Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18662894 | DATA PIPELINE CONTROLLER | May 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18402714 | CONTENT BASED RELATED VIEW RECOMMENDATIONS | January 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18189868 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PERFORMING HIGH-PERFORMANCE WRITES OF DATA TO COLUMNAR STORAGE | March 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 35 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18004886 | DATA QUERY METHOD, DATA QUERY APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER-PROGRAM PRODUCT | January 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 38 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17966724 | NATIVELY SUPPORTING JSON DUALITY VIEW IN A DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | October 2022 | February 2026 | Allow | 40 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15716674 | PASSIVELY MANAGED LOYALTY PROGRAM USING CUSTOMER IMAGES AND BEHAVIORS | September 2017 | May 2020 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15717248 | SEARCH METHOD AND SEARCH APPARATUS | September 2017 | September 2020 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner MHEIR, ZUHEIR works in Art Unit 2198 and has examined 2 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 36 months.
Examiner MHEIR, ZUHEIR's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 95% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by MHEIR, ZUHEIR receive 2.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 51% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by MHEIR, ZUHEIR is 36 months. This places the examiner in the 35% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 50.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 97% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 13% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 16% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.