Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17132821 | CONTAINER BASED APPLICATION REIFICATION | December 2020 | March 2021 | Allow | 2 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17132775 | CONTAINER BASED APPLICATION REIFICATION | December 2020 | March 2021 | Allow | 3 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17115374 | TOUCH SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR UPDATING FIRMWARE | December 2020 | March 2025 | Allow | 52 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17101675 | SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS CREATING AND TRACKING SYSTEM AND METHOD | November 2020 | June 2023 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16949430 | CONVERSATIONAL USER INTERFACE AGENT DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT | October 2020 | November 2024 | Abandon | 48 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17062826 | METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR DYNAMICALLY GENERATING MOBILE APPLICATION LAYOUTS USING CLIENT- INDEPENDENT CONFIGURATION | October 2020 | April 2024 | Abandon | 42 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17024028 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING A PUBLIC SOFTWARE COMPONENT ECOSYSTEM USING A DISTRIBUTED LEDGER | September 2020 | June 2023 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16990174 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROGRAMMATICALLY TESTING A USER INTERFACE | August 2020 | March 2023 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16892508 | CONTAINER BASED APPLICATION REIFICATION | June 2020 | September 2022 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16881682 | TRACKING AIRCRAFT WITH OLDER VERSION OF SOFTWARE/DATABASE AND INITIATING AUTOLOAD OF LATEST VERSION OF SOFTWARE/DATABASE WHEN AIRCRAFT IS IN SAFE STATE FOR DATALOAD | May 2020 | December 2021 | Abandon | 19 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16862048 | DISTRIBUTED SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PIPELINE FOR COHERENT GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE | April 2020 | June 2022 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16856377 | INFERRING CODE DEPRECATION FROM MODULE DEPRECATION | April 2020 | March 2022 | Allow | 23 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16848217 | SHELL CONVERSION FOR AN ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING (ERP) SYSTEM | April 2020 | December 2022 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16795170 | ESTIMATING THE NUMBER OF CODING STYLES BY ANALYZING SOURCE CODE | February 2020 | April 2021 | Allow | 14 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16743956 | MANIFEST AND CONTENT DELIVERY | January 2020 | August 2023 | Allow | 43 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16743010 | TEST PATTERN GENERATION DEVICE | January 2020 | December 2021 | Abandon | 23 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16715632 | PREVENTING UNEXPECTED BEHAVIOR IN SOFTWARE SYSTEMS DUE TO THIRD PARTY ARTIFACTS | December 2019 | April 2023 | Abandon | 40 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16713098 | SOFTWARE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AND SOFTWARE DISTRIBUTION METHOD | December 2019 | November 2022 | Abandon | 35 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16693323 | MANAGE MULTI-TEAM AND MULTI-SPRINT PROJECTS VIA COGNITIVE COMPUTING | November 2019 | February 2024 | Abandon | 51 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16616307 | DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM AND METHOD | November 2019 | April 2022 | Allow | 29 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 16691979 | CONTAINER BASED APPLICATION REIFICATION | November 2019 | January 2021 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16691469 | APPLICATION OF SCHEDULED PATCHES | November 2019 | September 2022 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16687968 | WEIGHTED CODE COVERAGE | November 2019 | September 2024 | Abandon | 58 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16687444 | SOFTWARE DIAGNOSIS USING TRANSPARENT DECOMPILATION | November 2019 | April 2024 | Abandon | 53 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 16672856 | SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS CREATING AND TRACKING SYSTEM AND METHOD | November 2019 | July 2020 | Allow | 8 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16669390 | Method for managing identity value in software development | October 2019 | December 2021 | Abandon | 26 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16594859 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF MONITORING AND REPORTING EQUIPMENT STATUS | October 2019 | March 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16577479 | AUTOMATED CHECK FOR TICKET STATUS OF MERGED CODE | September 2019 | June 2021 | Abandon | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16561591 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SERVICE ROLLING-UPDATING IN A CONTAINER ORCHESTRATOR SYSTEM | September 2019 | September 2022 | Abandon | 36 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16560362 | METHOD FOR REMOTELY UPDATING FIRMWARE OF FIELD PROGRAMMABLE GATE ARRAY | September 2019 | April 2022 | Abandon | 32 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16556507 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPTIMIZING AUTOMATED MODELLING OF RESOURCE ALLOCATION | August 2019 | June 2022 | Allow | 34 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16552143 | DETERMINING EFFECTS OF A FUNCTION'S CHANGE ON A CLIENT FUNCTION | August 2019 | December 2022 | Abandon | 40 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16552755 | GENERATING SOFTWARE ARTIFACTS FROM A CONCEPTUAL DATA MODEL | August 2019 | March 2023 | Allow | 43 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16551024 | DETERMINING VALIDITY OF MULTIPART BRANCHING LITERATE PROGRAMS | August 2019 | April 2022 | Allow | 31 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16549372 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING A TEST OPTIMIZATION MODULE | August 2019 | November 2020 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16549113 | SECURE FIRMWARE UPDATE FOR DEVICE WITH LOW COMPUTING POWER | August 2019 | March 2022 | Allow | 31 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16547559 | REPRESENTING RESULT DATA STREAMS BASED ON EXECUTION OF DATA STREAM LANGUAGE PROGRAMS | August 2019 | February 2023 | Allow | 42 