Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19204472 | CENTRALIZED PARAMETER MANAGEMENT FOR AUTOMATIC EXECUTION OF PARAMETERIZED INSTRUCTIONS | May 2025 | September 2025 | Allow | 5 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17727121 | RULE ENGINE FOR REAL TIME RESTRUCTURING OF ENTERPRISE APPLICATION | April 2022 | March 2026 | Allow | 47 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17727064 | UI FRAMEWORK FOR REAL TIME RESTRUCTURING OF ENTERPRISE APPLICATION | April 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 45 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17726974 | DYNAMIC MODULE INJECTOR FOR REAL TIME RESTRUCTURING OF ENTERPRISE APPLICATION | April 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 44 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17720709 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO EFFICIENTLY INTEGRATE PROCESSING SERVICE REQUESTS INTO A WEBPAGE | April 2022 | December 2024 | Abandon | 32 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17685001 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RUNNING APPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH BROWSER-BASED USER INTERFACES WITHIN MULTI-DEVELOPER COMPUTING PLATFORMS | March 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17456258 | SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND DEVICES FOR IMPLEMENTING A CENTRAL COMPUTING PLATFORM FOR DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING ENVIRONMENTS | November 2021 | January 2025 | Abandon | 38 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17519419 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO EFFICIENTLY INTEGRATE PROCESSING SERVICE REQUESTS INTO A WEBPAGE | November 2021 | January 2024 | Abandon | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17496957 | Computing Expression Medium, Development Environment, and Device Communication and Control Architecture | October 2021 | June 2025 | Allow | 44 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17493783 | HANDLING SYSTEM CALLS DURING EXECUTION OF AN APPLICATION OVER A PLURALITY OF NODES | October 2021 | April 2025 | Abandon | 43 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17467931 | OPEN SERVICE BROKER COMPLIANT SERVICE BROKER USING SERVERLESS FUNCTIONS | September 2021 | October 2025 | Allow | 49 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17412595 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR REDUCED POWER CONSUMPTION | August 2021 | January 2026 | Allow | 53 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17405217 | MECHANISM TO PROVIDE RELIABLE RECEIPT OF EVENT MESSAGES | August 2021 | December 2025 | Allow | 52 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17389691 | Connected Reference Architecture and Toolkit | July 2021 | October 2025 | Allow | 51 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17387726 | EXPOSING A CLOUD API BASED ON SUPPORTED HARDWARE | July 2021 | March 2025 | Allow | 44 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17381232 | HYBRID COMPUTING SYSTEM MANAGEMENT | July 2021 | April 2025 | Allow | 45 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17422685 | METHODS FOR EVENT PRIORITIZATION IN NETWORK FUNCTION VIRTUALIZATION USING RULE-BASED FEEDBACK | July 2021 | December 2025 | Allow | 53 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17370384 | MESSAGE ORIENTED MIDDLEWARE CLUSTER SYNCHRONIZATION | July 2021 | October 2024 | Allow | 40 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17359665 | METHODS, DEVICES AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIA FOR PROCESSING A HOSTED APPLICATION | June 2021 | April 2023 | Abandon | 22 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17304820 | LOW LATENCY REMOTING TO ACCELERATORS | June 2021 | August 2022 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17342531 | SHARED MESSAGE MANAGEMENT | June 2021 | March 2023 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17340392 | DATA RENDERING FOR APPLICATIONS | June 2021 | November 2023 | Allow | 29 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17336901 | API OPTIMIZER USING CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS OF INTERFACE DATA EXCHANGE | June 2021 | April 2025 | Allow | 46 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17332543 | CLASSICAL MANAGEMENT OF QUBIT REQUESTS | May 2021 | February 2023 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17318500 | SYSTEM TO FACILITATE TRANSITION TO MICROSERVICES | May 2021 | December 2023 | Allow | 31 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17245505 | DELAY CAUSE IDENTIFICATION METHOD, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM, DELAY CAUSE IDENTIFICATION APPARATUS | April 2021 | December 2022 | Abandon | 20 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17179383 | API CONFIGURATION USING AUTO-RATIONALIZATION AND MODELING | February 2021 | December 2023 | Allow | 34 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17172407 | REDUCING START LATENCY OF SERVERLESS MICROSERVICES | February 2021 | March 2026 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17145971 | APPLICATION CODE MANAGEMENT USING AN EVENT STREAM | January 2021 | August 2024 | Allow | 43 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17133559 | ALGORITHMS FOR OPTIMIZING SMALL MESSAGE COLLECTIVES WITH HARDWARE SUPPORTED TRIGGERED OPERATIONS | December 2020 | February 2025 | Allow | 50 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17130177 | INTER-NODE MESSAGING CONTROLLER | December 2020 | October 2025 | Abandon | 58 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17091458 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INTEGRATING MOBILE APPLICATION PLUG-INS | November 2020 | February 2025 | Allow | 51 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17039889 | CUSTOMIZED CONFIGURATION OF MULTIMODAL INTERACTIONS FOR DIALOG-DRIVEN APPLICATIONS | September 2020 | November 2023 | Allow | 37 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17037340 | AUTOMATIC MULTISTEP EXECUTION | September 2020 | July 2022 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17022673 | INDUSTRIAL NETWORK EMULATION | September 2020 | March 2023 | Abandon | 30 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17004508 | ASYNCHRONOUS DOCUMENT INGESTION AND ENRICHMENT SYSTEM | August 2020 | April 2024 | Allow | 43 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16999706 | SELF OPTIMIZING APPLICATION | August 2020 | March 2023 | Allow | 31 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16987555 | EVENT DRIVING METHOD AND APPARATUS | August 2020 | May 2022 | Abandon | 21 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16986805 | INTELLIGENT SCALING IN MICROSERVICE-BASED DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS | August 2020 | January 2022 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16937011 | DEPLOYING MULTIPLE DIFFERENT APPLICATIONS INTO A SINGLE SHORT-LIVED CONTAINER ALONG WITH A MASTER RUNTIME | July 2020 | August 2022 | Allow | 25 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16937231 | ARCHITECTURE FOR LARGE PAYLOAD HANDLING IN EVENT PIPELINE | July 2020 | April 2022 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16931663 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RUNNING APPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH BROWSER-BASED USER INTERFACES WITHIN MULTI-DEVELOPER COMPUTING PLATFORMS | July 2020 | August 2021 | Allow | 13 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16932395 | OPTIMIZATION OF PYROLYSIS TUBE CRACKING EFFICIENCY | July 2020 | June 2022 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16929981 | Site Specific Notifications | July 2020 | April 2022 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16911512 | PREDICTING WEB APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACE CALL OPERATIONS USING MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES | June 2020 | July 2024 | Allow | 48 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16882220 | METHOD FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM | May 2020 | May 2023 | Abandon | 36 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16881302 | STREAMING DATA PIPELINE WITH BATCH PERFORMANCE | May 2020 | February 2023 | Allow | 33 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16880277 | ISOLATING COMMUNICATION STREAMS TO ACHIEVE HIGH PERFORMANCE MULTI-THREADED COMMUNICATION FOR GLOBAL ADDRESS SPACE PROGRAMS | May 2020 | July 2023 | Allow | 38 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15931852 | Automated Deployment of Analytic Models | May 2020 | December 2021 | Abandon | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15931740 | SEQUENTIAL PROCESSING OF CHANGES IN A DISTRIBUTED SYSTEM | May 2020 | August 2021 | Allow | 16 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16834872 | MULTITHREADED LOSSY QUEUE PROTOCOL | March 2020 | August 2022 | Allow | 29 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16646658 | VISUALIZATION INFRASTRUCTURE FOR WEB APPLICATIONS | March 2020 | April 2022 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 16808215 | AUTOMATED API CODE GENERATION | March 2020 | November 2021 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16802197 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CAPTURING AND REPORTING A TECHNICAL EVENT | February 2020 | November 2021 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16801418 | DATA RENDERING FOR APPLICATIONS | February 2020 | March 2021 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16777496 | COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE FOR EMULATING AN INTEGRATOR IN A CORRELITHM OBJECT PROCESSING SYSTEM | January 2020 | March 2021 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16774173 | Computing Expression Medium, Development Environment, and Device Communication and Control Architecture | January 2020 | July 2021 | Allow | 17 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16623686 | STREAMING RESOURCE MANAGEMENT | December 2019 | December 2022 | Abandon | 36 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16684512 | SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND DEVICES FOR IMPLEMENTING A CENTRAL COMPUTING PLATFORM FOR DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING ENVIRONMENTS | November 2019 | August 2021 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16674035 | REAL TIME RESTRUCTURING OF ENTERPRISE OR SUPPLY CHAIN APPLICATION | November 2019 | March 2022 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16671672 | POOLED VALIDATOR NODE CONFIGURATION FOR HOSTED BLOCKCHAIN NETWORK | November 2019 | August 2023 | Allow | 46 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16664130 | UTILIZING A NEURAL NETWORK MODEL TO DETERMINE RISK ASSOCIATED WITH AN APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACE OF A WEB APPLICATION | October 2019 | March 2021 | Allow | 17 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16578480 | ROUTER MANAGEMENT BY AN EVENT STREAM PROCESSING CLUSTER MANAGER | September 2019 | April 2020 | Allow | 7 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16568038 | DISTRIBUTED SCHEDULER PROVIDING EXECUTION PIPE BALANCE | September 2019 | June 2024 | Allow | 57 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16563556 | INTER-PROCESS COMMUNICATION FOR MICROKERNEL OPERATING SYSTEM | September 2019 | December 2021 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16491947 | CARD DEVICE HAVING APPLETS AND TRANSFER OF APDUS TO APPLETS | September 2019 | November 2022 | Allow | 38 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16486351 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR LAZY LOADING OF JS SCRIPTS | August 2019 | October 2022 | Abandon | 38 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16481940 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SIMULATING A ROBOTIC PROGRAM OF AN INDUSTRIAL ROBOT | July 2019 | June 2024 | Allow | 59 | 4 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 16523554 | Distributable and Customizable Load-Balancing of Data-Associated Computation Via Partitions and Virtual Processes | July 2019 | August 2022 | Allow | 37 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16452086 | One Click Active Directory Infrastructure | June 2019 | March 2022 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16436164 | SCALABLE EVENT-DRIVEN SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE FOR THE AUTOMATION OF PEOPLE-CENTRIC SYSTEMS | June 2019 | February 2024 | Allow | 56 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 16462639 | SYSTEM FOR INTER-PROCESS COMMUNICATION | May 2019 | October 2021 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16405680 | COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE FOR EMULATING A CONTROL NODE IN CONJUNCTION WITH STIMULUS