Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17133491 | SOFTWARE UPGRADE STABILITY RECOMMENDATIONS | December 2020 | March 2024 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17126640 | SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT WORKBENCH | December 2020 | April 2023 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16952453 | CAPTURING TRANSITION STACKS FOR EVALUATING SERVER-SIDE APPLICATIONS | November 2020 | April 2023 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17094741 | AUTOMATED TESTING OF MOBILE DEVICES USING VISUAL ANALYSIS | November 2020 | February 2024 | Allow | 39 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17085898 | MANAGING ALERT MESSAGES FOR APPLICATIONS AND ACCESS PERMISSIONS | October 2020 | June 2023 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17081590 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PARTIAL PERSONALIZATION DURING APPLICATION UPDATE | October 2020 | March 2023 | Allow | 29 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17077742 | SELECTION OF COMPUTER SYSTEM DEPLOYMENTS TO MOCK FOR TESTING | October 2020 | March 2023 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17070244 | DIAGNOSING ERRORS IN DATA STORAGE AND ARCHIVING IN A CLOUD OR NETWORKING ENVIRONMENT | October 2020 | July 2023 | Abandon | 33 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17036918 | AUTOMATED TESTING OF SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS | September 2020 | January 2024 | Allow | 39 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17022493 | INTELLIGENT SERVICES AND TRAINING AGENT FOR APPLICATION DEPENDENCY DISCOVERY, REPORTING, AND MANAGEMENT TOOL | September 2020 | January 2023 | Allow | 28 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17000349 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TESTING SOURCE CODE | August 2020 | July 2023 | Abandon | 35 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 16939271 | AUTOMATICALLY CAPTURING WEATHER DATA DURING ENGINEERING TESTS | July 2020 | August 2023 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16912445 | BYTECODE TRANSFORMATIONS USING VIRTUAL ARTIFACTS | June 2020 | February 2024 | Allow | 44 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16839915 | INTELLIGENT APPLICATION SCENARIO TESTING AND ERROR DETECTION | April 2020 | April 2024 | Allow | 48 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16832838 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING MODIFIED APPLICATIONS FOR CONCURRENT TESTING | March 2020 | July 2023 | Allow | 40 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16823393 | IDENTIFYING FLAWED DEPENDENCIES IN DEPLOYED APPLICATIONS | March 2020 | July 2023 | Allow | 40 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16822668 | TECHNIQUES TO DEPLOY AN APPLICATION AS A CLOUD COMPUTING SERVICE | March 2020 | November 2021 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16809993 | INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT FOR DEVELOPING AND COMPILING QUERY LANGUAGE SCHEMAS FOR APPLICATION PROGRAM INTERFACES | March 2020 | August 2022 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16779365 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FUZZING TEST ORCHESTRATION USING REINFORCEMENT LEARNING | January 2020 | April 2023 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16724977 | ANALYSIS OF REAL-TIME SOFTWARE | December 2019 | January 2023 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16720927 | ACTIVE DRIVE API | December 2019 | January 2021 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16704925 | SOFTWARE DIAGNOSTIC CONTEXT SELECTION AND USE | December 2019 | March 2024 | Allow | 52 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16619449 | SCHEME FOR TEST AUTOMATION | December 2019 | January 2023 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16618402 | CONTAINER DOCKERFILE AND CONTAINER MIRROR IMAGE QUICK GENERATION METHODS AND SYSTEMS | December 2019 | March 2023 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16501486 | DATA INTEGRITY ANALYSIS TOOL | November 2019 | February 2023 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16677474 | Methods and Systems for Identifying, Handling, and Debugging a Hung Thread | November 2019 | April 2022 | Allow | 30 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16668969 | AUTOMATING INTEGRATION TEST CASES BY RESOLVING TEST CASE DEPENDENCIES | October 2019 | June 2022 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16567993 | CONVERGENCE AMONG CONCURRENTLY EXECUTING THREADS | September 2019 | April 2022 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16567897 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR HOSTING MULTIPLE FIRMWARE IMAGES | September 2019 | August 2022 | Abandon | 35 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 16521161 | AUTOMATED GENERATION AND CONSISTENCY CHECKING OF SOFTWARE OBJECTS | July 2019 | October 2021 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16514741 | CERTIFICATE MANAGEMENT IN SEGREGATED COMPUTER NETWORKS | July 2019 | August 2021 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16459211 | FIELD PROPERTY EXTRACTION AND FIELD VALUE VALIDATION USING A VALIDATED DATASET | July 2019 | January 2021 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16457251 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR APPLICATION EXCEPTION HANDLING | June 2019 | January 2022 | Allow | 31 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16454611 | INTELLIGENT SERVICES AND TRAINING AGENT FOR APPLICATION DEPENDENCY DISCOVERY, REPORTING, AND MANAGEMENT TOOL | June 2019 | June 2020 | Allow | 12 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 16455380 | Machine-Assisted Quality Assurance and Software Improvement | June 2019 | August 2022 | Abandon | 38 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16453014 | CHAT BOT DIAGNOSTIC VISUALIZATION | June 2019 | January 2023 | Allow | 43 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16446905 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATING FUNCTIONAL TESTING | June 2019 | October 2020 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16441635 | METHODS FOR PROVIDING AN ENTERPRISE SYNTHETIC MONITORING FRAMEWORK | June 2019 | September 2022 | Allow | 39 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16442042 | WATCHER: PRECISE AND FULLY-AUTOMATIC ON-SITE FAILURE DIAGNOSIS | June 2019 | November 2022 | Allow | 41 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16424028 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SOFTWARE BUILD FILE ANALYTICS | May 2019 | June 2021 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16419210 | UPGRADE OF A SOFTWARE PRODUCT | May 2019 | March 2022 | Allow | 34 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16411250 | MANAGING SOFTWARE PROGRAMS | May 2019 | February 2021 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16410033 | SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT WORKBENCH | May 2019 | September 2020 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16408074 | MACHINE LEARNING BASED TEST CASE PREDICTION AND AUTOMATION LEVERAGING THE HTML DOCUMENT OBJECT MODEL | May 2019 | March 2022 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16394513 | TECHNIQUES TO DEPLOY AN APPLICATION AS A CLOUD COMPUTING SERVICE | April 2019 | December 2019 | Allow | 8 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 16393505 | SYSTEM FOR DIAGNOSING SOFTWARE FOR VEHICLE AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF | April 2019 | April 2022 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16374140 | PRESENTING DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CODE ENTITY INVOCATIONS | April 2019 | June 2020 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16354868 | OPTIMIZING UPDATES TO DISTRIBUTED DATA PROCESSING APPLICATIONS | March 2019 | August 2021 | Allow | 29 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16289454 | VIRTUAL REALITY CAPTURE AND REPLAY SYSTEMS AND METHODS | February 2019 | October 2021 | Abandon | 32 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16327112 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM | February 2019 | July 2021 | Abandon | 29 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16272408 | Preinstalled Application Management Method for Mobile Terminal and Mobile Terminal | February 2019 | April 2021 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16271182 | AUTOMATICALLY IDENTIFYING AND HIGHLIGHTING DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HISTORIC TRACES | February 2019 | May 2021 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16262766 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PARTIAL PERSONALIZATION DURING APPLICATION UPDATE | January 2019 | July 2020 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16242414 | SOURCE CODE SIMILARITY DETECTION USING DIGITAL FINGERPRINTS | January 2019 | April 2021 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16240612 | CODE ANALYTICS AND PUBLICATION PLATFORM | January 2019 | June 2021 | Allow | 30 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16224581 | DEBUGGING RULES BASED ON EXECUTION EVENTS STORED IN AN EVENT LOG | December 2018 | June 2021 | Allow | 30 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16221726 | CONTENT DEVELOPMENT DEVICE | December 2018 | April 2022 | Allow | 39 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16309620 | AN APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR GENERATING AND PROCESSING A TRACE STREAM INDICATIVE OF INSTRUCTION EXECUTION BY PROCESSING CIRCUITRY | December 2018 | March 2021 | Allow | 27 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16213858 | SYSTEM FOR FEDERATED GENERATION OF USER INTERFACES FROM A SET OF RULES | December 2018 | September 2021 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16134910 | BACKGROUND FIRMWARE UPDATE | September 2018 | June 2023 | Abandon | 57 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16133438 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR WORKFLOW APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACES (APIS) | September 2018 | November 2020 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16129520 | ACTIVE DRIVE API | September 2018 | May 2021 | Allow | 32 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16083977 | TEST SELECTION DEVICE | September 2018 | April 2022 | Abandon | 43 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 16081830 | TERMINAL DEVICE AND SOFTWARE REWRITING PROGRAM | August 2018 | June 2021 | Abandon | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16029372 | CACHE-BASED TRACING FOR TIME TRAVEL DEBUGGING AND ANALYSIS | July 2018 | June 2021 | Allow | 35 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15918708 | NON-MONOTONIC EVENTUAL CONVERGENCE FOR DESIRED STATE CONFIGURATION | March 2018 | September 2020 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15753255 | GENERATING A COMBINED ENTITY WORKFLOW | February 2018 | February 2021 | Allow | 36 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15888599 | INTEGRATED NOTE-TAKING FUNCTIONALITY FOR COMPUTING SYSTEM ENTITIES | February 2018 | May 2021 | Allow | 39 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15749657 | SELECTIVE APPLICATION TESTING | February 2018 | March 2020 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15749032 | FIRMWARE UPDATE OF AN INTERCONNECT DEVICE | January 2018 | March 2022 | Allow | 49 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 15746439 | A method of refactoring Android applications for smart watches | January 2018 | January 2020 | Abandon | 23 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15738874 | DEVICE AND METHOD FOR INTEGRATING SOFTWARE COMPONENTS INTO A DISTRIBUTED TIME-CONTROLLED REAL-TIME SYSTEM | January 2018 | April 2020 | Allow | 28 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15836971 | COGNITIVE IN-MEMORY API LOGGING | December 2017 | July 2020 | Allow | 32 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15822996 | METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR AUTOMATIC COMMUNICATION OPTIMIZATIONS IN A COMPILER BASED ON A POLYHEDRAL REPRESENTATION | November 2017 | April 2021 | Allow | 41 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15822805 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ANALYZING IMPACT OF SOFTWARE CHANGE | November 2017 | October 2020 | Abandon | 34 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 15821646 | SCHEDULING FIRMWARE OPERATIONS IN DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING SYSTEMS | November 2017 | March 2021 | Abandon | 40 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 