Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19234215 | Managed Design and Generation of Artificial Intelligence Agents | June 2025 | August 2025 | Allow | 2 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 19207677 | SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES FOR ACCELERATING A CONSTRUCTION OF A DATA INTEGRATION FOR A NON-INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY DATA SOURCE | May 2025 | December 2025 | Allow | 7 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18749222 | SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES FOR ACCELERATING A CONSTRUCTION OF A DATA INTEGRATION FOR A NON-INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY DATA SOURCE | June 2024 | February 2025 | Allow | 8 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18583195 | Multiprocessor Programming Toolkit for Design Reuse | February 2024 | December 2025 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18541427 | METHOD OF DIFFERENCE UPDATE AND A SYSTEM THEREOF | December 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18501634 | Automated Detection and Propagation of Multi-System Launches | November 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18481542 | INSTALLATION AND AUTHENTICATION OF APPLICATIONS USING BLOCKCHAIN | October 2023 | December 2024 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18552822 | CREATION AND AUTOMATIC UPDATING OF A SOFTWARE APPLICATION | September 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18474029 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USER-CONTROLLED DEPLOYMENT OF SOFTWARE UPDATES | September 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18457261 | OBJECT-ORIENTED MACHINE LEARNING GOVERNANCE | August 2023 | February 2026 | Abandon | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18233338 | METHOD FOR PERFORMING FIRMWARE UPDATE IN ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND MICRO CONTROL UNIT EQUIPPED WITH FIRMWARE UPDATE FUNCTION | August 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18446729 | USER EQUIPMENT, SOFTWARE UPDATE SYSTEM, CONTROL METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY STORAGE MEDIUM | August 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18363654 | CACHING OF COMPILED SHADER PROGRAMS IN A CLOUD COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT | August 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 30 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18358825 | SOFTWARE UPDATE DISTRIBUTION WITHIN A MULTI-TENANT ARCHITECTURE | July 2023 | September 2025 | Abandon | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18351915 | SYSTEM AND METHOD CONFIGURED TO TRACE CHANGES IN APPLIED COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY | July 2023 | June 2025 | Abandon | 23 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 18142290 | SOFTWARE UPDATE APPARATUS, SOFTWARE UPDATE METHOD, NON-TRANSITORY STORAGE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAM, VEHICLE, AND OTA MASTER | May 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 17 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18190278 | Generating And Formatting A Flowchart From Embedded Objects In Source Code | March 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18189194 | PAGE RENDERING METHOD, APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT | March 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18178767 | COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD FOR VERIFYING A SOFTWARE COMPONENT OF AN AUTOMATED DRIVING FUNCTION | March 2023 | September 2025 | Abandon | 31 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18107909 | VERSION CHANGE SYSTEMS AND METHODS APPLIED TO INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION SYSTEMS | February 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18164710 | SELF-LEARNING BASED DYNAMIC STAGED DEPLOYMENT OF UPDATES | February 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 36 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18105581 | APPLICATION INSTALLATION METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR SUPPORTING SAME | February 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18101949 | Unified Framework for Configuration and Deployment of Platform Intelligence | January 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18151618 | STATIC SOURCE CODE ANALYSIS USING EXPLICIT FEEDBACK AND IMPLICIT FEEDBACK | January 2023 | December 2025 | Abandon | 35 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18003871 | Application Module Startup Method and Electronic Device | December 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18145689 | WORKFORCE APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM | December 2022 | July 2025 | Abandon | 31 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18080915 | MODIFYING BYTECODE TO RETURN AN ADDRESS ASSOCIATED