Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19022083 | Integrated AI-Driven System for Automating IT and Cybersecurity Operations | January 2025 | June 2025 | Allow | 5 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18621875 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR IDENTIFYING CONTROL FLOW PATTERNS AND DATAFLOW CONSTRAINTS IN SOFTWARE CODE TO DETECT SOFTWARE ANOMALIES | March 2024 | June 2024 | Allow | 3 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18409419 | SCHEDULING A PAUSABLE AUTOMATED PROCESS IN A COMPUTER NETWORK | January 2024 | May 2025 | Allow | 16 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18518007 | LARGE LANGUAGE MODULES IN MODULAR PROGRAMMING | November 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 18 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18387664 | SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATICALLY GENERATING ELECTRONIC ARTIFACTS USING EXTENDED FUNCTIONALITY | November 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 9 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18557425 | AUTOMATED ROOT CAUSE IDENTIFICATION USING DATA FLOW ANALYSIS OF PLURAL EXECUTION TRACES | October 2023 | May 2024 | Allow | 7 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18485416 | UNIVERSAL INSTALLER AND UNINSTALLER | October 2023 | July 2024 | Allow | 9 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18463858 | SMART DISTRIBUTED TRACING CONTEXT INJECTION | September 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18212688 | WORKLOAD GENERATION FOR OPTIMAL STRESS TESTING OF BIG DATA MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS | June 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18329205 | TECHNIQUES FOR CONFORMANCE TESTING COMPUTATIONAL OPERATIONS | June 2023 | July 2024 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18309060 | DERIVING A CUSTOM VERSION OF A SOFTWARE PACKAGE FROM SUPER POSITIONED QUBITS | April 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18131088 | SOFTWARE AND/OR COMPUTING HARDWARE DEVELOPMENT SECURITY THROUGH PERMISSION PROFILE ASSESSMENT OF A RETRIEVAL REQUEST FOR A DESIGN DEPENDENCY TREE BASED ON A UNIQUE IDENTIFIER SUCH AS AN IP ADDRESS | April 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18193444 | HIGH-SPEED OFFLOADING OF TRACE DATA FROM AN INTEGRATED CIRCUIT | March 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18171244 | EXPERIMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICE | February 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 28 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18165975 | VEHICLE CONTROL SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONFIRMING SOFTWARE CONSISTENCY | February 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 22 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 18161590 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DEPLOYING AN APPLICATION ON AN OPTIMAL CLOUD PLATFORM | January 2023 | March 2025 | Abandon | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18160760 | UPGRADING MULTI-INSTANCE SOFTWARE USING ENFORCED COMPUTING ZONE ORDER | January 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18082337 | SYSTEM, METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR COMPUTER PROGRAM CREATION FROM NATURAL LANGUAGE INPUT | December 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18076267 | TECHNIQUES FOR BUILDING DATA CENTERS IN CLOUD REGIONS WITH VERSION SETS | December 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18061846 | SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR MACHINE LEARNING TRAINING DATA SELECTION | December 2022 | October 2023 | Allow | 10 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17993624 | Application Debugging Method, Apparatus, Device, and Medium | November 2022 | October 2024 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17979741 | TECHNIQUES FOR LARGE-SCALE FUNCTIONAL TESTING IN CLOUD-COMPUTING ENVIRONMENTS | November 2022 | August 2023 | Allow | 10 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17976604 | ISSUE TRACKING SYSTEMS AND METHODS | October 2022 | December 2023 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17970996 | UPGRADE INFRASTRUCTURE WITH INTEGRATION POINTS HAVING DYNAMICALLY DETERMINED CALLBACKS | October 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17958132 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COMPILE-TIME DEPENDENCY INJECTION AND LAZY SERVICE ACTIVATION FRAMEWORK | September 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17931640 | SOURCE CODE REPOSITORY DEBUG CHAINING | September 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17930957 | AUTOMATICALLY PRODUCING AND CODE-SIGNING BINARIES | September 2022 | May 2023 | Allow | 8 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17941904 | MEMORY SYSTEM FIRMWARE UPDATE USING VIRTUAL SLOTS | September 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 32 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17822294 | NANOSERVICE COMPUTING AND ARCHITECTURE | August 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 32 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17893155 | USE OF CRDS AS DESCRIPTORS FOR APPLICATIONS, APPLICATION COMPONENTS, DEPLOYMENTS, CLOUDS, AI/ML MODELS, AND RTE IN AN O-RAN SYSTEM | August 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17820194 | MECHANISM FOR DEPLOYING LEGACY APPLICATIONS ON NEW GENERATION HYPERSCALERS | August 2022 | January 2024 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17887002 | SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATED MALICIOUS SOFTWARE DETECTION | August 2022 | February 2023 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17883899 | CHANGE ESTIMATION IN VERSION CONTROL SYSTEM | August 2022 | May 2025 | Abandon | 33 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17816206 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR RECORDING DEVICE LIFECYCLE TRANSACTIONS AS VERSIONED BLOCKS IN A BLOCKCHAIN NETWORK USING A TRANSACTION CONNECTOR AND BROKER SERVICE | July 2022 | February 2024 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17877395 | METHOD FOR MITIGATING MEMORY ACCESS CONFLICTS IN A MULTI-CORE GRAPH COMPILER | July 2022 | April 2024 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17865554 | TECHNIQUES FOR MANAGING A COLLABORATIVE DATA MANAGEMENT AND DELIVERY PLATFORM | July 2022 | July 2024 