 | March 2021 | Allow | 13 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 16812372 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DEPLOYING SOFTWARE-DEFINED DATA CENTERS | March 2020 | March 2021 | Allow | 12 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 16774607 | SEQUENCE PROGRAM PROCESSOR USED FOR TRACING OF SEQUENCE PROGRAM | January 2020 | March 2021 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16741300 | EMULATION OF AN ENVIRONMENT SET BY A SOURCED SCRIPT WRITTEN IN A DIFFERENT SCRIPTING LANGUAGE | January 2020 | March 2021 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16684358 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR A PARALLEL, METADATA-BASED TRACE ANALYTICS PROCESSOR | November 2019 | May 2021 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16595712 | SELF-LEARNING AUTOMATED TECHNIQUES FOR DETECTING THE USAGE OF SOFTWARE PACKAGES | October 2019 | January 2021 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16455379 | METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR RUNTIME MULTI-SCHEDULING OF SOFTWARE EXECUTING ON A HETEROGENEOUS SYSTEM | June 2019 | July 2020 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16398332 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTING AND ALERTING UNEXPECTED BEHAVIOR OF SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS | April 2019 | June 2020 | Allow | 14 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 16372561 | COGNITIVE INSTALLATION OF SOFTWARE UPDATES BASED ON USER CONTEXT | April 2019 | August 2019 | Allow | 4 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 16247668 | UTILIZING CREATED CHARACTER INDEX FOR SWITCH STATEMENTS | January 2019 | April 2020 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 16081358 | TERMINAL DEVICE AND SOFTWARE REWRITING PROGRAM | August 2018 | February 2020 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16102843 | VISUALIZATION OF SECURITY WARNING SOLUTION POINTS | August 2018 | February 2019 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16028637 | APPLICATION USER INTERFACE TESTING SYSTEM AND METHOD | July 2018 | December 2019 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15828710 | RECOMMENDATION SYSTEM FOR SOFTWARE UPDATES | December 2017 | January 2019 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15815824 | COGNITIVE INSTALLATION OF SOFTWARE UPDATES BASED ON USER CONTEXT | November 2017 | March 2019 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15806601 | INTELLIGENT SELF-SERVICE DELIVERY ADVISOR | November 2017 | March 2019 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15684308 | UNDO/REDO IN JAVASCRIPT OBJECT NOTATION | August 2017 | January 2018 | Allow | 5 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15582795 | UNDO/REDO IN JAVASCRIPT OBJECT NOTATION | May 2017 | August 2018 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15187480 | METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR SOFTWARE LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT OF A VIRTUAL COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT | June 2016 | March 2020 | Allow | 45 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 15171612 | SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT APPARATUS, SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT METHOD, AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM | June 2016 | April 2018 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15130812 | SMART TUPLE CLASS GENERATION FOR MERGED SMART TUPLES | April 2016 | October 2017 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15081974 | UNDO/REDO IN JAVASCRIPT OBJECT NOTATION | March 2016 | August 2016 | Allow | 5 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15011851 | PROFILING SYSTEM FOR COMPUTING DEVICES | February 2016 | September 2017 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14966145 | Converged Call Flow and Web Service Application Integration Using a Processing Engine | December 2015 | February 2016 | Allow | 2 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 14956106 | VIRTUALIZING EXTENSION CODE IN AN APPLICATION | December 2015 | April 2017 | Allow | 16 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14953688 | LOOP BRANCH REDUCTION | November 2015 | November 2016 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14953500 | UNDO/REDO IN JAVASCRIPT OBJECT NOTATION | November 2015 | April 2017 | Allow | 17 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14870667 | Identifying Cause of Incidents in the DevOps Environment Automatically | September 2015 | April 2017 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14862526 | DEPENDENCY INFORMATION PROVISION PROGRAM, DEPENDENCY INFORMATION PROVISION APPARATUS, AND DEPENDENCY INFORMATION PROVISION METHOD | September 2015 | March 2017 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14840083 | COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM STORING INFORMATION PROCESSING PROGRAM, INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD | August 2015 | October 2016 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14838979 | PERFORMING DYNAMIC DATA GENERATION AND VERIFICATION FOR FUNCTIONAL VALIDATION OF DATA MANIPULATION PROGRAMS | August 2015 | May 2017 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14824728 | HISTORY N-SECTION FOR PROPERTY LOCATION | August 2015 | January 2016 | Allow | 6 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 14761617 | METHOD FOR TEST CASE REDUCTION BASED ON PROGRAM BEHAVIOR SLICES | July 2015 | March 2016 | Allow | 8 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 14735261 | CALL STACK DISPLAY WITH PROGRAM FLOW INDICATION | June 2015 | December 2016 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14727929 | PROGRAM VISUALIZATION DEVICE, PROGRAM VISUALIZATION METHOD, AND PROGRAM VISUALIZATION PROGRAM | June 2015 | February 2017 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14722405 | Identifying Cause of Incidents in the DevOps Environment Automatically | May 2015 | March 2017 | Allow | 21 