WITH A TARGET FUNCTION | December 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 18081633 | DEPLOYING A PROGRAM FROM WITHIN AN ACTIVE CICS REGION | December 2022 | August 2024 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18080708 | SYSTEMS FOR DESIGNING CUSTOM APPLICATIONS | December 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17987888 | INTELLIGENT TEST METHOD FOR DYNAMICALLY GENERATING TEST CASE ACCORDING TO TEST PERFORMANCE OF TESTED SYSTEM | November 2022 | April 2025 | Abandon | 29 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18055624 | MECHANISMS FOR SELECTING NODE UPGRADE ORDER | November 2022 | August 2025 | Allow | 33 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18053967 | PRESENTED CODE GENERATION OPTIONS FOR DATA STRUCTURES | November 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 46 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17977916 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING A TIMELINE VIEW OF LOG INFORMATION FOR A CLIENT APPLICATION | October 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 35 | 3 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17970598 | MANAGING PATCHED GLOBAL ASSEMBLY CACHE (GAC) METHOD FOR WEBSITES RUNNING IN A .NET FRAMEWORK ENVIRONMENT | October 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17968108 | AUTOMATED CONFIGURATION OF SOFTWARE SYSTEMS USING IMAGES OF COMPUTING DEVICES OR PERIPHERALS | October 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 36 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17935316 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ADAPTIVE FIRMWARE UPDATES | September 2022 | December 2025 | Abandon | 38 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17935286 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FIRMWARE UPDATES IN CLUSTER ENVIRONMENTS | September 2022 | November 2025 | Abandon | 38 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17914211 | CONTINUOUS INTEGRATION AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEMS AND METHODS, ELECTRONIC DEVICES, AND STORAGE MEDIA | September 2022 | June 2025 | Abandon | 33 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17933477 | TESTING ACCESSIBILITY OF GEOSPATIAL APPLICATIONS USING CONTEXTUAL FILTERS | September 2022 | July 2024 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17943647 | VEHICLE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, SERVER, VEHICLE, AND VEHICLE MANAGEMENT METHOD | September 2022 | December 2024 | Abandon | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17931275 | VIDEO SECURITY SYSTEM CONFIGURED FOR SIMPLIFIED CLUSTER JOIN AND METHOD THEREFOR | September 2022 | January 2026 | Abandon | 40 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17894961 | INTEGRATED APPLICATION PLATFORM TO IMPLEMENT WIDGETS | August 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 35 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17891019 | METHODS AND SUBSYSTEMS THAT MANAGE CODE CHANGES SUBMITTED FOR PROCESSING BY AN AUTOMATED APPLICATION-DEVELOPMENT-AND-RELEASE-MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | August 2022 | October 2024 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17871032 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING PACKAGE FOR A LOW-CODE APPLICATION BUILDER | July 2022 | December 2024 | Abandon | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17662876 | OTA MASTER, SYSTEM, METHOD, NON-TRANSITORY STORAGE MEDIUM, AND VEHICLE | May 2022 | January 2025 | Abandon | 33 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17740400 | BOOTSTRAPPING DYNAMIC ORCHESTRATION WORKFLOW | May 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 33 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17735219 | COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD FOR AUTOMATICALLY PROVIDING AN ADVICE FOR TEST PROCESSES | May 2022 | October 2025 | Abandon | 41 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17716869 | MACHINE-BASED SOURCE CODE ASSESSMENT | April 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 33 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17715827 | MACHINE LEARNING-BASED VALUE-RANGE PRUNING FOR DIRECTED FUZZING | April 2022 | November 2024 | Abandon | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17711413 | HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES UPDATE MANAGEMENT | April 2022 | December 2024 | Abandon | 33 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17708358 | SECURE DATA ENCLAVE | March 2022 | May 2025 | Abandon | 38 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17589605 | INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM STORING INFORMATION PROCESSING PROGRAM AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD | January 2022 | May 2025 | Abandon | 40 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17570425 | VERSION HISTORY BASED UPGRADE TESTING ACROSS