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17864493 | Software Testing Using a Quantum Computer System | July 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17862727 | EXTENDED REALITY PLATFORM AND MACHINE LEARNING ENGINE FOR AUTOMATED CODE ERROR RESOLUTION | July 2022 | February 2024 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17857701 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPTIMIZING A MACHINE LEARNING-INFORMED AUTOMATED DECISIONING WORKFLOW IN A MACHINE LEARNING TASK-ORIENTED DIGITAL THREAT MITIGATION PLATFORM | July 2022 | December 2022 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17852930 | Service Upgrade Method, Apparatus, and System | June 2022 | March 2024 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17853105 | USING INDENTATION TO TRIM OUTPUT OF A LANGUAGE SYNTHESIS MODEL | June 2022 | May 2024 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17751910 | AGENT-SIDE CHATBOT SIMULATOR WITH THROTTLING CAPABILITIES | May 2022 | February 2024 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17738107 | STRESS TEST IMPACT ISOLATION AND MAPPING | May 2022 | January 2023 | Allow | 8 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17736781 | UPDATING REMOTE DATABASES | May 2022 | November 2024 | Abandon | 31 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17717941 | REGISTER ALLOCATION HEURISTICS ORDER | April 2022 | January 2024 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17715747 | Systems and Methods for Trusted and Secure Application Deployment Via Collective Signature Verification of the Application Artifacts | April 2022 | December 2022 | Allow | 8 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17710668 | CROSS-HYPERVISOR LIVE-MOUNT OF BACKED UP VIRTUAL MACHINE DATA | March 2022 | June 2023 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17688665 | SCHEDULING A PAUSABLE AUTOMATED PROCESS IN A COMPUTER NETWORK | March 2022 | November 2023 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17684048 | OFFLINE SELF CONTENT MANAGEMENT INFOTAINMENT SYSTEM | March 2022 | June 2024 | Abandon | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17678457 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DYNAMIC MONITORING OF CHANGES IN CODING DATA | February 2022 | January 2024 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17676515 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MULTI-SELECTION SOFTWARE PACKAGE FILE VALIDATION | February 2022 | August 2024 | Abandon | 30 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17673647 | LOADER AND RUNTIME OPERATIONS FOR HETEROGENEOUS CODE OBJECTS | February 2022 | March 2024 | Allow | 25 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17668845 | Execution of Services Concurrently | February 2022 | February 2023 | Allow | 12 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17592686 | IN-MEMORY TRACE WITH OVERLAPPING PROCESSING AND LOGOUT | February 2022 | December 2023 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17589969 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPTIMIZING A MACHINE LEARNING-INFORMED AUTOMATED DECISIONING WORKFLOW IN A MACHINE LEARNING TASK-ORIENTED DIGITAL THREAT MITIGATION PLATFORM | February 2022 | April 2022 | Allow | 2 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17588759 | FEATURE ROLLBACK FOR INCAPABLE MOBILE DEVICES | January 2022 | October 2024 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17589637 | CONFIGURING AUTOMATED WORKFLOWS FOR APPLICATION PERFORMANCE MONITORING | January 2022 | July 2024 | Allow | 29 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17647088 | DYNAMIC DEBUG TRACING WITH MACHINE LEARNING | January 2022 | April 2024 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17566805 | FACILITATING GENERATION OF CONTEXTUAL PROFILE DATA | December 2021 | December 2023 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17563833 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD FOR UPDATING A PROGRAM BY PARTIALLY RELOCATING THE PROGRAM | December 2021 | October 2023 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17597083 | METHOD OF DEBUGGING APPLET, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | December 2021 | August 2023 | Abandon | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17622130 | AUTOMATIC CORRECTNESS AND PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT OF BINARY TRANSFORMATION SYSTEMS | December 2021 | June 2022 | Allow | 6 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17552472 | CLOUD AGNOSTIC SHARED LOAD TESTING PLATFORM | December 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 33 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17553432 | SECURE DEBUGGING IN MULTITENANT CLOUD ENVIRONMENT | December 2021 | September 2023 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17619501 | METHOD OF TESTING APPLET PERFORMANCE, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM | December 2021 | December 2023 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17618930 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE, CONTROL FLOW INSPECTION METHOD, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | December 2021 | August 2023 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17549321 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CREATING CONFIGURATIONAL BLOCKS USED FOR BUILDING CONTINUOUS REAL-TIME SOFTWARE LOGICAL SEQUENCES | December 2021 | October 2024 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17546878 | OPERATIONAL MULTIPLIERS FOR HETEROGENEOUS BUILD ARCHITECTURES | December 2021 | July 2023 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17545854 | COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR PERFORMANCE TESTING OF MODELS | December 2021 | March 2023 | Allow | 15 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17536163 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING COROUTINES | November 2021 | February 2023 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17533039 | RULE TESTING FRAMEWORK FOR EXECUTABLE RULES OF A SERVICE PROVIDER SYSTEM | November 2021 | April 2023 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17529021 | AUTOMATED TRACKING OF CONSISTENT SOFTWARE TEST FAILURES | November 2021 | September 2023 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17525784 | System and Method for Identifying Performance Bottlenecks | November 2021 | July 2024 | Allow | 33 