Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18632825 | METHOD FOR EDITING TEXT INFORMATION | April 2024 | October 2024 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18537465 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TEXT-TO-TEXT TRANSFORMATION OF QUALITATIVE RESPONSES | December 2023 | May 2024 | Allow | 5 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18373450 | TEXT FORMATTER | September 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18453772 | FRAMEWORK AGNOSTIC SUMMARIZATION OF MULTI-CHANNEL COMMUNICATION | August 2023 | April 2024 | Allow | 7 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18351328 | AN ELECTRONIC DEVICE WITH USER INTERFACING FOR DISPLAYING AND SELECTING IoT DEVICE(S) AND FOR DISPLAYING AND SELECTING CAPABILITIES OF EACH SELECTED IoT DEVICE | July 2023 | December 2024 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18209439 | TRANSACTION ENTITY PREDICTION WITH A GLOBAL LIST | June 2023 | January 2024 | Allow | 7 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18328330 | OBJECT LEVEL SELECTIVE UNDO IN DIGITAL GRAPHIC DESIGN DOCUMENTS | June 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18326592 | CALL DISPLAY METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | May 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 15 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18326250 | MESSAGE CONTENT REDUCTION USING MESSAGE TEMPLATES | May 2023 | April 2024 | Allow | 10 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18037889 | GENERATING HEADING BASED ON EXTRACTED FEATURE WORDS | May 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18032283 | APPARATUS FOR GENERATING DRAFT DOCUMENT AND METHOD THEREFOR | April 2023 | July 2024 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18301101 | WORKFLOW STYLE GOVERNANCE | April 2023 | June 2024 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18131996 | TECHNOLOGY FOR MANAGING GRAPHIC DESIGN USING METADATA RELATIONSHIPS | April 2023 | December 2024 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18124304 | WEIGHTED SCROLL FOR DISPLAY OF HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURES | March 2023 | May 2024 | Allow | 14 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18184852 | TRANSFORMING CONTENT TO SUPPORT NEURODIVERGENT COMPREHENSION OF THE CONTENT | March 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 22 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18043296 | Screen Projection Method and Apparatus, and Project End | February 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18174314 | CHARACTER INPUT DEVICE, CHARACTER INPUT METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM STORING A CHARACTER INPUT PROGRAM | February 2023 | July 2024 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18103543 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FACILITATING NAVIGATION IN SPACE | January 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18103551 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF PREVENTING USER INTERFACE (UI) FLICKERING | January 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 20 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18007193 | WEB PAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS AND METHOD USING BLOCK INFORMATION WITHIN WEB PAGE | January 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18054511 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MULTI-MODAL CONVERSATION SUMMARIZATION ON A CONVERSATION PLATFORM | November 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17945718 | Avatar Carrier Generating System for Metaverse and Method Thereof | September 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17874256 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CREATING A CURATED LIST OF IMPORTANT OR ACTIONABLE ITEMS FROM RECEIVED, DIGITIZED HANDWRITTEN SYMBOLS AND TEXT | July 2022 | March 2024 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17757827 | KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR PERFORMANCE REPORT APPARATUS AND METHOD | June 2022 | December 2024 | Abandon | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17749837 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR QUERY-FOCUSED SUMMARIZATION | May 2022 | March 2024 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 17746484 | TARGET-BASED SCHEMA IDENTIFICATION AND SEMANTIC MAPPING FOR ROBOTIC PROCESS AUTOMATION | May 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 28 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17531479 | METHOD OF COMPUTERIZED PRESENTATION OF A LEGEND OF OBJECT SYMBOLS ON A DOCUMENT | November 2021 | November 2024 | Allow | 36 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17504361 | AUTONOMOUS DETECTION OF COMPOUND ISSUE REQUESTS IN AN ISSUE TRACKING SYSTEM | October 2021 | December 2023 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17370533 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR CONVERTING HANDWRITING TO TEXT AND METHOD THEREFOR | July 2021 | March 2024 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17352614 | Adaptive Column Selection | June 2021 | July 2024 | Abandon | 37 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17146133 | AUTOMATIC DOCUMENT SKETCHING | January 2021 | December 2024 | Allow | 47 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17128468 | ENHANCEMENT AWARE TEXT TRANSITION | December 2020 | December 2024 | Abandon | 48 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16695115 | Emoji to Select How or Where Sound Will Localize to a Listener | November 2019 | June 2024 | Abandon | 54 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15581921 | ALLOWING OPERATING SYSTEM ACCESS TO NON-STANDARD FONTS IN A NETWORK DOCUMENT | April 2017 | November 2017 | Allow | 7 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15582399 | ALLOWING OPERATING SYSTEM ACCESS TO NON-STANDARD FONTS IN A NETWORK DOCUMENT | April 