Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19274076 | TRANSFORMING PROGRAM CONTROL FLOW DATA INTO SPACE-FILLING CURVES FOR ANOMALY DETECTION | July 2025 | November 2025 | Allow | 4 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 19234327 | System For Identifying Same Or Similar Instances Of Source Code | June 2025 | January 2026 | Allow | 8 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 19041564 | DETECTION OF PHANTOM DEPENDENCIES WITHIN A CONSTRUCTED SOFTWARE APPLICATION | January 2025 | March 2026 | Allow | 13 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 18970673 | COMPUTER CODE GENERATION FROM TASK DESCRIPTIONS USING NEURAL NETWORKS | December 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 14 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18953574 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING LIBRARIES FOR APPLICATION RUNTIME ENVIRONMENT | November 2024 | September 2025 | Allow | 10 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18584494 | Managing Multi-Single-Tenant SaaS Services | February 2024 | March 2026 | Abandon | 25 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18408426 | PREPOPULATED CONTAINER IMAGES REPOSITORIES FOR CI/CD ENVIRONMENTS | January 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 25 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 18474412 | TEST LOAD DISTRIBUTION OVER LANDSCAPE TYPES IN A CLOUD INFRASTRUCTURE | September 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18367955 | SERVICE LEVEL OBJECTIVE (SLO) BASED CONTINUOUS INTEGRATION / CONTINUOUS DEVELOPMENT (CICD) FRAMEWORK FOR CANARY RELEASE INTEGRATION | September 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18223641 | INTELLIGENT CUSTOMER SERVICE REQUEST PROCESSING MECHANISM | July 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18352107 | VALIDATING, AGGREGATING, AND TRANSLATING CONFIGURATION CODE | July 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18350296 | SIMPLIFIED SOFTWARE SERVICE CONFIGURATION USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | July 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18336244 | FIRMWARE DISTRIBUTION METHOD FOR AN INFORMATION HANDLING SYSTEM | June 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18323412 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING ONE OR MORE BUILDING BLOCKS OF ONE OR MORE PROJECTS | May 2023 | August 2025 | Abandon | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18323959 | UPDATING A CLOUD SERVICE WITH FARMS GROUPED FOR A SAME UPDATE DEPLOYMENT STAGE | May 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18322550 | SOFTWARE PIPELINE CONFIGURATION | May 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18196478 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTING SOFTWARE TESTS THAT ARE SUSPECTED AS TESTS THAT ALWAYS PROVIDE FALSE POSITIVE | May 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18139746 | CODE MODIFICATION MANAGEMENT USING MACHINE LEARNING | April 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18303114 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, LOG STORAGE METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY RECORDING MEDIUM | April 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18135761 | MANAGING APPLICATIONS ACROSS MULTIPLE DEVICES | April 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 33 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18246542 | AUTOMATION SYSEM ENGINEERING USING VIRTUAL OBJECTS WITH EMBEDDED INFORMATION | March 2023 | July 2025 | Abandon | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18123580 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GRADUAL MIGRATION FROM A LEGACY APPLICATION TO A REPLACEMENT APPLICATION | March 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18178004 | AUTOMATED APPLICATION DEPLOYMENT | March 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18115272 | GUIDED SAFETY ANALYSIS FOR CYBER PHYSICAL SYSTEMS | February 2023 | March 2025 | Abandon | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18158447 | LAYOUT-BASED DATA TRANSFER BETWEEN SYNCHRONIZED, INTERCONNECTED PROCESSING ELEMENTS FOR IMPLEMENTING MACHINE LEARNING NETWORKS | January 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18098789 | UPGRADABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR UPGRADING ELECTRONIC DEVICE | January 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 36 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 18153621 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR CORRELATING SOURCE CODE COMMITMENTS AND MODEL RESULT RECORDS DURING MODEL DEVELOPMENT | January 2023 | February 2025 | Abandon | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18147343 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATIC SELF-CONFIGURATION OF CUSTOMER-SPECIFIC DEPLOYMENT OF SET OF ENTERPRISE SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS | December 2022 | August 2024 | Allow | 20 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18000040 | INFORMATION UPDATE SYSTEM | November 2022 | July 2025 | Abandon | 32 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17993619 | Application Debugging Method and System, Device, and Medium | November 2022 | January 2026 | Abandon | 48 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17987353 | MULTICELL DOCUMENT EDITOR MINIMOREMAP | November 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 27 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17966572 | SOURCE CODE PATCH GENERATION WITH RETRIEVAL-AUGMENTED TRANSFORMER | October 2022 | July 2025 | Abandon | 33 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17964832 | Scalable Code Testing and Benchmarking | October 2022 | October 2024 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17854662 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING APPLICATION POLICIES | June 2022 | February 2026 | Allow | 43 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17852108 | IDENTIFICATION AND REMOVAL OF REDUNDANT INTERFACES | June 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 34 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17808401 | COMMUNICATION APPARATUS AND PROGRAM | June 2022 | September 2025 | Abandon | 39 