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17520144 | CODE-TO-UTILIZATION METRIC BASED CODE ARCHITECTURE ADAPTATION | November 2021 | October 2023 | Abandon | 23 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17608767 | APPLICATIONS THAT INCLUDE EXECUTION LOCATION MARKERS AND AN AWARENESS BUILDER ENGINE | November 2021 | July 2023 | Abandon | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17510259 | METHOD FOR OPERATING A CONTROL UNIT WHEN TESTING SOFTWARE OF THE CONTROL UNIT, AND METHOD FOR OPERATING A TEST COMPUTER WHEN TESTING SOFTWARE OF A CONTROL UNIT | October 2021 | October 2023 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17508150 | DEVELOPMENT LANDSCAPE BUILD SYSTEM | October 2021 | June 2023 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17500397 | MIGRATION OF SOFTWARE EXTENSIONS | October 2021 | September 2023 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17450411 | SYSTEMS INDUSTRY BENCHMARKING AND CORPORATION SYSTEMS TOOL RECOMMENDATION | October 2021 | May 2023 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17450219 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MODEL-DRIVEN MULTI-CLOUD CONTACT CENTER | October 2021 | May 2023 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17493068 | Systems and Methods for Trusted and Secure Application Deployment Via Collective Signature Verification of the Application Artifacts | October 2021 | March 2022 | Allow | 5 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17492255 | WORKLOAD GENERATION FOR OPTIMAL STRESS TESTING OF BIG DATA MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS | October 2021 | April 2023 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17490858 | APPLICATION LAUNCH SUPPORT | September 2021 | June 2023 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17482836 | CODE EXECUTION RECORDING VISUALIZATION TECHNIQUE | September 2021 | June 2023 | Abandon | 21 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17481399 | SMART TEST DATA WORKLOAD GENERATION | September 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 36 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17448054 | AIDING DIAGNOSIS OF ERRORS IN CODE | September 2021 | July 2023 | Allow | 22 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17473707 | IDENTIFYING DATA INCONSISTENCIES AND DATA CONTENTION BASED ON HISTORIC DEBUGGING TRACES | September 2021 | November 2022 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17473625 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VALIDATING DATA | September 2021 | April 2024 | Allow | 31 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17472975 | LOCAL MEMORY SHARING BETWEEN KERNELS | September 2021 | July 2023 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17446309 | TESTING VIRTUAL REALITY INTEGRATION WITH A DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT | August 2021 | June 2024 | Allow | 33 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17460611 | SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATED MALICIOUS SOFTWARE DETECTION | August 2021 | May 2022 | Allow | 9 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17393240 | MUTATION TESTING OF DATABASE FUNCTIONS | August 2021 | June 2022 | Allow | 10 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17387958 | TEST METHOD BASED ON IMPROVED REST PROTOCOLS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | July 2021 | September 2023 | Abandon | 25 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17373192 | INSTRUMENTATION TRACE CAPTURE TECHNIQUE | July 2021 | May 2023 | Abandon | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17371304 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED BOT TESTING SCENARIO SIMULATIONS | July 2021 | March 2023 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17366160 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING PERFORMANCE FOR USE CASES IN SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS | July 2021 | November 2023 | Allow | 28 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17362144 | PROGRAM UPDATE METHOD AND UPDATE SYSTEM | June 2021 | January 2024 | Allow | 31 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17351968 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED PATCH COMPATIBILITY OF APPLICATIONS | June 2021 | July 2022 | Allow | 13 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17347897 | VEHICLE CONTROL SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONFIRMING SOFTWARE CONSISTENCY | June 2021 | November 2022 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17339682 | SMART DISTRIBUTED TRACING CONTEXT INJECTION | June 2021 | July 2023 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner PAN, HANG.
With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 45.5% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner PAN, HANG works in Art Unit 2193 and has examined 349 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 86.0%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 23 months.
Examiner PAN, HANG's allowance rate of 86.0% places them in the 58% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by PAN, HANG receive 2.10 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 70% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by PAN, HANG is 23 months. This places the examiner in the 75% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +4.8% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by PAN, HANG. This interview benefit is in the 29% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 29.2% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 46% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 18.8% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 15% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 100.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 70% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 77.8% of appeals filed. This is in the 65% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 42.9% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 27.9% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 19% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 1.1% of allowed cases (in the 70% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments more often than average to place applications in condition for allowance (MPEP § 1302.04).
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 13% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.