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16543514 | Quantization of Data Streams of Instrumented Software | August 2019 | October 2023 | Abandon | 50 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16543515 | Compliance Enforcement Tool For Computing Environments | August 2019 | June 2023 | Allow | 46 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16542318 | REAL-TIME REPORTING BASED ON INSTRUMENTATION OF SOFTWARE | August 2019 | January 2021 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16542706 | AUTOMATED GENERATION OF STATUS CHAINS FOR SOFTWARE UPDATES | August 2019 | October 2022 | Allow | 38 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16541647 | USING SYNTHETIC INPUTS TO COMPARE EXECUTION OF DIFFERENT CODE VERSIONS | August 2019 | June 2022 | Abandon | 34 | 3 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16537460 | PADDED VECTORIZATION WITH COMPILE TIME KNOWN MASKS | August 2019 | February 2023 | Allow | 43 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16529633 | COMPILER TECHNIQUES FOR MAPPING PROGRAM CODE TO A HIGH PERFORMANCE, POWER EFFICIENT, PROGRAMMABLE IMAGE PROCESSING HARDWARE PLATFORM | August 2019 | December 2023 | Abandon | 52 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16519734 | CONTAINER ORCHESTRATION FRAMEWORK | July 2019 | April 2022 | Allow | 32 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16511270 | METHOD, DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM FOR PROCESSING DRIVER ON TERMINAL DEVICE SIDE | July 2019 | October 2022 | Allow | 39 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16508370 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATING ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT OF ONE OR MORE SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS | July 2019 | March 2022 | Abandon | 32 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 16508097 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SOFTWARE REGRESSION DETECTION | July 2019 | December 2022 | Abandon | 41 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16505362 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IMPLEMENTING CUSTOM UI ACTIONS IN A WEB APPLICATION USING HIDDEN CONTAINERS | July 2019 | January 2021 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16459879 | INPUT/OUTPUT LOCATION TRANSFORMATIONS WHEN EMULATING NON-TRACED CODE WITH A RECORDED EXECUTION OF TRACED CODE | July 2019 | May 2023 | Allow | 47 | 5 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16459899 | INPUT/OUTPUT DATA TRANSFORMATIONS WHEN EMULATING NON-TRACED CODE WITH A RECORDED EXECUTION OF TRACED CODE | July 2019 | November 2021 | Allow | 28 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16460113 | INSTRUCTION SET ARCHITECTURE TRANSFORMATIONS WHEN EMULATING NON-TRACED CODE WITH A RECORDED EXECUTION OF TRACED CODE | July 2019 | May 2022 | Abandon | 34 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16453214 | CONTAINER BASED APPLICATION REIFICATION | June 2019 | November 2019 | Allow | 4 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16451742 | VEHICLE SOFTWARE UPDATE NETWORK | June 2019 | December 2021 | Abandon | 30 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16447047 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DISTRIBUTING UPDATES | June 2019 | January 2022 | Allow | 31 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16445880 | RECONFIGURING APPLICATION SOFTWARE INTO MICROSERVICE ARCHITECTURE | June 2019 | April 2021 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16446379 | SERVER APPARATUS AND TERMINAL DEVICE | June 2019 | July 2022 | Abandon | 37 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 16470714 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR REAL-TIME CONTROL LOOP APPLICATION EXECUTION FROM A HIGH-LEVEL DESCRIPTION | June 2019 | March 2021 | Allow | 21 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16441814 | PREVENTING FALSIFICATION IN VERSION MANAGEMENT | June 2019 | January 2022 | Allow | 32 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16438122 | Intelligent Migration of Firmware Configuration Settings | June 2019 | September 2021 | Allow | 27 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16432820 | Framework For Checking The Compatibility Of New Software Images | June 2019 | June 2021 | Allow | 24 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16431658 | CROSS JOBS FAILURE DEPENDENCY IN CI/CD SYSTEMS | June 2019 | September 2022 | Allow | 40 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16429147 | SCREEN RECORDING PREPARATION METHOD FOR EVALUATING SOFTWARE USABILITY | June 2019 | November 2020 | Allow | 17 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16427662 | USABILITY DATA ANALYSIS PLATFORM | May 2019 | September 2020 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16465888 | DEVICE, TRANSPORTATION VEHICLE, AND METHOD FOR ASSISTING A USER OF A TRANSPORTATION VEHICLE | May 2019 | January 2022 | Allow | 31 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16425707 | DEFRAMEWORKING FOR STATIC PROGRAM ANALYSIS | May 2019 | June 2021 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16406806 | OPERATIVE ENTERPRISE APPLICATION RECOMMENDATION GENERATED BY COGNITIVE SERVICES FROM UNSTRUCTURED REQUIREMENTS | May 2019 | January 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16392752 | CONTAINER BASED APPLICATION REIFICATION | April 2019 | October 2019 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16337079 | APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT PROVIDING SYSTEM, APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT PROVISION METHOD, TERMINAL DEVICE, AND APPLICATION DISPLAY METHOD | March 2019 | November 2021 | Allow | 32 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16366099 | ERROR CHECKING OF NOTEBOOK CODE BLOCKS | March 2019 | March 2022 | Abandon | 36 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16360926 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REMOTE DEBUGGING | March 2019 | August 2023 | Allow | 53 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16335517 | APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT PROVIDING SYSTEM, APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT PROVISION METHOD, AND TERMINAL DEVICE | March 2019 | September 2023 | Abandon | 53 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16358221 | EMULATING NON-TRACED CODE WITH A RECORDED EXECUTION OF TRACED CODE | March 2019 | April 2022 | Abandon | 37 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16358194 | USING SYNTHETIC INPUTS DURING