Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18882056 | AUTOMATING SOFTWARE APPLICATION INFRASTRUCTURE DEPLOYMENT IN A CLOUD COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT | September 2024 | March 2025 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18651009 | Custom Patching Automation with Machine Learning Integration | April 2024 | March 2025 | Allow | 10 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18611587 | SYSTEM FOR MODULATING AN NAVIGATION GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE DURING MOVEMENT OF A VEHICLE | March 2024 | April 2025 | Abandon | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18443743 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR APP DISCOVERY, INSTALLATION, AND USAGE | February 2024 | September 2024 | Allow | 7 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18444188 | System and Method for Phased Software Update Deployment | February 2024 | January 2025 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18391377 | CREDENTIAL-CHANGING PLUGIN FOR IOT DEVICES | December 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18535229 | SYSTEM APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR ENERGY MANAGEMENT, FOR USAGE BY CONSUMERS OF ENERGY FROM ELECTRIC UTILITY SERVICE PROVIDERS, AND MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT OF SAME | December 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18515228 | METHOD OF PERFORMING FULL FIRMWARE UPDATE PROCEDURE ON EMBEDDED ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND RELATED EMBEDDED ELECTRONIC DEVICE | November 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18493100 | IDENTIFYING SOFTWARE INTERDEPENDENCIES USING LINE-OF-CODE BEHAVIOR AND RELATION MODELS | October 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 17 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18468768 | System and method for dynamic switching between an old version and a new version of a software code | September 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18235463 | ACCELERATED APPLICATION START USING ESTIMATED PLAY DURATION | August 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18446845 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TESTING A SOFTWARE APPLICATION | August 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18446227 | HOTPATCH METHOD FOR VULNERABILITIES IN EMBEDDED IOT DEVICES | August 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18361071 | System and method for upgrading non-permitted operating systems on standalone computing systems | July 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18356758 | UPGRADE INFRASTRUCTURE WITH INTEGRATION POINTS | July 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18353047 | SYSTEMS, METHODS AND DEVICES FOR DEVICE FINGERPRINTING AND AUTOMATIC DEPLOYMENT OF SOFTWARE IN A COMPUTING NETWORK USING A PEER-TO-PEER APPROACH | July 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18342390 | METHOD, SYSTEM, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR MANAGING MULTIPLE CLOUDS | June 2023 | June 2025 | Abandon | 23 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18010189 | Method and Device for Installing Program | June 2023 | August 2025 | Abandon | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18210301 | Method for updating encrypted firmware | June 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18209538 | PRE-UPGRADE CHECK BASED UPGRADE OF APPLICATIONS | June 2023 | June 2025 | Abandon | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18130322 | CONFIGURING NODES FOR DISTRIBUTED COMPUTE TASKS | April 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18027007 | METHOD FOR UPDATING SOFTWARE BY CONFIRMING HARDWARE VERSION INFORMATION | March 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18114708 | Identifying Execution Environments for Deploying Network Functions | February 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 20 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18172854 | STATIC ANALYSIS FOR CLOUD INTEGRATION FLOWS USING MACHINE LEARNING | February 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18167406 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VARIANT TESTING AT SCALE | February 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18106766 | METHOD FOR PATCHING CODE LOCATED IN ONE TIME PROGRAMMABLE MEMORY | February 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18100941 | Data Center Environment Architecture Including a Continuous Scheduler for Generating a Continuous Execution Plan When Performing Test Automation Orchestration | January 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18099703 | Smart Microservice Testing Based on Centrality Prioritization | January 2023 | December 2024 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18156550 | FIELD UPGRADE OF MULTIPLE FIRMWARE INSTANCES | January 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18098402 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DEVELOPING NEURAL NETWORK APPLICATIONS | January 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18064198 | Automate Load Test Scenario Based On Mapping With Real-Time Data Monitoring | December 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17994536 | AUTOMATIC DETECTION OF ROBOTIC PROCESS AUTOMATION TRIGGER EVENTS | November 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17945158 | PREDICTING AND MINIMIZING QUANTUM DECOHERENCE IN QUANTUM COMPUTER SYSTEMS | September 2022 | July 2024 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17901949 | VEHICLE DATA COMMUNICATION DEVICE, CENTER DEVICE, DATA COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE NON-TRANSITORY TANGIBLE STORAGE MEDIUM | September 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17798880 | PROGRAM GENERATION APPARATUS, PROGRAM GENERATION METHOD AND PROGRAM | August 2022 | March 2025 | Abandon | 31 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17880865 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRANSFORMING .NET FRAMEWORK BASED APPLICATIONS TO MODERN FRAMEWORKS | August 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17876192 | HYBRID CLOUD PACKAGE BUILD ARCHITECTURE | July 2022 | August 2024 