CONDITIONS IN A CORRELITHM OBJECT PROCESSING SYSTEM | May 2019 | April 2021 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16281663 | USING RESPONSE TIME OBJECTIVES IN A STORAGE SYSTEM | February 2019 | June 2021 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16261263 | Initiating Background Updates Based on User Activity | January 2019 | December 2020 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16243743 | ROBOTIC PROCESS AUTOMATION FOR SIGNIFICANT SEQUENCES OF DESKTOP EVENTS | January 2019 | October 2022 | Allow | 45 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16208388 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR EVENT CONSUMER MANAGEMENT IN AN AGGREGATED EVENT PLATFORM | December 2018 | March 2022 | Allow | 39 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16204483 | Commands For Simulation Systems And Methods | November 2018 | May 2022 | Allow | 41 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16303499 | Processing System for Data Distribution and Program Thereof | November 2018 | February 2022 | Allow | 39 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16195473 | EVENT PUBLISHING SYSTEM FOR HETEROGENEOUS EVENTS | November 2018 | December 2020 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16177187 | AUTOMATED CONSOLIDATION OF API SPECIFICATIONS | October 2018 | March 2021 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16174890 | Non-Determinism Testing For Software For Controlling Autonomous Vehicles | October 2018 | April 2025 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16163748 | ROUTER MANAGEMENT BY AN EVENT STREAM PROCESSING CLUSTER MANAGER | October 2018 | May 2019 | Allow | 7 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16130553 | SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR LOGGING AND SEARCHING HISTORY EVENTS SUCH AS AIRLINE FLIGHT OR CREW HISTORY | September 2018 | April 2019 | Allow | 7 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16109847 | UTILIZING REUSABLE AJAX REQUESTS | August 2018 | January 2021 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16031826 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR THROTTLING TRANSACTION PROCESSING BASED ON CONSTRAINED SUB-SYSTEMS | July 2018 | November 2019 | Allow | 16 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15843126 | BOOTSTRAPPING A CONVERSATION SERVICE USING DOCUMENTATION OF A REST API | December 2017 | January 2020 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15843973 | AUTOMATIC MULTISTEP EXECUTION | December 2017 | June 2020 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15842616 | REQUEST SIMULATION FOR ENSURING COMPLIANCE | December 2017 | June 2020 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15834071 | TRACKING DRIVER LOAD AND UNLOAD ON WINDOWS OS | December 2017 | August 2020 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15827839 | MESSAGES WITH DELAYED DELIVERY IN AN IN-DATABASE SHARDED QUEUE | November 2017 | February 2020 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15815293 | EVENT STREAM PROCESSING CLUSTER MANAGER | November 2017 | July 2018 | Allow | 8 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15815043 | GPU NETWORKING USING AN INTEGRATED COMMAND PROCESSOR | November 2017 | August 2022 | Allow | 57 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15797960 | DYNAMIC RULE-BASED TRANSFORMATION OF API CALLS | October 2017 | April 2020 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15794299 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND DATA TRANSFER METHOD THEREOF | October 2017 | December 2021 | Abandon | 50 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 15794440 | BALANCED MESSAGE DISTRIBUTION IN DISTRIBUTED MESSAGE HANDLING SYSTEMS | October 2017 | October 2021 | Abandon | 48 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15566653 | DYNAMIC MESSAGING FOR AN APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACE | October 2017 | April 2020 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15729952 | MICROSERVICE-BASED DATA PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD, AND PROGRAM | October 2017 | March 2020 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15727540 | APPLICATION PROGRAM INTERFACE MASHUP GENERATION | October 2017 | May 2019 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15694912 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DYNAMIC TRANSPARENT CONSISTENT APPLICATION-REPLICATION OF MULTI-PROCESS MULTI-THREADED APPLICATIONS | September 2017 | November 2018 | Allow | 15 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner JORDAN, KIMBERLY L.
With a 20.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is below the USPTO average, indicating that appeals face more challenges here than typical.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 34.4% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner JORDAN, KIMBERLY L works in Art Unit 2194 and has examined 425 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 68.7%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 47 months.
Examiner JORDAN, KIMBERLY L's allowance rate of 68.7% places them in the 30% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by JORDAN, KIMBERLY L receive 3.08 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 88% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by JORDAN, KIMBERLY L is 47 months. This places the examiner in the 9% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +35.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by JORDAN, KIMBERLY L. This interview benefit is in the 83% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 20.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 23% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 32.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 47% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 44.4% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 40% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 59.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 33% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 41.7% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 63.4% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 68% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 6.1% of allowed cases (in the 88% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.7% of allowed cases (in the 57% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.