Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18634653 | GLOBAL REAL TIME ON DEMAND RENDERING | April 2024 | July 2025 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18424350 | AUDIO TIME SYNCHRONIZATION USING PRIORITIZED SCHEDULE | January 2024 | December 2024 | Allow | 43 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18397880 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION IN DOCUMENT, AND DEVICE AND MEDIUM | December 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18523862 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TABULAR DATA PROCESSING, TERMINAL, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | November 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 20 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 18518048 | METHODS, SYSTEM, APPARATUSES AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR INFORMATION REFERENCING | November 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 26 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 18369254 | MEMORY-TRACKING RESOURCE MANAGER FOR ELASTIC DISTRIBUTED GRAPH-PROCESSING SYSTEM | September 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 29 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18466894 | METHOD FOR PERFORMING DRAWING OPERATION BY APPLICATION AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | September 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 30 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18274447 | PROGRAM, FILE GENERATION METHOD, INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM | July 2023 | April 2025 | Abandon | 21 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 18344345 | INSTRUCTION MERGING AND INDUCTION VARIABLE REPLACEMENT | June 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18324085 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COMPLETING A FIELD IN A FORM-BASED APPLICATION | May 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 26 | 4 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 18299463 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCED DOCUMENT GENERATION | April 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 33 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18190527 | AUTOMATIC FILLING OF A FORM WITH FORMATTED TEXT | March 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 31 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18176220 | MEASUREMENTS OF VIRTUAL MACHINES | February 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 32 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18103924 | CAPTURING AND PROCESSING INTERACTIONS WITH A USER INTERFACE OF A NATIVE APPLICATION | January 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18102037 | ANNOTATION AND RETRIEVAL OF PERSONAL BOOKMARKS | January 2023 | October 2025 | Abandon | 32 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18067444 | BONDING MULTIPLE PERIPHERAL PORTS TO A SINGLE VIRTUAL MACHINE | December 2022 | August 2025 | Allow | 32 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17998721 | FLOW MANAGEMENT WITH SERVICES | November 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17968587 | CROSS CHANNEL DIGITAL DATA STRUCTURES INTEGRATION AND CONTROLS | October 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 27 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17958697 | PROGRAMMABLE CORE INTEGRATED WITH HARDWARE PIPELINE OF NETWORK INTERFACE DEVICE | October 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 29 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17956585 | ON-PREMISES NETWORK INTERFACE ADAPTED FOR CLOUD-BASED SERVICES | September 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 34 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17439360 | AUDIO PLAYING METHOD, APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM | September 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 50 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17951620 | MAINTENANCE BACKGROUND TASK REGULATION USING FEEDBACK FROM INSTRUMENTED WAITING POINTS | September 2022 | August 2025 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17887036 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PERSISTENT INHERITANCE OF ARBITRARY DOCUMENT CONTENT | August 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 38 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17883867 | ACCESS PROCESSING METHOD, DEVICE, STORAGE MEDIUM AND PROGRAM PRODUCT | August 2022 | December 2025 | Abandon | 40 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17817699 | GENERATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR VISUAL PRODUCT DETAILS | August 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 30 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17880903 | CROSS CHANNEL DIGITAL DATA ARCHIVING AND UTILIZATION SYSTEM | August 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 30 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17863097 | IN-FLIGHT INTEGRATED MODULAR AVIONICS (IMA) RECONFIGURATION | July 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17860986 | LEGISLATIVE CODE VERSIONING SYSTEM | July 2022 | February 2026 | Allow | 43 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17858382 | MATERIAL PRESENTATION METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | July 2022 | November 2025 | Abandon | 40 | 6 | 0 | No | No |
| 17839380 | DYNAMIC ITERATION OF GROUPED COMPONENTS IN A TEMPLATE | June 2022 | June 2025 | Abandon | 36 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17752102 | POD DEPLOYMENT METHOD AND APPARATUS | May 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17752652 | TECHNIQUES FOR AUTOMATIC FILLING OF AN INPUT FORM TO GENERATE A LISTING | May 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 35 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17660880 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR AUTOMATICALLY VALIDATING FILLED-OUT APPLICATION FORMS AGAINST ONE OR MORE VERIFICATION DOCUMENTS | April 2022 | February 2025 | Abandon | 33 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17704020 | ANALYTICS PORTAL FOR AIR-GAPPED HYPERCONVERGED INFRASTRUCTURE IN A HYBRID CLOUD ENVIRONMENT | March 2022 | June 2025 | Abandon | 39 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 17656167 | AUTOMATIC UPDATE MANAGEMENT IN A COMPUTING INFRASTRUCTURE | March 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17654425 | RESOURCE UTILIZATION EFFICIENCY BASED JOB SCHEDULING | March 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17689625 | AUTOMATIC DATA PIPELINE GENERATION | March 2022 | March 2025 | Abandon | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17640257 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR WRITING ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT BY INTERACTIVE TYPE AND DOCUMENT TYPE, METHOD FOR PROVIDING INTERACTIVE TYPE ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT | March 2022 | May 2025 | Abandon | 39 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17684419 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD | March 2022 | December 2024 | Abandon | 33 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17675691 | COMPUTER IMPLEMENTED COGNITIVE FUNCTIONING SYSTEM | February 2022 | November 2023 | Abandon | 21 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17674734 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING A SMART HELP EXTENSION FOR USE WITH AN ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENT | February 2022 | March 