Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19215045 | GENERATING, MANAGING, AND ORGANIZING PERSISTED DATA ELEMENTS BASED ON ONE OR MORE STATES OF AN AGENT | May 2025 | October 2025 | Allow | 5 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18651439 | MEDICAL DEVICE UPDATE SYSTEM | April 2024 | April 2025 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18436064 | UPDATING SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS TO FACILITATE COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARD REQUIREMENTS IN A DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING SYSTEM | February 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18405699 | COMPILE-TIME LINK TYPE OBJECT MANAGEMENT | January 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18402045 | AUTOMATIC FIRMWARE UPDATING | January 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18395939 | LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL-BASED SOFTWARE REVERSE ENGINEERING ASSISTANT | December 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18532191 | REAL-TIME VALIDATION OF MICROCODE UPDATES | December 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 26 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18529314 | VERSION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND INTERFACES | December 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 25 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18525598 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR UNIFIED COMPUTING ON DIGITAL AND QUANTUM COMPUTERS | November 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18511714 | UPDATE CONTROL SYSTEM, UPDATE CONTROL METHOD, NON-TRANSITORY STORAGE MEDIUM, AND IN-VEHICLE CONTROL DEVICE | November 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18489900 | SEMI-DECLARATIVE METHOD FOR INFRASTRUCTURE DEPLOYMENT AND ACCESS CONTROL | October 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18485125 | OPTIMIZED RECOMPILATION USING HARDWARE TRACING | October 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18481916 | NOTEBOOK FOR NAVIGATING CODE USING MACHINE LEARNING AND FLOW ANALYSIS | October 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18479770 | ADAPTIVE SEARCH-BASED ALLOCATION OF COMPUTATIONS TO SYNCHRONIZED, INTERCONNECTED PROCESSING ELEMENTS FOR IMPLEMENTING MACHINE LEARNING NETWORKS | October 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18470855 | DYNAMIC EVALUATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY OF COMPUTER CODE | September 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18468048 | DIFFERENTIAL CONFIGURATION UPDATES FOR MOBILE DEVICES | September 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18368266 | AUTOMATIC ASSIGNMENT OF CHANGED PERMISSIONS FOR DIAGNOSTIC PURPOSES FOR WORK CONTAINER INSTANCES THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN STARTED | September 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18282162 | CODE DEPLOYMENT | September 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18461122 | EMOTION PROCESSING SYSTEMS AND METHODS | September 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18455284 | CLOUD NATIVE AUTO-LABELING SYSTEM TO TRAIN CODE GENERATION MODELS | August 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18235461 | GRAPH PATH PREDICTION AND MASKED LANGUAGE MODELLING JOINT TRAINING ALGORITHM FOR LANGUAGE MODELS | August 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18235134 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EXECUTABLE GRAPH-BASED MODEL OWNERSHIP | August 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18446566 | Generate Program Directives Using Beam Search Guided by Neural Network Cost Model | August 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18231473 | FIRMWARE UPLOAD USING BLE CONNECTION TO BLUETOOTH MESH FIRMWARE DISTRIBUTOR NODE | August 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18231575 | GENERATION OF SERVICE-LEVEL OBJECTIVE SPECIFICATIONS USING JAVA ANNOTATION | August 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18365347 | INTELLIGENT GENERATION AND MANAGEMENT OF ESTIMATES FOR APPLICATION OF UPDATES TO A COMPUTING DEVICE | August 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18356702 | AUTOMATIC LABELING OF DATA BY AN ENTITY GATHERING THE DATA | July 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18224364 | AUTOMATED TESTING PLATFORM FOR TESTING MULTIPLE DEVICES | July 2023 | July 2024 | Allow | 12 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18219935 | DETECTING AN ERROR IN AN UPDATED SOFTWARE PACKAGE BY AUTOMATICALLY REBUILDING RELATED DOWNSTREAM PRODUCTS | July 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18346326 | FAST MEMORY MAPPED IO SUPPORT BY REGISTER SWITCH | July 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18345005 | METHOD AND SYSTEM TO OPTIMIZE POWER UTILIZATION USING AN ALTERNATIVE POWER CONVERTER WHILE OPERATING VEHICLE SOFTWARE UPDATES | June 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18345925 | AUTOMATED ERROR TROUBLESHOOTING VIA GENERATIVE AI SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANT | June 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18214627 | AUTOMATED SOFTWARE TESTING USING CHAOS ENGINEERING | June 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18341808 | SERVER, NON-TRANSITORY STORAGE MEDIUM, AND SOFTWARE UPDATE METHOD | June 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18340563 | EVALUATION OF A PRIVACY INCIDENT RISK IN COMPUTER CODE | June 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18339744 | AUTOMATICALLY GENERATING HUMAN LANGUAGE CODE DESCRIPTIONS | June 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18338863 | PROTECTION, OBFUSCATION, AND OPTIMIZATION OF BINARY EXECUTABLES USING RECOMPILATION | June 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18268055 | Operating System Update