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17871508 | INTENT-BASED CHAOS LEVEL CREATION TO VARIABLY TEST ENVIRONMENTS | July 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17758360 | LOCATION DETERMINING METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IMPLEMENTING | July 2022 | November 2024 | Abandon | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17857461 | THREAT MITIGATION SYSTEM AND METHOD | July 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 31 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17808393 | COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, SERVER, AND CONTROL METHOD | June 2022 | May 2025 | Abandon | 35 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17664154 | DYNAMIC PLUGIN MANAGEMENT FOR SYSTEM HEALTH | May 2022 | January 2025 | Abandon | 32 | 3 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17746151 | OTA DIFFERENTIAL UPGRADE METHOD AND SYSTEM OF MASTER-SLAVE ARCHITECTURE | May 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17736760 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DECLARATIVE DESIGN AND EXECUTION OF INTENT-BASED SERVICES | May 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17725116 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR RECOMMENDING RUNBOOKS FOR DETECTED EVENTS | April 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17702647 | CHANGING PROGRAM BEHAVIOR AT RUNTIME | March 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17689171 | OTA MASTER, UPDATE CONTROL METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY STORAGE MEDIUM | March 2022 | May 2025 | Abandon | 38 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17671941 | COMMUNICATION DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD | February 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17579099 | METHOD, APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM FOR SENSOR-BASED APPLICATION DEPLOYMENT | January 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17578820 | TECHNOLOGIES FOR OVER-THE-AIR UPDATES FOR TELEMATICS SYSTEMS | January 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17561327 | AUTOMATIC MODIFICATION OF REPOSITORY FILES | December 2021 | July 2024 | Abandon | 31 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17453721 | MAINTAINING COMPUTING ENVIRONMENTS USING OPERATOR WITH DYNAMICALLY UPDATABLE STATE | November 2021 | October 2024 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17484455 | MECHANISM FOR SECURE AND RESILIENT CONFIGURATION UPGRADES | September 2021 | July 2025 | Allow | 46 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17229497 | COMPILER FOR IMPLEMENTING NEURAL NETWORK ACCELERATOR | April 2021 | October 2024 | Allow | 42 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17133462 | FIRMWARE UPDATE TECHNOLOGIES | December 2020 | July 2024 | Allow | 43 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16896281 | ELECTRONIC APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD | June 2020 | December 2024 | Allow | 54 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16846693 | Subtask Assignment for an Artificial Intelligence Task | April 2020 | September 2024 | Allow | 53 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15785940 | LATE-STAGE SOFTWARE FEATURE REDUCTION TOOL FOR SECURITY AND PERFORMANCE | October 2017 | July 2018 | Allow | 9 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15662928 | DEBUGGING FOR SQL STATEMENT | July 2017 | July 2018 | Allow | 12 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15444711 | FIRMWARE DEBUG TRACE CAPTURE | February 2017 | July 2018 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15440509 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TESTING A SOFTWARE APPLICATION | February 2017 | September 2018 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15441115 | SYSTEM, METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR CONVERTING A CURRENT JAVA PROJECT TO A MAVEN PROJECT | February 2017 | August 2018 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15398579 | TESTING SOFTWARE CODE IN A PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENT | January 2017 | December 2017 | Allow | 11 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15398176 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING CODE FROM EXECUTABLE MODELS WITH FLOATING POINT DATA | January 2017 | July 2018 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15371812 | APPLICATION TESTING ON A BLOCKCHAIN | December 2016 | November 2017 | Allow | 11 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15261327 | VERIFICATION OF COMPLEX SOFTWARE CODE USING A MODULARIZED ARCHITECTURE | September 2016 | January 2018 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15260247 | AUTOMATED QUALITY ASSURANCE TESTING OF BROWSER-BASED APPLICATIONS | September 2016 | November 2017 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15254074 | BRANCH TRACE COMPRESSION | September 2016 | August 2018 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15230077 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ANOMALY DETECTION | August 2016 | April 2018 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15222460 | SYSTEM, METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PREVENTING VULNERABLE INTERLEAVINGS IN WEB APPLICATIONS AT COMPILE TIME | July 2016 | May 2018 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15218562 | SPECIFYING USER DEFINED OR TRANSLATOR DEFINITIONS TO USE TO INTERPRET MNEMONICS IN A COMPUTER PROGRAM | July 2016 | July 2018 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15209551 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TESTING A SOFTWARE APPLICATION | July 2016 | November 2016 | Allow | 4 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15189761 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING FUNCTIONAL TEST CASES FOR SOFTWARE SYSTEMS | June 2016 | September 2018 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15130837 | BIOSEQUENCE-BASED APPROACH TO ANALYZING BINARIES | April 2016 | September 2018 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15090596 | Automatic Code Transformation | April 2016 | February 2017 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15079662 | INTELLIGENT AUTOMATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE TEST SCRIPTS AND CODE REQUIREMENTS | March 2016 | January 2017 | Allow | 10 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14962374 | DEPLOYMENT OF DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTS | December 2015 | June 2018 | Allow | 31 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14961328 | MULTI-DATA ANALYSIS BASED PROACTIVE DEFECT DETECTION AND RESOLUTION | December 2015 | June 2017 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14957233 | SYSTEM FOR MANAGING SOFTWARE PACKAGE CONFIGURATION | December 2015 | October 2017 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14949137 | Linking Customized External Widgets to Dashboard Data | November 2015 | June 2017 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14930375 | Similarity Scoring Of Programs | November 2015 | January 2018 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14884467 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING REAL-TIME RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH APPLICATION LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT PLATFORMS | October 2015 | May 2018 | Abandon | 31 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 14882033 | CUSTOMIZABLE SERVICE DELIVERY SYSTEM WITH SCALABLE WORKFLOW | October 2015 | December 2016 | Allow | 14 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14882026 | MONITORING SYSTEM FOR MULTIPLE UTILITIES | October 2015 | March 2018 | Abandon | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14880268 | SYSTEM, APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR ENERGY MANAGEMENT, FOR USAGE BY CONSUMERS OF ENERGY FROM ELECTRIC UTILITY SERVICE PROVIDERS, AND MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT OF SAME | October 2015 | April 2018 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14877469 | COMPOSITE MANUFACTURING WITH A MULTI-DIMENSIONAL ARRAY OF INDEPENDENTLY-CONTROLLABLE THERMAL ZONES | October 2015 | April 2018 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14875470 | WATER HEATER DEMAND SIDE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | October 2015 | August 2018 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14804586 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TESTING A SOFTWARE APPLICATION | July 2015 | March 2016 | Allow | 8 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 14739469 | CENTRALIZED SYSTEM FOR SOFTWARE UPDATING VEHICLE COMPONENTS | June 2015 | September 2017 | Allow | 27 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 14440742 | PLANT ENGINEERING SYSTEM | May 2015 | December 2017 | Abandon | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14697800 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR TESTING CONTROL SOFTWARE OF A CONTROLLED SYSTEM | April 2015 | November 2016 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14682655 | IMPLEMENTATION-EMBEDDED AND RUNTIME-RELEVANT BUSINESS PROCESS MODELING | April 2015 | May 2018 | Abandon | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14657602 | LIGHT APP OFFLINE UPDATING METHOD, DEVICE AND TERMINAL | March 2015 | April 2017 | Allow | 25 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14632325 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR HARDENING OF CFG FLATTENING | February 2015 | December 2016 | Abandon | 21 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14613066 | SYSTEM AND METHOD TO QUANTIFY DIGITAL DATA SHARING IN A MULTI-THREADED EXECUTION | February 2015 | August 2016 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14604973 | VARIABLE INFERENCE SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SOFTWARE PROGRAM | January 2015 | April 2017 | Allow | 27 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14595901 | BINARY PROGRAM INSTRUMENTATION AND DEBUGGING | January 2015 | July 2017 | Abandon | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14592248 | MEDIA PROCESSING DEVICE, CHECK PROCESSING DEVICE, AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING A MEDIA PROCESSING DEVICE | January 2015 | September 2018 | Abandon | 45 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 14583616 | TRUSTED BINARY TRANSLATION | December 2014 | June 2017 | Allow | 30 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14547752 | PRESSURE CONTROL METHOD FOR PROCESS CHAMBER AND PRESSURE CONTROL DEVICE FOR PROCESS CHAMBER | November 2014 | December 2017 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner BODDEN, EVRAL E.
With a 25.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is below the USPTO average, indicating that appeals face more challenges here than typical.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 33.3% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner BODDEN, EVRAL E works in Art Unit 2197 and has examined 213 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 51.2%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 50 months.
Examiner BODDEN, EVRAL E's allowance rate of 51.2% places them in the 13% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by BODDEN, EVRAL E receive 3.35 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 92% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by BODDEN, EVRAL E is 50 months. This places the examiner in the 5% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +31.4% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by BODDEN, EVRAL E. This interview benefit is in the 79% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 12.6% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 8% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 14.9% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 16% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 80.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 62% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 55.6% of appeals filed. This is in the 27% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 53.3% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 42.9% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 35% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 13% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 16% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.