Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18780334 | Machine Learning-Based Universal Software Component Identification | July 2024 | October 2024 | Allow | 3 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18648583 | NESTED LOOP CONTROL | April 2024 | February 2025 | Allow | 10 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18641166 | FACILITATING UPDATES TO DATA PIPELINES USING MODULARLY-GENERATED PLATFORM-AGNOSTIC DATA PIPELINE PORTIONS SYSTEMS AND METHODS | April 2024 | August 2024 | Allow | 3 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18418074 | CONFIGURATION PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT FOR SOFTWARE | January 2024 | January 2025 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18400756 | DIGITAL PROCESSING SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FACILITATING THE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF APPLICATIONS IN CONJUNCTION WITH A SERVERLESS ENVIRONMENT | December 2023 | June 2024 | Allow | 5 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18534678 | ROBUST OVER THE AIR REPROGRAMMING | December 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 8 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18522526 | FIRMWARE COMPONENT WITH SELF-DESCRIPTIVE DEPENDENCY INFORMATION | November 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18512518 | AUTOMATIC CODE GENERATION OF OPTIMIZED RTL VIA REDUNDANT CODE REMOVAL | November 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18497854 | GENERATING A PLATFORM-AGNOSTIC DATA PIPELINE VIA A LOW CODE TRANSFORMATION LAYER SYSTEMS AND METHODS | October 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 10 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18379266 | SYSTEM FOR RECONFIGURING A LEGACY APPLICATION CODE AND A METHOD THEREOF | October 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18480461 | CONTROL METHOD OF AN INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM | October 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18369347 | REMOVING REDUNDANT CODE | September 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18466089 | SIGNED SWI CONTAINING SIGNED EXTENSIONS FOR DYNAMIC INSTALLATION | September 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18461558 | SHRINKING FILES BASED ON FUNCTION ANALYSIS | September 2023 | July 2024 | Allow | 10 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18547873 | PROGRAM ANALYZING APPARATUS, PROGRAM ANALYZING METHOD, AND TRACE PROCESSING ADDITION APPARATUS | August 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18236357 | DEPLOYING IMMUTABLE IMAGE SOFTWARE ONTO BRANCH RETAIL DEVICES | August 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18366029 | Method and System for Generating Desired States for Edge Sites | August 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18360091 | Determining Correct Base Images for Custom Images | July 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18360162 | OBTAINING SOFTWARE UPDATES FROM NEIGHBORING HOSTS IN A VIRTUALIZED COMPUTING SYSTEM | July 2023 | July 2024 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18359843 | GENERATING A PLATFORM-AGNOSTIC DATA PIPELINE VIA A LOW CODE TRANSFORMATION LAYER SYSTEMS AND METHODS | July 2023 | October 2023 | Allow | 2 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18221488 | ENHANCED CLOUD-COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT DEPLOYMENT | July 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18217475 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING UNTOUCHED SOURCE CODE SEGMENTS OF OPERATING SYSTEMS USING HARDWARE ASSISTANCE | June 2023 | December 2024 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18215564 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTAINER IMAGE UPGRADE | June 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18338023 | Shared Compilation Cache Verification System | June 2023 | May 2024 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18209228 | INTELLIGENT DIGITAL ASSISTANT FOR SOFTWARE TESTING AUTOMATION | June 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18204437 | REFINING SOFTWARE PACKAGE INSTALLATION PROCESSES USING CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT FILES | June 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18204675 | DEFINING AND EXECUTING A SECTION OF CODE FOR AN INTERPRETED SOFTWARE LANGUAGE | June 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18326886 | Securing Serverless Computing Workloads in a Cold Start | May 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18320190 | DYNAMIC PARTITION CUSTOMIZATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND DEVICE | May 2023 | December 2024 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18314523 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR USING CACHED BUILDS IN SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT | May 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18308228 | TECHNIQUES FOR TEST AUTOMATION PORTALS FOR BEHAVIOR-DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT | April 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18307257 | ATTESTATION OF OPERATIONS BY TOOL CHAINS | April 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18139234 | CONSIDERING DIFFERENCES OF SOFTWARE IMAGES DURING SOFTWARE IMAGE DISTRIBUTION USING PATCHES | April 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18136202 | Creating and Using Native Virtual Probes in Computing Environments | April 2023 | February 2024 | Allow | 10 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18296288 | NEGATIVE NUMBERING TO LOG WEB SERVICE UPDATE ATTEMPTS | April 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18129288 | CODE PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION BASED ON AN INFORMATION-ENHANCED DIFFUSION MODEL | March 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18124543 | GENERATING A PLATFORM-AGNOSTIC DATA PIPELINE VIA A LOW CODE TRANSFORMATION LAYER SYSTEMS AND METHODS | March 2023 | June 2023 | Allow | 3 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18123689 | DOCUMENTATION ENFORCEMENT DURING COMPILATION | March 2023 | April 2024 | Allow | 13 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18171094 | SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT | February 2023 | February 2024 | Allow | 12 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18111423 | INCREMENTAL STACK WALKING | February 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18110412 | AUTONOMOUS RELEASE MANAGEMENT IN DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING SYSTEMS | February 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 19 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18164389 | Client Application with Embedded Server | February 2023 | April 2024 | Allow | 15 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18103010 | CONFIGURATION PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT FOR SOFTWARE | January 2023 | September 2023 | Allow | 8 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18150579 | CONFIGURING AN INSTALLATION OF A SOFTWARE PROGRAM USING A MODEL TRAINED BASED ON INFORMATION FROM A CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | January 2023 | December 2024 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18092519 | NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING ENGINE FOR AUTOMATED DETECTION OF SOURCE CODE DISCREPANCIES | January 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18089413 | Methodology for constructing statically reconfigurable soft-processor cores for hardware acceleration of algorithms | December 2022 | July 2024 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18064620 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING CODE DUPLICATION IN CODEBASES | December 2022 | July 2024 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18077109 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR TRACKING MEMORY USAGE | December 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18075174 | TESTING SOFTWARE CHANGES AND DETERMINING A REPEATABILITY OF SOFTWARE TESTS | December 2022 | April 2024 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18074994 | CODE REVIEW COMMENT GENERATION VIA RETRIEVAL-AUGMENTED TRANSFORMER WITH CHUNK CROSS- ATTENTION | December 2022 | August 2024 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18073859 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF OFFLOADING AND MIGRATING MANAGEMENT CONTROLLER FUNCTIONALITIES USING CONTAINERIZED SERVICES AND APPLICATION THEREOF | December 2022 | May 2024 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18070730 | DYNAMIC AUTOMATION OF PREREQUISITE COMPONENT DEPLOYMENT IN DISCONNECTED ENVIRONMENTS | November 2022 | March 2024 | Allow | 15 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 18058035 | LAZY EVALUATION OF SUPPLY CHAIN POLICY BASED ON TRANSPARENCY LOG ATTESTATIONS | November 2022 | March 2024 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17970821 | INFORMATION HANDLING SYSTEM WITH A DYNAMIC BASIC INPUT/OUTPUT SYSTEM CONFIGURATION MAP | October 2022 | July 2024 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18048734 | SHRINKING EXECUTABLE FILES BASED ON FUNCTION ANALYSIS | October 2022 | June 2023 | Allow | 7 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18046181 | CHECK DEPENDENCY AND SETUP WITH METAPROGRAMMING FOR LOW-CODE AND NO-CODE DEVELOPMENT | October 2022 | August 2024 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17935645 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SUPPORTING NVMe SSD REBOOTLESS FIRMWARE UPDATES | September 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17951928 | SMART IMAGE REGISTRIES FOR DYNAMIC IMAGE GENERATION | September 2022 | May 2024 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17947064 | AUTOMATING INTERACTIONS FOR HEALTH DATA COLLECTION AND PATIENT ENGAGEMENT | September 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17942239 | NESTED LOOP CONTROL | September 2022 | December 2023 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17900237 | DERIVING A CONTAINER FROM A PACKAGE SET | August 2022 | May 2024 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17900210 | SOFTWARE TOOL INTEGRATION | August 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 28 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17898013 | VIRTUAL RESTRUCTURING FOR PATCHING COMPRESSED DISK IMAGES | August 2022 | November 2023 | Allow | 14 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17892754 | Incremental Image Import Process for Supporting Multiple Upstream Image Repositories | August 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17882697 | ON-DEMAND DECENTRALIZED COLLECTION OF CLINICAL DATA FROM DIGITAL DEVICES OF REMOTE PATIENTS | August 2022 | October 2023 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17880388 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DYNAMIC DEAD CODE ANALYSIS | August 2022 | September 2023 | Allow | 13 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17869848 | REVOKED FIRMWARE ROLLBACK PREVENTION | July 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 34 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17861351 | Creating and Using Native Virtual Probes in Computing Environments | July 2022 | January 2023 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17854441 | METHOD FOR MANAGING SOFTWARE VERSIONS OF ELECTRONIC DEVICE(S) IN A VEHICLE AND RELATED DEVICE | June 2022 | May 2024 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17851923 | AUTOMATED CONTAINER SIZE REDUCTION | June 2022 | January 2024 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17851649 | GENERATOR AND METHOD FOR GENERATING SECOND PROCESSING OPERATIONS, AND SERVICE PROVISION DEVICE USING SAME | June 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17836581 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ARRAY STRUCTURE PROCESSING | June 2022 | April 2023 | Allow | 11 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17835121 | MACHINE LEARNING MODEL REPRESENTATION AND EXECUTION | June 2022 | December 2022 | Allow | 6 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17745527 | METHOD AND MECHANISM FOR OPERATING SYSTEM IMAGE INSTALLATION BASED ON DECOUPLED ARCHITECTURE | May 2022 | March 2024 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17744504 | VALIDATION OF DESIRED SOFTWARE STATE IMAGE FOR HARDWARE INCOMPATIBILITIES | May 2022 | January 2023 | Allow | 9 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17740828 | COMPILER-INITIATED TILE