Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19070470 | METHOD FOR MATCHING GUIDE VANE AND OUTLET PASSAGE OF LOW-LIFT PUMP STATION | March 2025 | December 2025 | Abandon | 9 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 19021366 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PRECISELY DESIGNING INTEGRATED DIE-CASTING STRUCTURES | January 2025 | February 2026 | Abandon | 13 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18545014 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TOPOLOGY AND SHAPE OPTIMIZATION FOR MODELING OF A PHYSICAL OBJECT | December 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18184363 | PRODUCT DISPLAY DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING USING A PRODUCT DISPLAY DESIGN MODEL | March 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 29 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17617674 | METHOD FOR DETERMINING A PREDICTIVE MODEL OF A PRESSURE RATIO FOR A DUAL-FLOW TURBINE ENGINE | December 2021 | September 2025 | Allow | 46 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17543287 | Generating Values For Property Parameters | December 2021 | January 2026 | Abandon | 50 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17610159 | METHOD FOR ENGINE PERFORMANCE DEGRADATION PREDICTION BASED ON THE EC-RBELM ALGORITHM | November 2021 | March 2026 | Abandon | 52 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17610071 | METHOD FOR MODELLING THE FORMATION OF A SEDIMENTARY AREA BY SIMULATING TIDAL CURRENT-INDUCED PARTICLE TRANSPORT | November 2021 | September 2025 | Allow | 47 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17506847 | COMMON FRAMEWORK FOR SENSOR AND COMMUNICATION MODELS | October 2021 | September 2025 | Allow | 47 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17593612 | METHOD FOR DESIGNING AND VALIDATING THE SHAPE AND POSITIONING OF A CANNULA FOR A PATIENT BY SIMULATING THE INSERTION INTO THE TRACHEA | September 2021 | February 2026 | Allow | 53 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17307849 | REALISTIC PLANT GROWTH MODELING | May 2021 | September 2025 | Allow | 53 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17237630 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SYNCHRONIZATION OF ASYNCHRONOUS DATASETS | April 2021 | November 2025 | Allow | 55 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner DEBNATH, NUPUR works in Art Unit 2186 and has examined 8 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 75.0%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 52 months.
Examiner DEBNATH, NUPUR's allowance rate of 75.0% places them in the 40% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by DEBNATH, NUPUR receive 2.12 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 57% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by DEBNATH, NUPUR is 52 months. This places the examiner in the 3% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +50.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by DEBNATH, NUPUR. This interview benefit is in the 93% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 37.5% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 85% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 33.3% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 49% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 13% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 15% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.