Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17139157 | CODELESS DEVELOPMENT OF ENTERPRISE APPLICATION | December 2020 | January 2023 | Allow | 24 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17114898 | Systems And Methods For Micro-Scheduler Testing Framework | December 2020 | September 2022 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16949741 | WORKFLOW PATCHING | November 2020 | November 2023 | Allow | 36 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17082250 | SELECTIVE INJECTION OF GC SAFEPOINTS FOR JNI INVOCATIONS | October 2020 | October 2024 | Allow | 48 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17030245 | MANAGED ORCHESTRATION OF VIRTUAL MACHINE INSTANCE MIGRATION | September 2020 | August 2024 | Abandon | 47 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17024745 | APPLICATION MIGRATION USING COST-AWARE CODE DEPENDENCY GRAPH | September 2020 | May 2023 | Allow | 32 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17023560 | GENERATION OF EQUIVALENT MICROSERVICES TO REPLACE EXISTING OBJECT-ORIENTED APPLICATION | September 2020 | October 2022 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17013557 | Automatic Control Identification | September 2020 | January 2023 | Allow | 28 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17003476 | Deep Neural Networks Compiler for a Trace-Based Accelerator | August 2020 | August 2023 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16987032 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING OPTIMAL OPERATION PATH, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | August 2020 | December 2024 | Abandon | 53 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 16985647 | SECURING SOFTWARE INSTALLATION THROUGH DEEP GRAPH LEARNING | August 2020 | January 2022 | Allow | 17 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 16926366 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DYNAMICALLY SIMULATING LOAD TO AN APPLICATION UNDER TEST | July 2020 | January 2023 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16913756 | SYSTEM TO ANALYZE AND ENHANCE SOFTWARE BASED ON GRAPH ATTENTION NETWORKS | June 2020 | December 2022 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16897263 | COMPUTING HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE DESIGN TESTING AUDITABILITY, INCLUDING FOR CRITICAL CONTROL SYSTEMS, FUNCTIONAL SAFETY, AND AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE COMPONENT CERTIFICATION | June 2020 | January 2023 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16889451 | TECHNOLOGIES FOR CREATING AND DISTRIBUTING INTEGRATION CONNECTORS IN A CLOUD SERVICE BROKERAGE SYSTEM | June 2020 | April 2023 | Allow | 35 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 16885223 | SYNCHRONIZATION OF CUSTOMIZATIONS FOR ENTERPRISE SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS | May 2020 | December 2024 | Abandon | 54 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16884425 | METHOD, APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM FOR MONITORING A DATA CHAIN | May 2020 | September 2022 | Abandon | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16865471 | NEURAL NETWORK IMAGE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM, NEURAL NETWORK BUILDING SYSTEM AND METHOD | May 2020 | December 2022 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16865852 | Compilation Method | May 2020 | February 2022 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16838113 | PAUSE AND RESUME IN DATABASE SYSTEM WORKLOAD CAPTURE AND REPLAY | April 2020 | March 2023 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16833088 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DYNAMICALLY LOGGING APPLICATION DATA | March 2020 | March 2025 | Abandon | 59 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16813138 | DELTA IMAGE UPDATE | March 2020 | December 2021 | Abandon | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16798474 | SYSTEM AND METHOD TO EXTRACT SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS FROM NATURAL LANGUAGE | February 2020 | November 2022 | Abandon | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16730600 | RELATIONAL LOGIC INTEGRATION | December 2019 | October 2021 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16705448 | METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND PORTAL FOR ACCELERATING ASPECTS OF DATA ANALYTICS APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT AND DEPLOYMENT | December 2019 | January 2021 | Allow | 13 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 16693123 | System And Methods for Patch Management | November 2019 | June 2024 | Allow | 55 | 6 | 0 | No | No |