REPLACEMENT TO ENABLE HARDWARE ACCELERATION RESOURCES | May 2022 | August 2023 | Allow | 15 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17774523 | Method and System for Running an Identity and Access Management System | May 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17729297 | OVER-THE-AIR (OTA) MASTER, CENTER, SYSTEM, METHOD, NON-TRANSITORY STORAGE MEDIUM, AND VEHICLE | April 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 34 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17725421 | DESIRED STATE MODEL FOR MANAGING LIFECYCLE OF VIRTUALIZATION SOFTWARE | April 2022 | January 2023 | Allow | 9 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17722496 | MOBILE AS A BANKING GATEWAY FOR SMART APPLIANCES WITH FUTURE NETWORKS | April 2022 | December 2023 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17703758 | USING CLUSTERS TO CREATE TEST INSTANCES | March 2022 | April 2024 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17696687 | ROBUST OVER THE AIR REPROGRAMMING | March 2022 | September 2023 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17695895 | CONTROL AND RECONFIGURATION OF DATA FLOW GRAPHS ON HETEROGENEOUS COMPUTING PLATFORM | March 2022 | February 2023 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17652808 | UPDATE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD | February 2022 | January 2024 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17679547 | CENTER, UPDATE MANAGEMENT METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY STORAGE MEDIUM | February 2022 | November 2023 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17677539 | PROGRAM UPDATE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, MOVING BODY FAULT DIAGNOSIS DEVICE, AND PROGRAM UPDATE MANAGEMENT METHOD | February 2022 | August 2024 | Abandon | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17672063 | AUTOMATED UPDATES TO CODE DEPLOYMENT PIPELINES | February 2022 | July 2023 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17671482 | APPLICATION RENDERING PLATFORM | February 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17650536 | MITIGATING INFORMATION HANDLING SYSTEM (IHS) STARTUP LATENCY IN HOTELING ENVIRONMENTS DUE TO DRIVER AND FIRMWARE UPDATES | February 2022 | March 2024 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17665632 | OBTAINING SOFTWARE UPDATES FROM NEIGHBORING HOSTS IN A VIRTUALIZED COMPUTING SYSTEM | February 2022 | April 2023 | Allow | 14 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17587845 | ENHANCED CLOUD-COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT DEPLOYMENT | January 2022 | February 2023 | Allow | 13 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17581404 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ANALYZING FIRST PARTY DATA FROM ONE OR MORE SOFTWARE TOOLS | January 2022 | June 2023 | Allow | 17 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17581570 | SPARSE PROGRAMMING IMAGE VALIDATION | January 2022 | October 2024 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17648516 | SYSTEM AND METHOD TO COMPARE MODULES FOR THE COMMON CODE, REMOVE THE REDUNDANCY AND RUN THE UNIQUE WORKFLOWS | January 2022 | October 2023 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17579480 | TAGGING PACKAGES IN AN APPLICATION ECOSYSTEM | January 2022 | April 2023 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17576407 | DECOUPLING LOOP DEPENDENCIES USING BUFFERS TO ENABLE PIPELINING OF LOOPS | January 2022 | March 2023 | Allow | 14 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17575513 | DATA MODEL FOR A CLOUD APPLICATION DEPLOYMENT SERVICE | January 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 41 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17570353 | CONTROL SYSTEM, MOBILE OBJECT, CONTROL METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM | January 2022 | March 2024 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17563598 | MODEL DRIVEN STATE MACHINE TRANSITIONS TO CONFIGURE AN INSTALLATION OF A SOFTWARE PROGRAM | December 2021 | October 2022 | Allow | 9 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17554485 | Shared Compilation Cache Verification System | December 2021 | March 2023 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner LEE, MARINA.
With a 20.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is below the USPTO average, indicating that appeals face more challenges here than typical.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 51.7% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner LEE, MARINA works in Art Unit 2192 and has examined 576 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 89.2%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 22 months.
Examiner LEE, MARINA's allowance rate of 89.2% places them in the 68% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by LEE, MARINA receive 1.55 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 39% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by LEE, MARINA is 22 months. This places the examiner in the 79% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +8.9% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by LEE, MARINA. This interview benefit is in the 43% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 34.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 72% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 40.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 53% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 111.1% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 78% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. Before filing a full appeal brief, strongly consider requesting a PAC. The PAC provides an opportunity for the examiner and supervisory personnel to reconsider the rejection before the case proceeds to the PTAB.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 81.5% of appeals filed. This is in the 71% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 27.3% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 42.4% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 44% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 4.3% of allowed cases (in the 88% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 8.9% of allowed cases (in the 87% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.