Method, Electronic Device, and Storage Medium | June 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18334935 | CROSS-LAYER POWER OPTIMIZATION OF PROGRAM CODE AND/OR SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE | June 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18210055 | TREE-BASED MERGE CONFLICT RESOLUTION WITH MULTI-TASK NEURAL TRANSFORMER | June 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 14 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18208969 | COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD FOR THE USE OF STORED SPECIFICATION PARTS | June 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18207305 | METHODS AND ARRANGEMENTS TO PROCESS COMMENTS | June 2023 | June 2024 | Allow | 13 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18327209 | AUTOMATIC ONBOARD VALIDATION OF A NEWLY TRAINED VEHICLE MACHINE LEARNING MODEL | June 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 25 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18324615 | INLINE COMPILATION OF USER DEFINED FUNCTIONS | May 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18319339 | DOMAIN SPECIFIC INLINING FOR INTERPRETERS | May 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18318715 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TRACKING ONE OR MORE APPLICATIONS | May 2023 | July 2025 | Abandon | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18317999 | METHOD TO PRIORITIZE THIRD-PARTY SOFTWARE LIBRARIES UPDATES | May 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18197008 | STATION DEVICE ON WHICH CORDLESS VACUUM CLEANER IS DOCKED AND COMMUNICATION METHOD OF THE STATION DEVICE | May 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18311574 | ONLINE IN-VEHICLE LEARNING FOR MACHINE LEARNING MODELS | May 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18250794 | DEVELOPMENT PIPELINE INTEGRATED ONGOING LEARNING FOR ASSISTED CODE REMEDIATION | April 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18308570 | AUTOMATED PROGRAM CONVERSION FOR HETEROGENEOUS AND FAAS COMPUTING WITH MINIMAL HUMAN INTERVENTION | April 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18138330 | CODE EXECUTION TRACE GENERATION WITH PRE-TRAINED LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL | April 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18304480 | CLOUD-BASED COLLABORATIVE INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION DESIGN ENVIRONMENT | April 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18137335 | CODE ENERGY EFFICIENCY | April 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18303504 | EXECUTION OF A CONDITIONAL STATEMENT BY AN ARITHMETIC AND/OR BITWISE UNIT | April 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18302237 | MACHINE LEARNING TO EMULATE SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS | April 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18135566 | SOFTWARE UPDATES IN A NETWORK INTERFACE DEVICE | April 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18299791 | PLATFORM-INDEPENDENT ARCHITECTURE FOR SECURE SYSTEM RESET | April 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18295140 | GENERATING AND PRESENTING TRANSITIVE CLOSURES FOR AN OPERATING SYSTEM | April 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18130373 | ARITHMETIC ENHANCEMENT OF C-LIKE SMART CONTRACTS FOR VERIFIABLE COMPUTATION | April 2023 | December 2024 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18193244 | AGENTLESS GITOPS AND CUSTOM RESOURCES FOR INFRASTRUCTURE ORCHESTRATION AND MANAGEMENT | March 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18188078 | CODE REFACTORING ENERGY MANAGEMENT | March 2023 | May 2025 | Abandon | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18186368 | PATCHING FOR CLOUD-BASED 5G NETWORKS | March 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18122004 | MULTI-TENANT JAVA AGENT INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEM | March 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 24 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18121709 | COMPILATION TECHNIQUE FOR SURFACE CODE ARCHITECTURE | March 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18122060 | SYSTEM, METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR UNATTENDED TEST EXECUTION BASED ON IMPACTED APPLICATION CODE | March 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18180689 | Autonomous Software Testing Agent | March 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18118807 | SOURCE CODE-BASED DETERMINATION OF DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WEB ELEMENTS OF DIFFERENT VERSIONS OF A WEB APPLICATION | March 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18178484 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF BUILDING BLOCKS IN A DEVICE APPLICATION | March 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18117300 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR COMPILER GENERATED EXTERNAL STRATEGIES | March 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 31 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 18117170 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REAL-TIME BINARY ANALYSIS WITH HOT PATCHING OF PROGRAMMABLE LOGIC CONTROLLERS | March 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18177752 | AUTOMATION ADJUSTMENT OF SOFTWARE CODE FROM CHANGES IN REPOSITORY | March 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18176607 | TRACE-BASED SURVEY FOR PULL REQUEST WORKFLOW | March 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18116112 | LENSES WITH PORTABLE BINARY CODE | March 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18175778 | Automation Controller For Upgrading An IT Infrastructure | February 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18173927 | SYSTEM AND METHOD TO IDENTIFY AND IMPROVE CONNECTION ISSUES | February 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18113679 | MANAGEMENT DATA REWRITE SYSTEM AND VEHICLE INCLUDING MANAGEMENT DATA REWRITE SYSTEM | February 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18113000 | ORCHESTRATION OF A PATTERN-BASED CONFIGURABLE PROCESS SEQUENCE | February 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18112354 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING ACTIONABLE CORRECTIONS TO AND CODE REFACTORING OF EXECUTABLE CODE | February 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18108835 | Unified Operating System for Distributed Computing | February 2023 | November 2024 | Abandon | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18041114 | METHODS, APPARATUSES, AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIA FOR SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, TESTING AND MAINTENANCE | February 2023 | March 2025 | Abandon | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18104317 | ANALYZING OPERATIONAL EVENTS OCCURRING DURING OPERATION OF A TECHNICAL INSTALLATION | February 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18157990 | Predictive Dead Store Elimination | January 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18099585 | AUTOMATIC MACHINE DEPLOYMENT AND CONFIGURATION | January 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18155939 | Source code conversion from an original computer programming language to a target programming language | January 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18153551 | OPERATION MANAGEMENT DEVICE AND OPERATION MANAGEMENT METHOD | January 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18094670 | MEMBER INVOCATION DECLARATIVE INTERCEPTION | January 2023 | March 2024 | Allow | 14 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18146031 | SOFTWARE CHANGE ANALYSIS AND AUTOMATED REMEDIATION | December 2022 | October 2024 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18003048 | METHOD OF TESTING SOFTWARE | December 2022 | May 2025 | Abandon | 29 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18084683 | SECURED INSTANT INSTALLATION OF APPLICATIONS | December 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18067625 | DEDUPLICATION OF SHARED DEPENDENCIES IN MICRO FRONTENDS | December 2022 | October 2024 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18079775 | USER INTERFACE FOR FORMAL VERIFICATION OF COMPUTER INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPATIBILITY WITH A COMPILER ARCHITECTURE | December 2022 | August 2025 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18079587 | OTA UPDATE APPARATUS AND METHOD THEREOF | December 2022 | July 2024 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18063534 | DETERMINATION OF SCHEMA COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN NEIGHBORING OPERATORS WITHIN A SEARCH QUERY STATEMENT | December 2022 | June 2024 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18060368 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING SOLUTIONS FOR ERRORS IN LOG FILES OBTAINED FROM EXECUTION ENVIRONMENTS | November 2022 | December 2025 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18070835 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLING INSTALLATION OF APPLICATION PROGRAM | November 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 29 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 18070269 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING AN INSTANT COMMUNICATION CHANNEL WITHIN INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTS | November 2022 | April 2024 | Abandon | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17925041 | INDUSTRIAL APPLICATION PACKAGE MANAGEMENT | November 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17982700 | CONTROL DEVICE AND MANAGEMENT METHOD | November 2022 | August 2025 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17980437 | MODELING FOREIGN FUNCTIONS USING EXECUTABLE REFERENCES | November 2022 | February 2024 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner ST LEGER, GEOFFREY R.
With a 33.3% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 56.2% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
✓ Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner ST LEGER, GEOFFREY R works in Art Unit 2192 and has examined 539 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 81.1%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 27 months.
Examiner ST LEGER, GEOFFREY R's allowance rate of 81.1% places them in the 52% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by ST LEGER, GEOFFREY R receive 2.14 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 58% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by ST LEGER, GEOFFREY R is 27 months. This places the examiner in the 72% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +28.1% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by ST LEGER, GEOFFREY R. This interview benefit is in the 76% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 28.4% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 51% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 41.3% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 63% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 100.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 71% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 70.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 56% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 28.6% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 35.3% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 23% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.4% of allowed cases (in the 57% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments more often than average to place applications in condition for allowance (MPEP § 1302.04).
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 2.7% of allowed cases (in the 72% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.