2026 | Allow | 49 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17672690 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD | February 2022 | November 2024 | Abandon | 33 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17575387 | CONSENSUS-BASED DISTRIBUTED SCHEDULER | January 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 42 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17624731 | METHOD FOR PROVIDING ELECTRIC DOCUMENT USING CHATBOT, APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR WRITING ELECTRIC DOCUMENT USING CHATBOT | January 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 34 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17567397 | MULTICHANNEL SYSTEM | January 2022 | January 2025 | Abandon | 36 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 17559465 | MONITORING CONTAINER-IMPLEMENTED SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS | December 2021 | August 2025 | Allow | 44 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17556453 | UNIFORM ADDRESSING IN BUSINESS PROCESS ENGINE | December 2021 | July 2025 | Allow | 43 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17457802 | ALIGNED PURPOSE DISASSOCIATION PROTOCOL FOR MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS | December 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17227919 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING AN APPLICATION PREDICTION ENGINE | April 2021 | April 2025 | Allow | 48 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17208780 | USER INTERFACES FOR DOWNLOADING APPLICATIONS ON AN ELECTRONIC DEVICE | March 2021 | January 2025 | Allow | 45 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17121499 | DEPTH-FIRST DEEP CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORK INFERENCE | December 2020 | August 2025 | Allow | 56 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17065299 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCED COURT DOCUMENT NAVIGATION | October 2020 | April 2025 | Abandon | 54 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17031707 | OBJECT-CENTRIC DATA ANALYSIS SYSTEM AND ASSOCIATED GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES | September 2020 | April 2025 | Allow | 55 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16994430 | CONTEXT SPECIFIC DOCUMENT RECOMMENDATION SYSTEM FOR AUTOMOTIVE RETAIL | August 2020 | December 2024 | Abandon | 52 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15795426 | MANAGING WHITE SPACE IN A PORTAL WEB PAGE | October 2017 | June 2019 | Allow | 20 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 15506661 | MOBILE TERMINAL CAPABLE OF EFFECTIVELY MANAGING CONTENTS BY SELECTING THOSE CONTENTS IN DIFFERENT MANNER AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF | February 2017 | July 2019 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15069464 | IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS INCLUDING A PREVIEW DISPLAY UNIT AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM STORING IMAGE FORMING PROGRAM | March 2016 | August 2017 | Allow | 17 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14987418 | HIGH-PERFORMANCE EDITING OF LARGE REMOTE FILES IN CLIENT-SERVER ARCHITECTURE | January 2016 | June 2017 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14598367 | TABLE COLUMN SPANNING | January 2015 | December 2016 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14530411 | CUSTOMIZED CONTENT FOR SOCIAL BROWSING FLOW | October 2014 | August 2019 | Allow | 58 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14079031 | MOBILIZING A WEB APPLICATION TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF A NATIVE DEVICE CAPABILITY | November 2013 | September 2016 | Allow | 34 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 14070019 | MOBILE ENABLEMENT OF EXISTING WEB SITES | November 2013 | February 2019 | Allow | 60 | 8 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13801830 | MOBILE ENABLEMENT OF EXISTING WEB SITES | March 2013 | February 2019 | Allow | 60 | 8 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13538934 | METHOD FOR DETECTING AND ANALYZING SITE QUALITY | June 2012 | June 2018 | Allow | 60 | 7 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 13301828 | VISUALIZING TOTAL ORDER RELATION OF NODES IN A STRUCTURED DOCUMENT | November 2011 | January 2015 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13159239 | ENABLING ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS FOR LIMITED-CAPABILITY COMPUTING DEVICES | June 2011 | July 2015 | Allow | 49 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12703872 | XML POST-PROCESSING HARDWARE ACCELERATION | February 2010 | April 2015 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11780776 | GENERATION OF REPRESENTATIVE DOCUMENT COMPONENTS | July 2007 | February 2016 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 11648970 | SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR SYNCHRONIZED MEDIA PLAYBACK BETWEEN ELECTRONIC DEVICES | January 2007 | June 2010 | Allow | 42 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11522177 | Text analysis devices, articles of manufacture, and text analysis methods | September 2006 | February 2015 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 11470671 | EDITING OBJECTS CONTAINED IN DIFFERENT PAGES OF A BUSINESS FORM VIA A "POSITION ADJUSTMENT" OPERATION OR A "COPY" OPERATION | September 2006 | October 2009 | Allow | 37 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 11293477 | Web page authoring | December 2005 | May 2013 | Abandon | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner AMIN, MUSTAFA A.
With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 16.7% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner AMIN, MUSTAFA A works in Art Unit 2194 and has examined 29 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 89.7%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 48 months.
Examiner AMIN, MUSTAFA A's allowance rate of 89.7% places them in the 72% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by AMIN, MUSTAFA A receive 3.55 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 94% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by AMIN, MUSTAFA A is 48 months. This places the examiner in the 8% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a -16.7% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by AMIN, MUSTAFA A. This interview benefit is in the 2% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 23.4% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 32% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 31.6% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 46% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 200.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 94% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. Before filing a full appeal brief, strongly consider requesting a PAC. The PAC provides an opportunity for the examiner and supervisory personnel to reconsider the rejection before the case proceeds to the PTAB.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 55.6% of appeals filed. This is in the 27% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 20.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 100.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 91% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 6.9% of allowed cases (in the 89% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 15% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.