EMULATION OF AN EXECUTABLE ENTITY FROM A RECORDED EXECUTION | March 2019 | May 2022 | Abandon | 38 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16276353 | ELAPSED TIME INDICATIONS FOR SOURCE CODE IN DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT | February 2019 | January 2020 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16261013 | BOT FACTORY ENVIRONMENT | January 2019 | June 2023 | Allow | 52 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16208117 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EFFICIENT FIRMWARE UPDATE OF MEMORY DEVICES IN BIOS/UEFI ENVIRONMENT | December 2018 | October 2021 | Allow | 35 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16203589 | APPARATUS, SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR WORKFLOW PROCESSING IN A MEDICAL COMPUTER SYSTEM | November 2018 | February 2023 | Allow | 51 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 16196321 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROGRAMMATICALLY TESTING A USER INTERFACE | November 2018 | April 2020 | Allow | 17 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16176445 | MANAGEMENT APPARATUS AND MANAGEMENT METHOD | October 2018 | September 2022 | Allow | 47 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 16057078 | Method and Apparatus for Open Source Analytics for Information Handling Systems | August 2018 | September 2020 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16075690 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR SOFTWARE RELATED PROBLEM SOLUTION | August 2018 | September 2020 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16054125 | FIRMWARE UPDATE IN A STORAGE BACKED MEMORY SYSTEM | August 2018 | April 2021 | Allow | 32 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16053563 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING RELEASES OF GLOBAL SERVICES IN A CONTROLLED MANNER | August 2018 | May 2022 | Allow | 46 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16027748 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGED SERVER INDEPENDENCE FOR DEPLOYMENT OF SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS AND LIBRARIES | July 2018 | April 2022 | Allow | 46 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16027072 | System Optimized for Performing Source Code Analysis | July 2018 | October 2020 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16025643 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DEVELOPMENT AND DEPLOYMENT OF SOFTWARE PLATFORMS HAVING ADVANCED WORKFLOW AND EVENT PROCESSING COMPONENTS | July 2018 | December 2022 | Allow | 54 | 5 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16019215 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IMPLEMENTING CUSTOM UI ACTIONS IN A WEB APPLICATION USING HIDDEN CONTAINERS | June 2018 | March 2019 | Allow | 8 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15943902 | MULTISITE VERSION AND UPGRADE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | April 2018 | February 2019 | Allow | 11 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15913041 | REPRESENTATION OF CUSTOMIZABLE TYPES IN A DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT | March 2018 | April 2019 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15845993 | REPRESENTING RESULT DATA STREAMS BASED ON EXECUTION OF DATA STREAM LANGUAGE PROGRAMS | December 2017 | April 2019 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15845991 | REAL-TIME REPORTING BASED ON INSTRUMENTATION OF SOFTWARE | December 2017 | April 2019 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15831581 | PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD | December 2017 | March 2020 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15832691 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROGRAMMING A CREDENTIAL READER | December 2017 | September 2021 | Allow | 45 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 15830241 | INFERRING CODE DEPRECATION FROM MODULE DEPRECATION | December 2017 | March 2020 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15829684 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING A PUBLIC SOFTWARE COMPONENT ECOSYSTEM USING A DISTRIBUTED LEDGER | December 2017 | June 2020 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15823739 | ESTIMATING THE NUMBER OF CODING STYLES BY ANALYZING SOURCE CODE | November 2017 | August 2019 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15824131 | NETWORKED DIGITAL DATA PROCESSOR LOG FILE VIEWER | November 2017 | January 2020 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15577535 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING PLC CODE WITH A CONNECTIVITY MODEL | November 2017 | June 2019 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15803055 | SELF RE-ENCODING INTERPRETED APPLICATION | November 2017 | June 2019 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner HEBERT, THEODORE E.
With a 66.7% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 52.6% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
✓ Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner HEBERT, THEODORE E works in Art Unit 2199 and has examined 276 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 77.9%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 28 months.
Examiner HEBERT, THEODORE E's allowance rate of 77.9% places them in the 47% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by HEBERT, THEODORE E receive 2.36 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 63% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by HEBERT, THEODORE E is 28 months. This places the examiner in the 67% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +9.9% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by HEBERT, THEODORE E. This interview benefit is in the 42% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 24.4% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 38% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 16.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 19% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 90.9% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 69% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 72.7% of appeals filed. This is in the 61% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 56.2% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 84.2% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 86% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 13% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 16% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.