Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18615344 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING DATA OF ANY EXTERNAL SERVICES THROUGH API CONTROLLED UNIVERSAL COMPUTING ELEMENTS | March 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18390478 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATING TESTING OF AN APPLICATION | December 2023 | March 2026 | Abandon | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18375571 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS OF SOFTWARE TESTING, DISTRIBUTION, INSTALLATION AND DEPLOYMENT | October 2023 | February 2025 | Abandon | 16 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 18225350 | CREATING AN OPTIMAL TEST SUITE | July 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 22 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18337106 | RUNTIME CLASS RECOMPILATION DURING MUTATION TESTING | June 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 23 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18336013 | EXTENDING APPLICATION LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT TO USER-CREATED APPLICATION PLATFORM COMPONENTS | June 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 24 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18038617 | AUTOMATED PLATFORM FOR MANAGING, DEPLOYING AND ORCHESTRATING HIGHLY DISTRIBUTED SERVICE APPLICATIONS | May 2023 | March 2026 | Abandon | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18304390 | ELECTRONIC CONTROL DEVICE, REPROGRAM EXECUTION METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM | April 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 33 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18136506 | FRAMEWORK FOR GENERATION OF ARCHITECTURE MODELS BASED ON DOMAIN SPECIFIC LANGUAGE AND TRACKING ARCHITECTURE DRIFT | April 2023 | March 2026 | Abandon | 35 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18120789 | Productivity Test Automation Tools And Device | March 2023 | March 2025 | Abandon | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18158998 | METHODS AND APPARATUS TO MANAGE A CLOUD DEPLOYMENT | January 2023 | October 2025 | Abandon | 33 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18068016 | REMOTE DEPLOYMENT OF PROVISIONED PACKAGES | December 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18063251 | EDGE ANALYTICS FOR PREDICTING SOFTWARE FAILURES | December 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18062792 | LAYERED CONTAINER SOFTWARE UPDATES IN RESOURCE-CONSTRAINED EDGE DEVICES | December 2022 | February 2025 | Abandon | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18060794 | VERSION MANAGEMENT FOR MACHINE LEARNING PIPELINE BUILDING | December 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 38 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 18060748 | PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT OF DATA MIGRATION DURING A SYSTEM UPDATE | December 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18060364 | Intelligent Adaptation of Source Code for Multi-Purpose Compilation | November 2022 | January 2026 | Abandon | 37 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17937263 | ADJUSTING SATISFIABILITY MODULO THEORIES SOLVER CONFIGURATIONS | September 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17937375 | Automatic Generation of Chat Applications from No-Code Application Development Platforms | September 2022 | December 2025 | Allow | 39 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17931840 | SELF-CONTAINED MOBILE APPLICATION PROCESSING AND INTEGRATION | September 2022 | February 2026 | Allow | 41 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17940597 | PACKAGE DISTRIBUTION AND INSTALLATION IN RESPONSE TO USER LOGON | September 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17929703 | Performance Analysis of Quantum Programs | September 2022 | August 2025 | Allow | 36 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17907802 | VERIFICATION DEVICE, VERIFICATION SYSTEM, VERIFICATION METHOD, AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM | August 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17896873 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RETRIEVAL-AUGMENTED PATCH GENERATION FOR AUTOMATIC PROGRAM REPAIR | August 2022 | March 2026 | Allow | 43 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17893330 | TESTING ROBOTIC SOFTWARE SYSTEMS USING PERTURBATIONS IN SIMULATION ENVIRONMENTS | August 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 31 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17839599 | GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE FOR REDUCING VULNERABILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH LEGACY SOFTWARE | June 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17701694 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD | March 2022 | February 2026 | Abandon | 47 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17582356 | QUALIFICATION EVALUATING DEVICE AND QUALIFICATION EVALUATING METHOD | January 2022 | April 2025 | Abandon | 39 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17456714 | COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT SOFTWARE APPLICATION TESTING | November 2021 | November 2025 | Allow | 47 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17514352 | FAILURE ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION SERVICE FOR AUTOMATED EXECUTIONS | October 2021 | January 2025 | Allow | 39 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17364224 | THIRD-PARTY EXTENSION INTEGRATION, VERIFICATION, AND PUBLICATION FOR DISTRIBUTED ENVIRONMENTS | June 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 38 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17360390 | AUTOMATED LOCATING OF GUI ELEMENTS DURING TESTING USING MULTIDIMENSIONAL INDICES | June 2021 | April 2025 | Allow | 46 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17333894 | PARALLEL SOFTWARE TESTING BASED ON ANNOTATIONS | May 2021 | December 2024 | Allow | 42 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17314193 | TOOL FOR MOBILE APP DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING USING A PHYSICAL MOBILE DEVICE | May 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 41 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17149679 | INTEGRATING CODE REPOSITORIES | January 2021 | July 2025 | Allow | 54 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17002444 | Method For Decentralized Accessioning For Distributed Machine Learning and Other Applications | August 2020 | November 2025 | Allow | 60 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 16213215 | PROVIDING INSTRUCTIONS TO FACILITATE DETECTION OF CORRUPT STACKS | December 2018 | July 2019 | Allow | 8 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 16135912 | METHODS AND APPARATUS TO CONTROL ARCHITECTURAL COVERINGS | September 2018 | September 2024 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16059719 | AUTOMATIC PROGRAM SYNTHESIS USING MONADIC SECOND-ORDER LOGIC | August 2018 | October 2019 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15810519 | APPLICATION CONFIGURATION TOOL | November 2017 | January 2020 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15268014 | CODE-SIZE AWARE FUNCTION SPECIALIZATION | September 2016 | October 2018 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15265748 | Methods and Systems for Generating Client-Server Applications for Target Devices | September 2016 | March 2018 | Abandon | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15205311 | COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD, PROGRAM, AND TRACER NODE FOR OBTAINING TRACE DATA RELATING TO PARTICULAR VIRTUAL MACHINE | July 2016 | December 2016 | Allow | 5 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15194583 | UPDATING LIVE SYSTEM WITH STATIC CHANGES | June 2016 | September 2018 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15194903 | ADAPTIVE TESTING USING DYNAMICALLY DETERMINED SYSTEM RESOURCES OF A COMPUTER SYSTEM | June 2016 | March 2019 | Allow | 32 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15194106 | Multi-Version Regression Tester for Source Code | June 2016 | July 2018 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15192093 | AUTOMATICALLY UPDATING A SHARED PROJECT BUILD PLATFORM | June 2016 | September 2018 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15190593 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS THAT PERFORMS SET VALUE SYNCHRONIZATION PROCESS, CONTROL METHOD THEREFOR, STORAGE MEDIUM STORING CONTROL PROGRAM THEREFOR, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM | June 2016 | September 2019 | Allow | 38 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15171992 | HIERARCHICAL DIRECTIVES-BASED MANAGEMENT OF RUNTIME BEHAVIORS | June 2016 | November 2016 | Allow | 5 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15161233 | INTERFACE TRANSITIONING AND/OR TRANSFORMATION | May 2016 | October 2019 | Allow | 41 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15008860 | METHOD AND SYSTEM OF TESTING SOFTWARE USING REAL TIME REPLICATION | January 2016 | May 2018 | Allow | 27 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14989082 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MEASURING SYSTEM AVAILABILITY FOR SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT | January 2016 | May 2018 | Abandon | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14986434 | COOPERATIVE WEB-ASSISTED DEEP LINK REDIRECTION | December 2015 | September 2018 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14969578 | CODE CONSISTENCY CHECKING METHOD | December 2015 | November 2017 | Abandon | 23 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14782169 | Method for Type Checking and Transformation of a Computer Program with First-Class Static Functions | December 2015 | April 2018 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14970294 | AUTOMATIC PROGRAM SYNTHESIS USING MONADIC SECOND-ORDER LOGIC | December 2015 | May 2018 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14970007 | REARRANGEABLE CODE OPTIMIZATION MODULES | December 2015 | September 2018 | Allow | 33 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14757027 | CAPACITY AND AUTOMATED DE-INSTALL OF LINKET MOBILE APPS WITH DEEP LINKS | November 2015 | May 2017 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14732054 | DYNAMIC REPLACEMENT OF SOFTWARE COMPONENTS | June 2015 | July 2017 | Abandon | 26 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14686766 | User Interfaces of Application Porting Software Platform | April 2015 | May 2018 | Allow | 37 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 14676140 | CODE TRANSFORMATION USING EXTENSIBILITY LIBRARIES | April 2015 | February 2018 | Allow | 35 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 14428686 | MONITOR USABLE WITH CONTINUOUS DEPLOYMENT | March 2015 | February 2017 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14624878 | SOFTWARE PRODUCT RELEASE AUTOMATION FRAMEWORK | February 2015 | December 2017 | Allow | 34 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14623686 | Method and Apparatus for Application Management and Control | February 2015 | May 2018 | Abandon | 39 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 14623180 | GENERATING A SCHEDULE OF INSTRUCTIONS BASED ON A PROCESSOR MEMORY TREE | February 2015 | March 2018 | Abandon | 37 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 14568392 | ASSIGNING HOME MEMORY ADDRESSES TO FUNCTION CALL PARAMETERS | December 2014 | April 2017 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14536902 | ASSIGNING HOME MEMORY ADDRESSES TO FUNCTION CALL PARAMETERS | November 2014 | May 2017 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14532846 | AUTO MULTI-THREADING IN MACROSCALAR COMPILERS | November 2014 | September 2016 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14515798 | METHOD OF PRESENTING TRACE DATA WITH IMPROVED EFFICIENCY BY USING HOSTED FORMATTED OUTPUT COMMANDS | October 2014 | October 2017 | Abandon | 36 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 14510114 | DEFECT CLASSIFICATION AND ASSOCIATION IN A SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT | October 2014 | October 2016 | Abandon | 24 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14501190 | DUAL/MULTI-MODE PROCESSOR PIPELINE SAMPLING | September 2014 | October 2019 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14498258 | EVALUATION SYSTEM, EVALUATION DEVICE, AND EVALUATION METHOD | September 2014 | February 2016 | Abandon | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14495973 | AUTOMATED RESPONSE TO DETECTION OF THREAT TO CLOUD VIRTUAL MACHINE | September 2014 | February 2017 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14496117 | SUBSCRIBER DEFINED DYNAMIC EVENTING | September 2014 | February 2018 | Abandon | 41 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14494903 | INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD AND INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS | September 2014 | October 2017 | Allow | 37 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14495195 | METHOD FOR CONFIRMING CORRECTION PROGRAM AND INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS | September 2014 | September 2018 | Allow | 48 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14387685 | SYNCHRONIZING INSTALLATION AND EXECUTION OF A PROGRAM ON A SECOND INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS WITH A FIRST INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS WHICH FAILED INSTALLATION OF THE PROGRAM | September 2014 | April 2018 | Allow | 42 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 14387627 | SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY | September 2014 | April 2017 | Allow | 30 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14490922 | Loading Code in Self-Contained Applications | September 2014 | June 2017 | Abandon | 33 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 14475653 | MANAGING MIDDLEWARE USING AN APPLICATION MANAGER | September 2014 | April 2016 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14314199 | System And Method For Automatically Declaring Variables | June 2014 | January 2016 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14228202 | SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT APPARATUS AND METHOD | March 2014 | April 2017 | Abandon | 37 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 14227029 | HIERARCHICAL DIRECTIVES-BASED MANAGEMENT OF RUNTIME BEHAVIORS | March 2014 | March 2016 | Allow | 23 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14227688 | GENERATING A FUNCTIONAL PERFORMANCE INDEX ASSOCIATED WITH SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT | March 2014 | November 2015 | Abandon | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14222911 | Computing Program Equivalence Based on a Hierarchy of Program Semantics and Related Canonical Representations | March 2014 | March 2017 | Allow | 35 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14222812 | COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD, PROGRAM, AND TRACER NODE FOR OBTAINING TRACE DATA RELATING TO PARTICULAR VIRTUAL MACHINE | March 2014 | March 2016 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14222045 | DEVELOPMENT TOOLS FOR LOGGING AND ANALYZING SOFTWARE BUGS | March 2014 | October 2017 | Allow | 43 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 14222490 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CODE ANALYSIS USING SYMBOLIC TYPES | March 2014 | January 2016 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14222166 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TESTING COMPUTING DEVICES IN A HETEROGENEOUS ENVIRONMENT | March 2014 | December 2017 | Abandon | 45 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14221750 | MANAGING DYNAMIC CAPACITANCE USING CODE SCHEDULING | March 2014 | June 2018 | Allow | 50 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14208257 | DUAL/MULTI-MODE PROCESSOR PIPELINE SAMPLING | March 2014 | September 2018 | Allow | 54 | 6 | 0 | No | No |
| 14160521 | Automated Porting of Application to Mobile Infrastructures | January 2014 | March 2016 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13965535 | MODIFYING AN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ARCHITECTURE FRAMEWORK | August 2013 | July 2014 | Allow | 11 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 13964067 | RE-FACTOR CODE TO USE METHOD CHAINING WITH OPTIMIZER TOOL | August 2013 | May 2015 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13850207 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SEPARATE COMPILATION OF DEVICE CODE EMBEDDED IN HOST CODE | March 2013 | March 2016 | Allow | 35 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 13850238 | OPTIMIZING INTERMEDIATE REPRESENTATION OF SCRIPT CODE FOR ATOMIC EXECUTION | March 2013 | December 2015 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13849122 | PSEUDO PROGRAM USE DURING PROGRAM INSTALLATION | March 2013 | October 2016 | Allow | 43 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13844374 | SYSTEM, METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR CREATING A COMPUTE CONSTRUCT | March 2013 | February 2016 | Abandon | 35 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13842519 | CODE SEPARATION WITH SEMANTIC GUARANTEES | March 2013 | February 2016 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13833300 | Software Product Capable of Using Zero and Third Party Applications | March 2013 | April 2017 | Abandon | 49 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner MACASIANO, JOANNE GONZALES.
With a 25.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is below the USPTO average, indicating that appeals face more challenges here than typical.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 47.1% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner MACASIANO, JOANNE GONZALES works in Art Unit 2197 and has examined 148 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 69.6%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 42 months.
Examiner MACASIANO, JOANNE GONZALES's allowance rate of 69.6% places them in the 32% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by MACASIANO, JOANNE GONZALES receive 3.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 86% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by MACASIANO, JOANNE GONZALES is 42 months. This places the examiner in the 18% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +34.1% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by MACASIANO, JOANNE GONZALES. This interview benefit is in the 82% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 22.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 27% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 26.7% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 37% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 50.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 43% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 71.4% of appeals filed. This is in the 58% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 40.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 106.7% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 94% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 1.4% of allowed cases (in the 70% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments more often than average to place applications in condition for allowance (MPEP § 1302.04).
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 16% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.