15819958 | INTELLIGENT CODE QUALITY MONITORING | November 2017 | November 2019 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15818558 | CUSTOMIZABLE PROJECT AND HELP BUILDING INTERFACES FOR DEPLOYABLE SOFTWARE | November 2017 | September 2019 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15816377 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING CODE FOR PARALLEL PROCESSING UNITS | November 2017 | July 2020 | Allow | 32 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15806288 | PREDICTION MECHANISM FOR SUBROUTINE RETURNS IN BINARY TRANSLATION SUB-SYSTEMS OF COMPUTERS | November 2017 | September 2019 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15786344 | EFFICIENT MEANS TO TEST SERVER GENERATED APPLICATIONS ON MOBILE DEVICE | October 2017 | September 2020 | Allow | 35 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15729159 | DATA STORAGE DEVICE AND METHOD FOR REDUCING FIRMWARE UPDATE TIME AND DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM INCLUDING THE DEVICE | October 2017 | August 2020 | Allow | 35 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15557927 | DATA COPYING | September 2017 | December 2021 | Allow | 51 | 5 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 15700412 | Cognitive In-Memory API Logging | September 2017 | June 2020 | Allow | 33 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15700330 | INTRODUCING ARTIFACT INFORMATION SYSTEM AND METHOD | September 2017 | July 2020 | Allow | 34 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15700852 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR REUSING A REFINEMENT FILE IN COVERAGE GRADING | September 2017 | April 2019 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15701105 | VISUALISATION FOR GUIDED ALGORITHM DESIGN TO CREATE HARDWARE FRIENDLY ALGORITHMS | September 2017 | February 2020 | Abandon | 29 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15700435 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING AND EXECUTING AUTOMATED TEST CASES | September 2017 | September 2019 | Abandon | 24 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15556214 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, RELAY DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND SOFTWARE UPDATE METHOD | September 2017 | June 2020 | Allow | 34 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15555643 | FLOW CONTROL FOR LANGUAGE-EMBEDDED PROGRAMMING IN GENERAL PURPOSE COMPUTING ON GRAPHICS PROCESSING UNITS | September 2017 | April 2019 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15555675 | SYSTEM DESIGN SUPPORTING DEVICE, SYSTEM DESIGN SUPPORTING METHOD, AND SYSTEM DESIGN SUPPORTING PROGRAM | September 2017 | July 2019 | Abandon | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15687757 | NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM STORING INSTRUCTIONS CONTROLLING OPERATION OF MOBILE TERMINAL | August 2017 | March 2021 | Allow | 43 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15641903 | APPLICATION FUNCTIONALITY EXTENSION METHOD, APPLICATION FUNCTIONALITY EXTENSION PROGRAM, AND APPLICATION FUNCTIONALITY EXTENSION APPARATUS | July 2017 | August 2020 | Abandon | 37 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 15637432 | Impact Analysis-Based Task Redoing Method, Impact Analysis Calculation Apparatus, and One-Click Resetting Apparatus | June 2017 | November 2018 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15630551 | Updating Software Packets in Water Installation Controlling Apparatus | June 2017 | December 2019 | Abandon | 29 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15630322 | DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT SYSTEM | June 2017 | January 2022 | Abandon | 55 | 3 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 15628332 | SOFTWARE DEPLOYMENT TO NETWORK DEVICES IN CLOUD COMPUTING ENVIRONMENTS WITH DATA CONTROL POLICIES | June 2017 | August 2019 | Abandon | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15628054 | SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATED CODE CALCULATION AND AN AUTOMATED CODE CALCULATION METHOD | June 2017 | January 2019 | Abandon | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15626830 | AUTOMATIC GENERATION OF MICROSERVICES BASED ON TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION OF LEGACY CODE | June 2017 | December 2019 | Allow | 30 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15623667 | COMPATIBLE DICTIONARY LAYOUT | June 2017 | October 2019 | Allow | 28 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner WEI, ZHENG.
With a 13.6% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is below the USPTO average, indicating that appeals face more challenges here than typical.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 30.6% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner WEI, ZHENG works in Art Unit 2192 and has examined 495 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 76.4%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 43 months.
Examiner WEI, ZHENG's allowance rate of 76.4% places them in the 44% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by WEI, ZHENG receive 2.50 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 69% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by WEI, ZHENG is 43 months. This places the examiner in the 17% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +40.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by WEI, ZHENG. This interview benefit is in the 86% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 27.2% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 49% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 34.9% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 54% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 72.7% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 60% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 66.2% of appeals filed. This is in the 47% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 25.6% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 29.7% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 16% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 6.5% of allowed cases (in the 89% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.5% of allowed cases (in the 58% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.