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 14719119 | METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND MEDIA FOR BINARY COMPATIBLE GRAPHICS SUPPORT IN MOBILE OPERATING SYSTEMS | May 2015 | August 2017 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14687305 | CALL STACK DISPLAY WITH PROGRAM FLOW INDICATION | April 2015 | June 2016 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14686088 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING SOFTWARE PERFORMANCE INFLUENCERS | April 2015 | October 2016 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 14603912 | PERFORMING DYNAMIC DATA GENERATION AND VERIFICATION FOR FUNCTIONAL VALIDATION OF DATA MANIPULATION PROGRAMS | January 2015 | August 2016 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14591721 | BINARY FILE FOR COMPUTER PROGRAM HAVING MULTIPLE EXECUTABLE CODE VARIANTS FOR A FUNCTION THAT ARE EXECUTABLE ON A SAME PROCESSOR ARCHITECTURE | January 2015 | November 2016 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14588310 | DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING EXTERNAL FUNCTIONALITY | December 2014 | December 2016 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14585771 | MANAGING ASSERTIONS WHILE COMPILING AND DEBUGGING SOURCE CODE | December 2014 | February 2017 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14583794 | FIXING ANTI-PATTERNS IN JAVASCRIPT | December 2014 | December 2016 | Abandon | 23 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14583674 | COMPILER METHOD FOR GENERATING INSTRUCTIONS FOR VECTOR OPERATIONS ON A MULTI-ENDIAN PROCESSOR | December 2014 | November 2016 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14582219 | EXECUTION OPTIMIZATION OF MOBILE APPLICATIONS | December 2014 | May 2016 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14579502 | Generation of Baseline Test Cases for Composite Software Application | December 2014 | May 2017 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 14579126 | METHOD, A SYSTEM, AND A NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM FOR SUPPORTING APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT | December 2014 | January 2016 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14576391 | COMPILER METHOD FOR GENERATING INSTRUCTIONS FOR VECTOR OPERATIONS ON A MULTI-ENDIAN PROCESSOR | December 2014 | October 2016 | Allow | 22 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14570943 | ORDERED TEST EXECUTION TO ENABLE FASTER FEEDBACK | December 2014 | July 2016 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14458272 | MEASURING THE LOGGING QUALITY OF A COMPUTER PROGRAM | August 2014 | March 2016 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14230462 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR EXECUTING CODE | March 2014 | October 2015 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14228868 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR GENERATING VECTOR CODE | March 2014 | February 2016 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14226619 | SOFTWARE TESTING WITH FEEDBACK ACQUISITION | March 2014 | March 2016 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14226609 | VIRTUAL DEVICE FARM FOR SOFTWARE TESTING | March 2014 | September 2017 | Allow | 42 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14192438 | STATICALLY SPECULATIVE COMPILATION AND EXECUTION | February 2014 | August 2015 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14145052 | TRACEABILITY IN A MODELING ENVIRONMENT | December 2013 | October 2015 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13305468 | Risk Mitigation for Installation Wizards | November 2011 | February 2016 | Allow | 50 | 3 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 12797160 | PROCESSORS AND COMPILING METHODS FOR PROCESSORS | June 2010 | October 2013 | Allow | 40 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12061383 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR USING A COMPONENT BUSINESS MODEL TO TRANSFORM WARRANTY CLAIMS PROCESSING IN THE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY | April 2008 | January 2016 | Allow | 60 | 7 | 0 | No | No |
| 11553308 | CONVERGED CALL FLOW AND WEB SERVICE APPLICATION INTEGRATION USING A PROCESSING ENGINE | October 2006 | August 2015 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 11210615 | System and method for generating content rules for a website | August 2005 | December 2016 | Allow | 60 | 9 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner NAHAR, QAMRUN.
With a 50.0% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 57.1% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
✓ Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner NAHAR, QAMRUN works in Art Unit 2199 and has examined 68 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 98.5%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 18 months.
Examiner NAHAR, QAMRUN's allowance rate of 98.5% places them in the 92% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by NAHAR, QAMRUN receive 1.71 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 36% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by NAHAR, QAMRUN is 18 months. This places the examiner in the 96% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +2.2% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by NAHAR, QAMRUN. This interview benefit is in the 22% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 34.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 77% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 56.5% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 83% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 75.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 64% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 16.7% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 54.5% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 55% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 4.4% of allowed cases (in the 84% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 16% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.