Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19211641 | INTEGRATED MULTI-PLATFORM TEST VALIDATOR | May 2025 | October 2025 | Allow | 5 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18789134 | AUTOMATED COMPUTER CODE GENERATION | July 2024 | September 2025 | Abandon | 14 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18737939 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DENOISING TEST DATA, STORAGE MEDIUM AND COMPUTER DEVICE | June 2024 | October 2025 | Abandon | 16 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18733926 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR RECORDING TEST CASE, STORAGE MEDIUM, AND COMPUTER DEVICE | June 2024 | October 2025 | Abandon | 16 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18420858 | SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES FOR GENERATING A COMPUTER-EXECUTABLE USABILITY STUDY APPLICATION | January 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 21 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18416960 | METHOD, SYSTEM AND DEVICE FOR GENERATING TEST CASE FOR AUTOMOTIVE CYBERSECURITY DETECTION | January 2024 | November 2025 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18502373 | TARGET PROCESS INJECTION PRIOR TO EXECUTION OF MARKER LIBRARIES | November 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 10 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18382985 | AUTOMATIC GENERATION OF ASSERT STATEMENTS FOR UNIT TEST CASES | October 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 23 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18202473 | SOFTWARE RELEASING METHOD AND APPARATUS, COMPUTING DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM | May 2023 | December 2025 | Abandon | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18320142 | BLACK-BOX FUZZING TESTING METHOD AND APPARATUS | May 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18309967 | CONFIGURATION AND DEPLOYMENT OF DIGITAL AVATAR ASSETS | May 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18182341 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO CREATE A DEVICE APPLICATION | March 2023 | October 2025 | Abandon | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18100989 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING EXECUTION OF CALL STACK FRAMES | January 2023 | October 2025 | Abandon | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18091421 | EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTED STORAGE LAYER UPGRADE | December 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18091160 | METHOD OF REBINDING COMPUTING UNIT IN HETEROGENEOUS COMPUTING CLOUDS AND APPARATUS THEREOF | December 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17979230 | SCALABLE SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DISCOVERING AND DOCUMENTING USER EXPECTATIONS | November 2022 | November 2025 | Abandon | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17920955 | CONFIGURABLE CUSTOM BLOCK IN DYNAMIC DATASET BUILDER | October 2022 | January 2026 | Abandon | 39 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17961847 | API DRIVEN CONTINUOUS TESTING SYSTEMS FOR TESTING DISPARATE SOFTWARE | October 2022 | February 2026 | Allow | 40 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17937652 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REGRESSION TESTING USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | October 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17950577 | ANNOTATION DRIVEN JUST IN TIME AND STATE-BASED RBAC POLICY CONTROL | September 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 34 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17948132 | CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT FOR NON-DISRUPTIVE UPDATE OF A DATA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | September 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 40 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17941003 | SENTIMENT ANALYSIS USING MAGNITUDE OF ENTITIES | September 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17940618 | GENERATING SYNTHETIC TRAINING DATA FOR PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE TRANSLATION | September 2022 | November 2025 | Abandon | 38 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17940038 | PARALLELIZING DATA PROCESSING UNIT PROVISIONING | September 2022 | March 2026 | Allow | 42 | 3 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 17898584 | REMEDIATION ENGINE FOR UPDATING DESIRED STATE OF INVENTORY DATA TO BE REPLICATED ACROSS MULTIPLE SOFTWARE-DEFINED DATA CENTERS | August 2022 | June 2025 | Abandon | 33 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17898419 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED RETROFITTING OF CUSTOMIZED CODE OBJECTS | August 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 36 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17885950 | OPERATOR MIRRORING | August 2022 | January 2025 | Abandon | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17854484 | MACHINE LEARNING MODEL SIGNATURES | June 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 39 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17847297 | Information Technology Management System | June 2022 | August 2025 | Abandon | 38 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17732003 | CONTINUOUS DEVELOPMENT AND DELIVERY SYSTEM | April 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 39 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17520331 | CODING OUTPUT | November 2021 | March 2025 | Allow | 40 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17331070 | AUTOMATIC PORTABLE DEVICE TESTING METHOD AND SYSTEM | May 2021 | March 2026 | Allow | 58 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17209509 | SYSTEM, METHOD AND RECORDING MEDIUM FOR OPTIMIZING SOFTWARE TESTING VIA GROUP TESTING | March 2021 | December 2024 | Abandon | 45 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17202403 | ISOLATED SOFTWARE TESTING IN PRODUCTION VEHICLES | March 2021 | June 2025 | Abandon | 51 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17177149 | VALIDATING INTER-PARTITION COMMUNICATION IN MICROSERVICE DECOMPOSITION | February 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 43 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17248716 | System and Method for Automated Testing | February 2021 | July 2025 | Abandon | 54 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17107542 | METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR SELF-SUPERVISED SOFTWARE DEFECT DETECTION | November 2020 | December 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17085263 | SMART TEST EXECUTOR | October 2020 | April 2025 | Abandon | 54 | 6 | 0 | No | No |