| 16595794 | REUSABLE TEST CASES FOR IDENTIFIABLE PATTERNS | October 2019 | April 2024 | Abandon | 54 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16590404 | APPLYING SECURITY MITIGATION MEASURES FOR STACK CORRUPTION EXPLOITATION IN INTERMEDIATE CODE FILES | October 2019 | October 2021 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16549947 | PARSING SOURCE CODE INTO A LINEAR ARRAY | August 2019 | June 2020 | Allow | 10 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 16536711 | BUILDING A FEDERATED LEARNING FRAMEWORK | August 2019 | June 2024 | Allow | 58 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16533327 | System and Method Implementing a Mock Server | August 2019 | January 2023 | Abandon | 42 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16531150 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED TESTING OF APPLICATION PROGRAM INTERFACE (API) | August 2019 | July 2022 | Abandon | 35 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 16527869 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SECURE PEER DEPLOYMENT OF SOFTWARE TO NETWORKED DEVICES | July 2019 | March 2022 | Abandon | 31 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16477493 | Method for Analysing the Rules of Changes Between the Levels of Use of Resources of a Computer System | July 2019 | July 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16457772 | CONTROL OF SCHEDULING DEPENDENCIES BY A NEURAL NETWORK COMPILER | June 2019 | October 2021 | Abandon | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16446326 | APPLICATION INSTRUMENTATION CODE EXTENSION | June 2019 | November 2020 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16442325 | MANAGED ORCHESTRATION OF VIRTUAL MACHINE INSTANCE MIGRATION | June 2019 | February 2021 | Abandon | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16442331 | MANAGED ORCHESTRATION OF VIRTUAL MACHINE INSTANCE MIGRATION | June 2019 | December 2021 | Abandon | 30 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16425878 | COMPUTER RESOURCE SCHEDULING USING GENERATIVE ADVERSARIAL NETWORKS | May 2019 | October 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16410158 | SOURCE CODE TRANSLATION | May 2019 | April 2021 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16401665 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR INTELLIGENT ENVIRONMENT AWARE SOFTWARE DEFINED ENTERPRISE MULTI-APPLICATION PROTECTION | May 2019 | August 2023 | Abandon | 51 | 6 | 0 | No | No |
| 16386551 | Interactive And Dynamic Search Based Approach To Software Refactoring Recommendations | April 2019 | September 2021 | Abandon | 29 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16385306 | Managing Test Coverage For A Software Application | April 2019 | April 2022 | Allow | 36 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16385305 | NETWORK DEVICE PERFORMANCE METRICS DETERMINATION | April 2019 | February 2023 | Allow | 46 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 16384209 | METHOD, DEVICE AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR MANAGING DEDICATED PROCESSING RESOURCES | April 2019 | March 2023 | Allow | 47 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16357658 | FIRMWARE OVER-THE-AIR ORCHESTRATION FOR IOT DEVICES | March 2019 | February 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16281721 | Real-Time Version Controller | February 2019 | June 2023 | Abandon | 52 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16277178 | COMPILATION METHOD | February 2019 | March 2020 | Allow | 13 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 16274305 | UPDATING FIRMWARE OF A MICROCONTROLLER | February 2019 | May 2021 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16272887 | APPLICATION FEATURE CHANGE DETECTION | February 2019 | April 2023 | Abandon | 50 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16271519 | INTEGRATION OF WORKFLOW AND LOGICAL DATA OBJECTS USING VISUAL PROGRAMMING | February 2019 | January 2021 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16266915 | COMPILE-TIME SCHEDULING | February 2019 | January 2021 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16265402 | EFFICIENT HANDLING OF TRIGGER TRANSACTIONS IN A WORKLOAD MANAGEMENT ENVIRONMENT | February 2019 | December 2020 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16264399 | PERFORMING CUSTOMIZED DATA COMPACTION FOR EFFICIENT PARALLEL DATA PROCESSING AMONGST A SET OF COMPUTING RESOURCES | January 2019 | May 2021 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16264356 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR JUST-IN-TIME APPLICATION IMPLEMENTATION | January 2019 | May 2025 | Allow | 60 | 8 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16259470 | AUTOMATIC FRAMEWORK TO CREATE QA TEST PASS | January 2019 | September 2022 | Allow | 43 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 16259704 | AUTOMATED TEST CASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND METHODS | January 2019 | April 2021 | Allow | 27 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16259454 | SOFTWARE COMPONENT DEFECT PREDICTION USING CLASSIFICATION MODELS THAT GENERATE HIERARCHICAL COMPONENT CLASSIFICATIONS | January 2019 | June 2022 | Allow | 40 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16304263 | HYPERCONVERGED SYSTEM EQUIPPED WITH AN ORCHESTRATOR FOR INSTALLING AND COORDINATING CONTAINER PODS ON A CLUSTER OF CONTAINER HOSTS | November 2018 | July 2021 | Abandon | 32 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16144780 | ASYNCHRONOUS SELF-PROVING TRANSACTIONS | September 2018 | June 2021 | Abandon | 33 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 16144992 | METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR SINGLE ENTITY BUFFER POOL MANAGEMENT | September 2018 | May 2023 | Allow | 55 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16141093 | REMEDYING BAD SERVICE FIXES HAVING SUBSEQUENT DEPENDENT FIXES | September 2018 | March 2022 | Allow | 42 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16141089 | CODE DEPENDENCY INFLUENCED BUG LOCALIZATION | September 2018 | March 2021 | Allow | 29 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16138505 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND FIRMWARE UPDATE METHOD | September 2018 | November 2020 | Abandon | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16136348 | AUTOMATED COMPATIBILITY VERIFICATION FOR SOFTWARE PURCHASES PRIOR TO PURCHASE | September 2018 | October 2022 | Abandon | 49 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16036257 | AUTOMATIC UPDATING OF AN APPLICATION EXECUTING ON AN APPLICATION SERVER | July 2018 | May 2022 | Allow | 46 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 16034679 | COMMUNICATION APPARATUS FOR WIRELESSLY COMMUNICATING WITH ANOTHER APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM | July 2018 | February 2021 | Allow | 31 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16033601 | PROGRAM PRODUCT, UPDATE METHOD, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS | July 2018 | August 2020 | Abandon | 25 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16068782 | DETERMINING VISUAL TESTING COVERAGES | July 2018 | January 2020 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16028700 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SUPPORTING CUSTOM HOOKS DURING PATCHING IN AN APPLICATION SERVER ENVIRONMENT | July 2018 | October 2021 | Allow | 39 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 16027491 | SOFTWARE PATCH ORDERING | July 2018 | January 2021 | Allow | 30 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16007689 | PARSING SOURCE CODE INTO A LINEAR ARRAY | June 2018 | May 2019 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15781929 | SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENTS | June 2018 | January 2020 | Abandon | 19 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15777834 | IN-VEHICLE UPDATING DEVICE, UPDATING SYSTEM, AND UPDATE PROCESSING PROGRAM | May 2018 | June 2020 | Abandon | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15975666 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR INTERMEDIATE REPRESENTATION OF APPLICATIONS | May 2018 | October 2020 | Abandon | 29 | 8 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 15772991 | METHOD, DEVICE AND RELATED SYSTEM FOR DYNAMICALLY REPAIRING APPLICATION | May 2018 | October 2020 | Allow | 30 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 15955160 | APPLICATION STATE MONITORING | April 2018 | August 2021 | Allow | 40 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15953104 | TECHNOLOGIES FOR CREATING AND DISTRIBUTING INTEGRATION CONNECTORS IN A CLOUD SERVICE BROKERAGE SYSTEM | April 2018 | July 2020 | Abandon | 27 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15767252 | BYTECODE GENERATION FROM UML MODELS | April 2018 | September 2020 | Allow | 29 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15894062 | SOURCE CODE TRANSLATION | February 2018 | January 2019 | Allow | 11 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15894096 | SOURCE CODE TRANSLATION | February 2018 | January 2019 | Allow | 11 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15848557 | DUAL BOOT OPERATING SYSTEM INSTALLATION USING MULTIPLE REDUNDANT DRIVES | December 2017 | October 2022 | Abandon | 57 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15849560 | DYNAMICALLY REPLACING A CALL TO A SOFTWARE LIBRARY WITH A CALL TO AN ACCELERATOR | December 2017 | February 2023 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 15848056 | DEBUGGING METHOD | December 2017 | March 2021 | Allow | 39 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 15846707 | METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND PORTAL USING SOFTWARE CONTAINERS FOR ACCELERATING ASPECTS OF DATA ANALYTICS APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT AND DEPLOYMENT | December 2017 | July 2019 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15842428 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MICRO-SCHEDULER TESTING FRAMEWORK | December 2017 | September 2020 | Allow | 33 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15835932 | ELECTRONIC APPARATUS, METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THEREOF AND DISPLAY APPARATUS | December 2017 | October 2020 | Abandon | 34 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 15818577 | DECOUPLING DYNAMIC PROGRAM ANALYSIS FROM EXECUTION IN VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS | November 2017 | November 2018 | Allow | 12 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15677939 | String Logging in an Embedded System | August 2017 | December 2021 | Allow | 52 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 15675319 | DETECTING SCRIPTED OR OTHERWISE ANOMALOUS INTERACTIONS WITH SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM | August 2017 | January 2022 | Allow | 53 | 5 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 15672135 | AUTOMATION TESTING PLATFORM FOR FACILITATING AUTOMATIC TESTING OF AN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) ENABLED APPLICATION | August 2017 | May 2021 | Abandon | 45 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15643631 | Method for Testing a Graphical Interface and Corresponding Test System | July 2017 | September 2019 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15470784 | NEURAL NETWORK FOR PROGRAM SYNTHESIS | March 2017 | June 2020 | Allow | 39 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15469418 | METHOD AND STORAGE SYSTEM FOR UPDATING SOFTWARE IN A STORAGE SYSTEM | March 2017 | July 2019 | Abandon | 28 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 15469176 | PRODUCING AN INTERNAL REPRESENTATION OF A TYPE BASED ON THE TYPE'S SOURCE REPRESENTATION | March 2017 | June 2020 | Allow | 38 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15468495 | METHOD OF CONTROLLING AUTOMATION OF TESTING APPLICATIONS AND A SYSTEM THEREFOR | March 2017 | December 2019 | Allow | 32 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 15467473 | CONTENT DRIVEN AUTOMATED UPGRADE OF RUNNING WEB APPLICATIONS IN ON-PREMISE ENVIRONMENTS | March 2017 | June 2021 | Abandon | 51 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15413651 | FRAMEWORK FOR AUTOMATED GLOBALIZATION ENABLEMENT ON DEVELOPMENT OPERATIONS | January 2017 | August 2019 | Allow | 31 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15280244 | METHODS FOR DETERMINING RESOURCE DEPENDENCY AND SYSTEMS THEREOF | September 2016 | February 2019 | Abandon | 29 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15196382 | TRANSLATION VERIFICATION TESTING | June 2016 | July 2019 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner WHEATON, BRADFORD F.
With a 25.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is below the USPTO average, indicating that appeals face more challenges here than typical.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 27.9% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner WHEATON, BRADFORD F works in Art Unit 2193 and has examined 172 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 67.4%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 45 months.
Examiner WHEATON, BRADFORD F's allowance rate of 67.4% places them in the 30% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by WHEATON, BRADFORD F receive 4.09 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 96% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by WHEATON, BRADFORD F is 45 months. This places the examiner in the 14% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a -4.4% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by WHEATON, BRADFORD F. This interview benefit is in the 7% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 14.6% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 12% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 11.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 12% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 52.6% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 47% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 54.5% of appeals filed. This is in the 26% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 20.8% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 100.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 91% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 13% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 16% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.