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17805282 | SYSTEM AND METHOD TO DYNAMICALLY SELECT TEST CASES BASED ON CODE CHANGE CONTENTS FOR ACHIEVING MINIMAL COST AND ADEQUATE COVERAGE | June 2022 | July 2025 | Abandon | 37 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17674143 | EVALUATION AND UPDATE OF TEST CODE WITH RESPECT TO PRODUCTION CODE CHANGES | February 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 31 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17666371 | RESOURCE AWARE PATCHING SERVICE | February 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 39 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17571808 | Test Account and Test Artifact Management | January 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 44 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17565657 | Dynamic Storage Instance Sizing For Application Deployments | December 2021 | February 2026 | Abandon | 49 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17557953 | SYNTHETIC DATA GENERATION FOR ENHANCED MICROSERVICE DEBUGGING IN MICROSERVICES ARCHITECTURES | December 2021 | October 2025 | Abandon | 45 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17496860 | SDL Verification Tool | October 2021 | April 2025 | Abandon | 43 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17405357 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IN-PLACE APPLICATION UPGRADES | August 2021 | July 2025 | Allow | 47 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17379742 | UTILIZATION-AWARE RESOURCE SCHEDULING IN A DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING CLUSTER | July 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 38 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17160098 | BIDIRECTIONAL EVALUATION FOR GENERAL- PURPOSE PROGRAMMING | January 2021 | March 2025 | Abandon | 50 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17029732 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING SOFTWARE APPLICATION CURRENCY | September 2020 | March 2025 | Allow | 54 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16852385 | METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS FOR PROCESSING AN EXCLUDABLE ADDRESSABLE ENTITY | April 2020 | October 2024 | Allow | 54 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16277661 | ACCELERATING LINEAR ALGEBRA KERNELS FOR ANY PROCESSOR ARCHITECTURE | February 2019 | July 2025 | Allow | 60 | 8 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16162498 | CODE LIBRARY VERSION MANAGEMENT | October 2018 | May 2020 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15972661 | SYSTEM FOR MODELING TOOLCHAINS-BASED SOURCE REPOSITORY ANALYSIS | May 2018 | August 2019 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15788453 | METHOD OF AUTOMATICALLY TESTING SMART DEVICE APPLICATION PROGRAM USING PERMISSION BOOSTER | October 2017 | March 2019 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15661460 | DYNAMIC ARRAYS AND OVERLAYS WITH BOUNDS POLICIES | July 2017 | April 2019 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15362090 | APPARATUS AND METHOD OF PROVIDING A CODING EDUCATION SERVICE USING A BLOCK | November 2016 | October 2018 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15165007 | SYNCHRONIZATION OF HARDWARE AGENTS IN A COMPUTER SYSTEM | May 2016 | November 2017 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14922151 | CONTROL FLOW GRAPH FLATTENING DEVICE AND METHOD | October 2015 | November 2017 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14876065 | INTERFACE METHOD RESOLUTION IN OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING MODELS | October 2015 | December 2016 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14839256 | DYNAMIC SHARING OF UNUSED BANDWIDTH CAPACITY OF VIRTUALIZED INPUT/OUTPUT ADAPTERS | August 2015 | August 2016 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14550864 | SYSTEM, METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR CALCULATING RISK ASSOCIATED WITH A SOFTWARE TESTING PROJECT | November 2014 | January 2016 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14378161 | VEHICLE ELECTRONIC CONTROL DEVICE AND DATA-RECEIVING METHOD | August 2014 | May 2016 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14335496 | ALLOCATING STORAGE FOR VIRTUAL MACHINE INSTANCES BASED ON INPUT/OUTPUT (I/O) USAGE RATE OF THE DISK EXTENTS STORED IN AN I/O PROFILE OF A PREVIOUS INCARNATION OF THE VIRTUAL MACHINE | July 2014 | April 2016 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14321671 | System and Method for Implementing Workflow Management Using Messaging | July 2014 | June 2016 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14302921 | CHECKPOINTING FOR A HYBRID COMPUTING NODE | June 2014 | October 2015 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14204043 | SERVER, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT | March 2014 | August 2016 | Allow | 36 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14200477 | Stack Data Management for Software Managed Multi-Core Processors | March 2014 | February 2015 | Allow | 11 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14237316 | SYSTEM FOR ENERGY SAVING IN COMPANY DATA CENTERS | March 2014 | December 2015 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13942846 | PROFILE-BASED GLOBAL LIVE-RANGE SPLITTING | July 2013 | September 2014 | Allow | 14 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13942931 | PROFILE-BASED GLOBAL LIVE-RANGE SPLITTING | July 2013 | September 2014 | Allow | 14 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13909678 | ABSTRACTION-GUIDED SYNTHESIS | June 2013 | March 2015 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13617863 | AUTOMATED MERGING IN A SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT | September 2012 | July 2015 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13615927 | DYNAMIC ARRAYS AND OVERLAYS WITH BOUNDS POLICIES | September 2012 | March 2014 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13597641 | SECURE FIRMWARE UPDATES | August 2012 | August 2015 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13479026 | RETURN ADDRESS OPTIMISATION FOR A DYNAMIC CODE TRANSLATOR | May 2012 | July 2014 | Allow | 25 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 