2017 | August 2018 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15421270 | PROVISION OF ALTERNATIVE TEXT FOR USE IN ASSOCIATION WITH IMAGE DATA | January 2017 | June 2019 | Allow | 29 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15341698 | DETERMINING AND ASSISTING WITH DOCUMENT OR DESIGN CODE COMPLETENESS | November 2016 | April 2019 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15337983 | SUMMARIZATION AND PROCESSING OF EMAIL ON A CLIENT COMPUTING DEVICE BASED ON CONTENT CONTRIBUTION TO AN EMAIL THREAD USING WEIGHTING TECHNIQUES | October 2016 | May 2018 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15197389 | APPARATUS OF A HAND-HELD DEVICE FOR EXPOSING NON-STANDARD FONTS IN A NETWORK DOCUMENT TO AN OPERATING SYSTEM | June 2016 | September 2017 | Allow | 15 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15159939 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM | May 2016 | March 2018 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 14980363 | Accessing Related Application States From A Current Application State | December 2015 | February 2018 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14634444 | AUTOMATED PAGE GENERATION USING VALUE-BASED RECOMMENDATIONS | February 2015 | August 2017 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14537435 | APPROACHES FOR CONTROLLING A COMPUTING DEVICE BASED ON HEAD MOVEMENT | November 2014 | February 2017 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14535544 | DETECTING INFLUENCE CAUSED BY CHANGING THE SOURCE CODE OF AN APPLICATION FROM WHICH A DOCUMENT OBJECT MODEL TREE AND CASCADING STYLE SHEET MAY BE EXTRACTED | November 2014 | July 2016 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 14399337 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DOCUMENT FORMAT CONVERSION | November 2014 | September 2016 | Allow | 22 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14497179 | GENERATING CUSTOM MARKUP CONTENT TO DETER ROBOTS | September 2014 | September 2018 | Allow | 48 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13936163 | PROVISION OF ALTERNATIVE TEXT FOR USE IN ASSOCIATION WITH IMAGE DATA | July 2013 | October 2016 | Allow | 39 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13935514 | INTERACTIVE SITEMAP WITH USER FOOTPRINTS | July 2013 | March 2017 | Allow | 44 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13934891 | ENHANCED KEYWORD FIND OPERATION IN A WEB PAGE | July 2013 | April 2016 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13789161 | AUTONOMIC GENERATION OF DOCUMENT STRUCTURE IN A CONTENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | March 2013 | June 2015 | Allow | 27 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 13297500 | System and Method for Using Pre-Defined Character Ranges to Denote Document Features | November 2011 | September 2015 | Allow | 46 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12870817 | Detecting plagiarism in computer markup language files | August 2010 | February 2015 | Allow | 53 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12870456 | TECHNIQUES FOR CONTENT SERVICES | August 2010 | May 2015 | Allow | 57 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 12869449 | INFORMATION DISPLAY APPARATUS AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM | August 2010 | September 2015 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12854052 | DOMAIN BASED WORKFLOWS | August 2010 | September 2015 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12730209 | PROVIDING TAGGING ASSISTANCE AND COMPLIANCE REVIEW IN CONNECTION WITH STANDARDIZED DOCUMENTS | March 2010 | December 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12199546 | DOCUMENT CONVERSION APPARATUS AND DOCUMENT CONVERSION METHOD | August 2008 | April 2015 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 11942583 | METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR PUBLICATION OF UNCONSCIOUSLY CAPTURED DOCUMENTS | November 2007 | April 2015 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11864836 | VISUALIZING CHANGES TO CONTENT OVER TIME | September 2007 | May 2015 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11844787 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ANNOTATION OF DATA VISUALIZATIONS | August 2007 | January 2015 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11838610 | Differential Dynamic Content Delivery With Text Display In Dependence Upon Sound Level | August 2007 | October 2014 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11562973 | Method, System and Apparatus for Using User Profile Electronic Device Data In Media Delivery | November 2006 | October 2014 | Allow | 60 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner TAPP, AMELIA L works in Art Unit 2179 and has examined 36 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 88.9%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 39 months.
Examiner TAPP, AMELIA L's allowance rate of 88.9% places them in the 70% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by TAPP, AMELIA L receive 2.28 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 64% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by TAPP, AMELIA L is 39 months. This places the examiner in the 26% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a -1.5% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by TAPP, AMELIA L. This interview benefit is in the 9% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 28.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 53% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 38.1% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 58% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 90.9% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 88% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 12% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 6.2% of allowed cases (in the 83% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.