SIMULATED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ENVIRONMENTS | January 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 37 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17566458 | ELECTRONIC SYSTEM FOR DEVELOPING A MACHINE LEARNING MODEL | December 2021 | December 2025 | Allow | 47 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17489500 | TRANSLATING BETWEEN VERSIONS OF DATA OBJECT SCHEMAS FOR DATA PRODUCERS AND DATA CONSUMERS | September 2021 | January 2026 | Allow | 52 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17461137 | ADAPTIVE FEEDBACK BASED SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PREDICTING UPGRADE TIMES AND DETERMINING UPGRADE PLANS IN A VIRTUAL COMPUTING SYSTEM | August 2021 | February 2025 | Abandon | 42 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17397801 | AUTO-IMPROVING SOFTWARE SYSTEM FOR USER BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION | August 2021 | December 2024 | Abandon | 40 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 17340565 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF PREDICTING MICROAPP ENGAGEMENT | June 2021 | March 2025 | Abandon | 45 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17302307 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DEPLOYMENT OF SERVICES | April 2021 | November 2024 | Allow | 42 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17139325 | KEY VALUE STORE IN A CLUSTERED CONTAINERIZED SYSTEM | December 2020 | January 2025 | Allow | 49 | 5 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16733990 | BUILDING A COMPLEMENTARY MODEL FOR AGGREGATING TOPICS FROM TEXTUAL CONTENT | January 2020 | January 2026 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16376731 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EAGER SOFTWARE BUILD | April 2019 | January 2026 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16257931 | Fields Hotness Based Object Splitting | January 2019 | April 2020 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16106589 | SOFTWARE FIX INSTALLATION RATE MANAGEMENT | August 2018 | April 2020 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15973567 | ACCELERATING SOFTWARE BUILDS | May 2018 | July 2018 | Allow | 2 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15840642 | RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CUSTOM SOFTWARE UPGRADE BY COGNITIVE TECHNOLOGIES | December 2017 | May 2019 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15815745 | ACCELERATING SOFTWARE BUILDS | November 2017 | April 2018 | Allow | 5 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15797069 | TESTING PRE AND POST SYSTEM CALL EXITS | October 2017 | May 2019 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15724676 | TESTING PRE AND POST SYSTEM CALL EXITS | October 2017 | February 2019 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15655238 | COGNITIVE EXPECTED PROGRAM CODE INSTALLATION RESULT ASSESSMENT | July 2017 | October 2019 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15409123 | RECONFIGURATION OF SECURITY REQUIREMENTS FOR DEPLOYED COMPONENTS OF APPLICATIONS | January 2017 | November 2019 | Allow | 34 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15408367 | INTELLIGENT PROCESSING OF DISTRIBUTED BREAKPOINTS | January 2017 | December 2018 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15398808 | TESTING OF COMBINED CODE CHANGESETS IN A SOFTWARE PRODUCT | January 2017 | September 2018 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15271700 | ACCELERATING SOFTWARE BUILDS | September 2016 | April 2018 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15258725 | SELECTIVE NOTIFICATIONS ACCORDING TO MERGE DISTANCE FOR SOFTWARE VERSION BRANCHES WITHIN A SOFTWARE CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | September 2016 | January 2018 | Allow | 17 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15064929 | STORING COMPUTING COMPONENT INSTALLATION INFORMATION | March 2016 | February 2019 | Allow | 35 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15063547 | EXTENDING THE USAGE OF INTEGRATED PORTALS FOR A BETTER USER EXPERIENCE | March 2016 | June 2019 | Allow | 40 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15016789 | CORRELATING CLASS LOADER OBJECTS ACROSS EXECUTION ENVIRONMENTS | February 2016 | June 2019 | Allow | 40 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14813608 | MULTICORE PROGRAMMING APPARATUS AND METHOD | July 2015 | December 2017 | Abandon | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14661231 | EXTENDING THE USAGE OF INTEGRATED PORTALS FOR A BETTER USER EXPERIENCE | March 2015 | June 2019 | Allow | 51 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14660785 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SYNCHRONOUSLY UPDATING PROGRAMS OF INTELLIGENT APPARATUSES | March 2015 | November 2017 | Abandon | 60 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 