Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18641135 | OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SURGERY MICROSURGERY INSTRUMENTS AND METHODS OF USE FOR INCREASING SURGICAL PRECISION AND REDUCING VITREORETINAL INSTRUMENT INSERTIONS AND REMOVALS AND RELATED TRAUMA | April 2024 | June 2025 | Abandon | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18434266 | HYDROPNEUMATIC ISOTHERMAL COMPRESSED AIR ENERGY STORAGE | February 2024 | June 2025 | Abandon | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18429157 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTION OF OCULAR STRUCTURES | January 2024 | June 2025 | Abandon | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18428802 | System And Method For Diagnostic Coding | January 2024 | June 2025 | Abandon | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18543495 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF FACILITATING PUBLISHING AND VERIFICATION OF DIGITAL DOCUMENTS ON A DISTRIBUTED LEDGER | December 2023 | June 2025 | Abandon | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18502852 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PERFORMING ACCELERATED MOLECULAR DYNAMICS COMPUTER SIMULATIONS WITH UNCERTAINTY-AWARE NEURAL NETWORK | November 2023 | June 2025 | Abandon | 19 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18496845 | CRISPR-based DNA Repair-Inhibiting Intratumoral Cancer Therapy | October 2023 | June 2025 | Abandon | 19 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18467761 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ONBOARDING A MERCHANT ON A COMPUTING PLATFORM | September 2023 | June 2025 | Abandon | 21 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18454643 | LITHIUM IRON PHOSPHATE (LFP) CATHODE ACTIVE MATERIALS AND METHOD FOR DEPOSITION OF THE SAME | August 2023 | June 2025 | Abandon | 21 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18219192 | Method and Apparatus of An Automated Safety Response System in a Self-organizing, multi-networked cooperative NvisiLink Mesh with Echo Positioning | July 2023 | June 2025 | Abandon | 23 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18333527 | WATER SQUIRTING BRUSH | June 2023 | June 2025 | Abandon | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18331912 | EXERCISE EQUIPMENT FOR TRANSPORTATION OF ARTICLE OF FOOTWEAR | June 2023 | June 2025 | Abandon | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18037898 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR SEPARATION AND SELECTION OF MOLECULES IN A GAS MIXTURE | May 2023 | June 2025 | Abandon | 25 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18120998 | ENGINEERED SELF-HEALING HYDRAULIC-CEMENT CONCRETE BY BIOMIMICRY | March 2023 | May 2025 | Abandon | 26 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18102092 | Food Decorating Stencil | January 2023 | June 2025 | Abandon | 28 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17967288 | MULTI-WHEEL WHEEL BARROW DEVICE FOR MANEUVERING A STAIR ASSEMBLY | October 2022 | June 2025 | Abandon | 32 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17884569 | SPACE-BORNE IMAGING SYSTEM | August 2022 | June 2025 | Abandon | 34 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17633208 | Phosphorous-Nitrogen Alternative to PFC Foam | February 2022 | June 2025 | Abandon | 40 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17494632 | Early Detection of Cancer, Recurrence Monitoring and Companion Diagnostics via Liquid Biopsy | October 2021 | June 2025 | Abandon | 44 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17460219 | Plant-Based Cleaning Scrubber | August 2021 | February 2025 | Abandon | 42 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17300574 | Inflatable Non-Imaging concentrator photonic crystal solar spectrum splitter perovskite integrated circuit concentrating photovoltaic system | August 2021 | June 2025 | Abandon | 46 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17068705 | RETRACTABLE CAULKING CAP | October 2020 | March 2022 | Abandon | 17 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 16873878 | Inflatable non-imaging non-tracking solar concentrator based concentrating photovoltaic system powered airship | August 2020 | June 2025 | Abandon | 58 | 7 | 0 | No | No |
| 16548842 | MODULAR ORTHODONTIC DEVICES AND METHODS FOR TREATMENT | August 2019 | June 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 3 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16873659 | Mobile scheduling system | December 2018 | June 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner PULLIAM, CHRISTYANN R works in Art Unit 2178 and has examined 21 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 0.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 26 months.
Examiner PULLIAM, CHRISTYANN R's allowance rate of 0.0% places them in the 0% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by PULLIAM, CHRISTYANN R receive 1.14 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 18% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by PULLIAM, CHRISTYANN R is 26 months. This places the examiner in the 60% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by PULLIAM, CHRISTYANN R. This interview benefit is in the 10% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 0.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 0% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 0% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 26.4% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 17% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 11% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.