13226616 | Configuring a State Diagram with Graphical Source Code | September 2011 | October 2013 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13223842 | Pattern Implementation Technique | September 2011 | October 2013 | Allow | 25 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13085388 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ACCESSING DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING COMPONENTS THROUGH THE INTERNET | April 2011 | October 2017 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 12913822 | PARALLELIZATION METHOD, SYSTEM AND PROGRAM | October 2010 | October 2013 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12771460 | AUTOMATIC PARALLELIZATION USING BINARY REWRITING | April 2010 | October 2013 | Allow | 41 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12762002 | ABSTRACTION-GUIDED SYNTHESIS | April 2010 | March 2013 | Allow | 35 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12608609 | ASSISTING SERVER MIGRATION | October 2009 | May 2014 | Allow | 55 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12502519 | FAULT DETECTION AND LOCALIZATION IN DYNAMIC SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS | July 2009 | September 2014 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12468511 | APPARATUS, METHOD, AND SYSTEM OF ASSISTING SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT | May 2009 | August 2012 | Allow | 39 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12514430 | JAVA BYTECODE TRANSLATING METHOD | May 2009 | July 2012 | Allow | 39 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 12239526 | SYMBOLIC RUNTIME CHECKING OF QUANTIFIED CONTRACTS | September 2008 | May 2012 | Allow | 44 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12235214 | SYSTEM AND A METHOD FOR CROSS-PLATFORM PORTING OF BUSINESS APPLICATIONS AND MAKING THEM CONTEXTUALLY-AWARE ON TARGET PLATFORMS | September 2008 | April 2014 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 12170990 | MEASURING EXECUTION TIME FOR PROGRAM OPTIMIZATION | July 2008 | January 2012 | Allow | 42 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12125930 | TECHNIQUES FOR DYNAMICALLY DETERMINING TEST PLATFORMS | May 2008 | December 2013 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12103705 | METHOD FOR COMPUTATION-COMMUNICATI0N OVERLAP IN MPI APPLICATIONS | April 2008 | September 2011 | Allow | 41 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 12049309 | ANALYZING SOFTWARE PERFORMANCE WITHOUT REQUIRING HARDWARE | March 2008 | December 2009 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11863703 | CRITICAL SECTION ORDERING FOR MULTIPLE TRACE APPLICATIONS | September 2007 | January 2014 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 11848026 | METHOD OF OPERATING A DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM | August 2007 | September 2013 | Allow | 60 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11832484 | PROGRAM MONITORING METHOD, COMPUTER, AND ABNORMAL MONITORING PROGRAM PRODUCT | August 2007 | May 2012 | Allow | 58 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11832584 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SOFTWARE LOGGING | August 2007 | December 2013 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11801037 | Predictive run testing | May 2007 | November 2013 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11735056 | ASSEMBLING WORK PACKETS WITHIN A SOFTWARE FACTORY | April 2007 | November 2011 | Allow | 56 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 11545229 | AUTOMATION TOOL FOR APPLICATION INSTALLATIONS | October 2006 | March 2011 | Allow | 53 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11483831 | METHOD FOR TRACING A PROGRAM EXECUTED ON A SYSTEM COMPRISING A PLURALITY OF PROCESSING UNITS, AND A SYSTEM COMPRISING A PLURALITY OF PROCESSING UNITS | July 2006 | July 2010 | Allow | 48 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10582211 | METHOD OF GENERATING C CODE ON THE BASIS OF UML SPECIFICATIONS | June 2006 | September 2010 | Allow | 51 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11422099 | INSTALLATION OF A BOOTABLE IMAGE FOR MODIFYING THE OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT OF A COMPUTING SYSTEM | June 2006 | June 2012 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11422023 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MATCHING A PLURALITY OF ORDERED SEQUENCES WITH APPLICATIONS TO CALL STACK ANALYSIS TO IDENTIFY KNOWN SOFTWARE PROBLEMS | June 2006 | July 2010 | Allow | 49 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner UNG, LANNY N.
With a 50.0% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 40.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.
✓ Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner UNG, LANNY N works in Art Unit 2197 and has examined 77 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 94.8%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 47 months.
Examiner UNG, LANNY N's allowance rate of 94.8% places them in the 84% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by UNG, LANNY N receive 2.13 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 57% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by UNG, LANNY N is 47 months. This places the examiner in the 9% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a -7.3% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by UNG, LANNY N. This interview benefit is in the 4% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 28.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 53% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 22.2% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 29% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 40.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 37% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 60.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 35% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 50.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 2% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 9.1% of allowed cases (in the 92% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 16% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.