| 15948659 | COMPUTER SYSTEM SUPPORTING MIGRATION BETWEEN HARDWARE ACCELERATORS THROUGH SOFTWARE INTERFACES | April 2018 | March 2020 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15433699 | AUTOMATICALLY ESTABLISHING SIGNIFICANCE OF STATIC ANALYSIS RESULTS | February 2017 | September 2019 | Allow | 31 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 15347370 | FUNCTION CALL VISUALIZATION | November 2016 | January 2019 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15344016 | CONTAINER IMAGES BY COMPOSITION | November 2016 | August 2018 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15193908 | AUTOMATICALLY ESTABLISHING SIGNIFICANCE OF STATIC ANALYSIS RESULTS | June 2016 | September 2019 | Allow | 39 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 15186560 | Utilizing semantic clusters to Predict Software defects | June 2016 | August 2018 | Abandon | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15186556 | Utilizing semantic clusters to Predict Software defects | June 2016 | June 2019 | Allow | 36 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15179131 | ENHANCING A CROWDSOURCED INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT APPLICATION | June 2016 | July 2018 | Abandon | 25 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15178542 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FACILITATING CHANGE BASED TESTING OF A SOFTWARE CODE USING ANNOTATIONS | June 2016 | October 2018 | Abandon | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15140749 | ANNOTATIONS IN SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT | April 2016 | April 2020 | Allow | 48 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15044492 | System and Method for Transforming a Component Business Model | February 2016 | April 2020 | Allow | 50 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14817779 | OPERATIONS TO AVOID WRAPPED MOBILE APPLICATION OPERATIONAL ERRORS DUE TO INTERFERENCE FROM WRAPPER LOGIC COMPONENTS | August 2015 | July 2018 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14817279 | ANNOTATIONS IN SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT | August 2015 | April 2020 | Allow | 56 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14816389 | UPDATING SOFTWARE BASED ON SIMILARITIES BETWEEN ENDPOINTS | August 2015 | November 2019 | Allow | 52 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14790534 | TEST CASE GENERATION SYSTEM | July 2015 | September 2017 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14727469 | HARDWARE/SOFTWARE AGNOSTIC DESIGN GENERATION | June 2015 | September 2016 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 14721994 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING INTEROPERABLE APPLICATIONS TO EMBEDDED ELECTRONIC DEVICES | May 2015 | January 2017 | Abandon | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14689334 | Layered Business Configuration | April 2015 | September 2017 | Allow | 29 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14688646 | QUALITY PREDICTION | April 2015 | April 2019 | Allow | 48 | 5 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 14435595 | COMPILER GENERATING OPERATOR FREE CODE | April 2015 | October 2017 | Allow | 31 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 14683793 | METHOD AND SYSTEM TO COMPOSE AND EXECUTE BUSINESS RULES | April 2015 | June 2017 | Abandon | 27 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14672546 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR UPDATING FIRMWARE | March 2015 | June 2018 | Abandon | 38 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 14663478 | EVENT SUMMARY MODE FOR TRACING SYSTEMS | March 2015 | September 2017 | Abandon | 30 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14659190 | CONTROLLING DEPLOYMENT OF AN INDUSTRY-SPECIFIC SOLUTION PACKAGE | March 2015 | December 2017 | Abandon | 33 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14659374 | ISOLATING COMPONENTS USING METHOD DETOURING | March 2015 | September 2016 | Abandon | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14659313 | GENERATING A DEPLOYABLE INDUSTRY-SPECIFIC SOLUTION PACKAGE | March 2015 | June 2018 | Abandon | 39 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14547451 | CORRELATING TEST RESULTS VARIATIONS WITH BUSINESS REQUIREMENTS | November 2014 | January 2019 | Allow | 50 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 14547514 | EVENT SUMMARY MODE FOR TRACING SYSTEMS | November 2014 | September 2017 | Abandon | 34 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14543355 | REGRESSION TESTING WITH EXTERNAL BREAKPOINTS | November 2014 | August 2017 | Allow | 33 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14398715 | SUB-PACKAGING OF A PACKAGED APPLICATION INCLUDING SELECTION OF USER-INTERFACE ELEMENTS | November 2014 | June 2018 | Abandon | 43 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14499276 | MULTIPLE TEST TYPE ANALYSIS FOR A TEST CASE USING TEST CASE METADATA | September 2014 | May 2016 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14476218 | TEST DATA RESERVATION SYSTEM | September 2014 | April 2018 | Abandon | 43 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14472527 | USING PRIVACY PERSERVING CROSS ORGANIZATION SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT BEST PRACTICES FOR PROJECT STATUS | August 2014 | November 2018 | Abandon | 50 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 14471453 | STRUCTURED QUERY LANGUAGE DEBUGGER | August 2014 | September 2017 | Allow | 37 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 14467665 | SPECIALIZED APP DEVELOPMENT AND DEPLOYMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD | August 2014 | February 2019 | Allow | 54 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 14467905 | METHOD AND SYSTEM OF EDITING WORKFLOW LOGIC AND SCREENS WITH A GUI TOOL | August 2014 | March 2016 | Abandon | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14458158 | TRACE-BASED INSTRUCTION EXECUTION PROCESSING | August 2014 | June 2016 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14336528 | Method and System for Using a ROM Patch | July 2014 | November 2016 | Allow | 28 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 14207293 | PROJECT PLAN GENERATION FROM AN INFORMATION ARCHITECTURE MODEL | March 2014 | January 2019 | Allow | 58 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14184296 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, NETWORK SYSTEM, PROCESSING EXECUTION METHOD, AND PROCESSING EXECUTION COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT | February 2014 | August 2018 | Abandon | 54 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14181791 | MEMORY RESOURCE SHARING AMONG MULTIPLE COMPUTE NODES | February 2014 | February 2018 | Abandon | 48 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14181314 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AN EXTENSIBLE WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT | February 2014 | December 2015 | Abandon | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14178560 | NETWORK CONTROL USING SOFTWARE DEFINED FLOW MAPPING AND VIRTUALIZED NETWORK FUNCTIONS | February 2014 | October 2017 | Abandon | 44 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14238711 | STARTING A PROCESS USING FILE DESCRIPTORS | February 2014 | September 2017 | Allow | 43 | 3 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 14175625 | INTERLEAVE-SCHEDULING OF CORRELATED TASKS AND BACKFILL-SCHEDULING OF DEPENDER TASKS INTO A SLOT OF DEPENDEE TASKS | February 2014 | July 2017 | Allow | 42 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14237475 | TERMINAL AND METHOD FOR EXECUTING APPLICATION IN SAME | February 2014 | December 2018 | Abandon | 58 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14124771 | COMPATIBILITY AND OPTIMIZATION OF WEB APPLICATIONS ACROSS INDEPENDENT APPLICATION STORES | December 2013 | November 2018 | Abandon | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 14036209 | System and Method For Transforming a Component Business Model | September 2013 | December 2015 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13973944 | DEFINING A MIDLET REGION SPACE | August 2013 | March 2016 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 13740634 | IMPLEMENTING UPDATES TO SOURCE CODE EXECUTING ON A PLURALITY OF COMPUTE NODES | January 2013 | March 2017 | Allow | 50 | 6 | 0 | No | No |
| 13730916 | SPECULATIVE MEMORY DISAMBIGUATION ANALYSIS AND OPTIMIZATION WITH HARDWARE SUPPORT | December 2012 | April 2016 | Abandon | 40 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13728681 | AUTOMATIC PIPELINE COMPOSITION | December 2012 | March 2016 | Abandon | 39 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13728243 | DISPLAY APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF | December 2012 | August 2018 | Abandon | 60 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13724202 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRANSLATING PROGRAM FUNCTIONS FOR CORRECT HANDLING OF LOCAL-SCOPE VARIABLES AND COMPUTING SYSTEM INCORPORATING THE SAME | December 2012 | May 2017 | Allow | 53 | 5 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 13806256 | User Customization Method and System | December 2012 | January 2017 | Abandon | 49 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 13720655 | TEST SCOPE DETERMINATION BASED ON CODE CHANGE(S) | December 2012 | May 2017 | Allow | 52 | 4 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 13681474 | POLICY TO SOURCE CODE CONVERSION | November 2012 | April 2015 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13680207 | MONITORING UPDATES ON MULTIPLE COMPUTING PLATFORMS | November 2012 | November 2017 | Abandon | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 13679861 | METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR JOINT SCHEDULING AND LAYOUT OPTIMIZATION TO ENABLE MULTI-LEVEL VECTORIZATION | November 2012 | June 2016 | Allow | 43 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13659845 | PROJECT PLAN GENERATION FROM AN INFORMATION ARCHITECTURE MODEL | October 2012 | February 2019 | Allow | 60 | 8 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13615181 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AN EXTENSIBLE WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT | September 2012 | February 2014 | Abandon | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13547110 | MOBILE APPLICATION TRANSLATION | July 2012 | April 2016 | Abandon | 45 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner PAULINO, LENIN.
With a 22.2% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is below the USPTO average, indicating that appeals face more challenges here than typical.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 31.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner PAULINO, LENIN works in Art Unit 2197 and has examined 167 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 56.9%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 52 months.
Examiner PAULINO, LENIN's allowance rate of 56.9% places them in the 17% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by PAULINO, LENIN receive 3.62 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 95% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by PAULINO, LENIN is 52 months. This places the examiner in the 3% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +12.8% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by PAULINO, LENIN. This interview benefit is in the 49% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 11.1% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 6% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 23.7% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 32% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 100.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 71% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 67.9% of appeals filed. This is in the 53% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 42.1% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 127.3% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 96% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 13% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 16% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.