14659491 | PERFORMING CODE LOAD OPERATIONS ON MANAGED COMPONENTS IN A SYSTEM | March 2015 | September 2016 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14564518 | AUTOMATIC GENERATION OF CERTIFICATE OF ORIGIN (COO) FOR SOFTWARE SYSTEMS | December 2014 | July 2016 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14563884 | VISUAL AND INTERACTION DESIGN INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE | December 2014 | March 2018 | Abandon | 39 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14562900 | METHOD OF EXECUTING TEST SCRIPTS BASED ON RUNTIME TEST SELECTION | December 2014 | October 2016 | Abandon | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14564049 | MANAGING USER ACCESS TO ALTERNATIVE VERSIONS OF A PARTICULAR FUNCTION OF A SOFTWARE PRODUCT FROM WITHIN A CURRENT VERSION OF THE SOFTWARE PRODUCT | December 2014 | April 2016 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14563242 | ELECTRIC PRODUCT AND METHOD FOR UPDATING FIRMWARE OF THE SAME | December 2014 | December 2017 | Abandon | 36 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14562706 | DETECTING METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CONCURRENCY BUGS | December 2014 | March 2017 | Abandon | 27 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14561494 | MANAGING INTERFACES FOR SUB-GRAPHS | December 2014 | September 2017 | Allow | 33 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14557632 | COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM STORING PROGRAM FOR MANAGING SCRIPTS, SCRIPT MANAGEMENT DEVICE, AND SCRIPT MANAGEMENT METHOD | December 2014 | December 2015 | Allow | 12 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14501873 | Unified Intermediate Representation | September 2014 | April 2017 | Allow | 31 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14500664 | COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN METHOD AND INTERFACE | September 2014 | July 2017 | Allow | 33 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14500595 | SELF-SERVICE CUSTOMER ESCALATION INFRASTRUCTURE MODEL | September 2014 | December 2017 | Allow | 38 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 14464960 | TESTING OF COMBINED CODE CHANGESETS IN A SOFTWARE PRODUCT | August 2014 | October 2016 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14380038 | SYSTEM-CONSTRUCTION-PROCEDURE GENERATING DEVICE, SYSTEM-CONSTRUCTION-PROCEDURE GENERATING METHOD, AND PROGRAM THEREOF | August 2014 | May 2017 | Abandon | 33 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 14463179 | COMPUTER-AIDED DEVELOPMENT OF NATIVE MOBILE APPLICATION CODE | August 2014 | June 2018 | Allow | 46 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 14318601 | SYMBOLIC EXECUTION WITH AUTOMATIC ABSTRACTIONS | June 2014 | June 2015 | Allow | 11 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14317077 | CORRELATING CLASS LOADER OBJECTS ACROSS EXECUTION ENVIRONMENTS | June 2014 | November 2015 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14316746 | CROSS-ENVIRONMENT ORCHESTRATION OF DEPLOYMENT ACTIVITIES | June 2014 | March 2018 | Abandon | 44 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14312071 | TESTING OF INACTIVE DESIGN-TIME ARTIFACTS | June 2014 | March 2017 | Allow | 32 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner WEI, ZENGPU.
With a 100.0% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 76.9% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
✓ Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner WEI, ZENGPU works in Art Unit 2197 and has examined 83 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 71.1%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 36 months.
Examiner WEI, ZENGPU's allowance rate of 71.1% places them in the 34% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by WEI, ZENGPU receive 3.31 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 92% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by WEI, ZENGPU is 36 months. This places the examiner in the 35% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +17.9% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by WEI, ZENGPU. This interview benefit is in the 60% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 15.2% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 11% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 14.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 14% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 33.3% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 33% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 69.2% of appeals filed. This is in the 55% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 33.3% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 2% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 13% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 16% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.