Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18430828 | Audio Passback | February 2024 | June 2024 | Allow | 5 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18197623 | COLLABORATION SYSTEM INCLUDING A SPATIAL EVENT MAP | May 2023 | April 2024 | Allow | 11 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18143722 | Adding Audio Content to Digital Works | May 2023 | December 2023 | Allow | 7 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17962353 | PORTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICE, METHOD, AND GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE FOR DISPLAYING ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS AND LISTS | October 2022 | December 2023 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17948096 | Devices, Methods, and Graphical User Interfaces for Interacting with Three-Dimensional Environments | September 2022 | June 2024 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17911330 | VIDEO DISPLAY DEVICE, VIDEO DISPLAY SYSTEM, VIDEO DISPLAY METHOD, AND PROGRAM | September 2022 | June 2024 | Abandon | 21 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17941330 | CONCURRENT CHANNELS OF COMMUNICATION | September 2022 | March 2024 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17820437 | TEXT-GUIDED STICKER GENERATION | August 2022 | June 2024 | Allow | 22 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17819820 | MOVING APPLICATIONS ON MULTI-SCREEN COMPUTING DEVICE | August 2022 | March 2024 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17882487 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR ADDING EMOJI, APPARATUS AND STORAGE MEDIUM | August 2022 | April 2024 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17727176 | METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING MESSAGE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE THEREOF | April 2022 | October 2023 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17698536 | VOLUME ADJUSTMENT METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | March 2022 | June 2024 | Abandon | 27 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17650892 | DISPLAY CONTROL SYSTEM, DISPLAY METHOD, AND PROGRAM | February 2022 | April 2024 | Allow | 26 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17646411 | REAL-TIME COMMUNICATION INTERFACE WITH HAPTIC AND AUDIO FEEDBACK RESPONSE | December 2021 | December 2023 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17559459 | Device, Method, and Graphical User Interface for Presenting Representations of Media Containers | December 2021 | March 2024 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17557617 | NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM | December 2021 | January 2024 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17455218 | APPARATUS, METHOD AND STORAGE MEDIUM | November 2021 | January 2024 | Allow | 26 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17523440 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING A DYNAMIC LOOP OF CONTENT FOR DISPLAY | November 2021 | December 2023 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17232375 | HEAD TRACKING WITH VIRTUAL AVIONICS TRAINING PRODUCTS | April 2021 | August 2024 | Allow | 40 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17076617 | IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD FOR CONTROLLING IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | October 2020 | June 2024 | Allow | 44 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 17044396 | DATA REDUCTION APPARATUS, DATA REDUCTION METHOD, AND COMPUTER- READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM | October 2020 | September 2024 | Abandon | 47 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner TSAI, JAMES T works in Art Unit 2177 and has examined 8 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 87.5%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 27 months.
Examiner TSAI, JAMES T's allowance rate of 87.5% places them in the 67% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by TSAI, JAMES T receive 2.62 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 77% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by TSAI, JAMES T is 27 months. This places the examiner in the 71% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +50.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by TSAI, JAMES T. This interview benefit is in the 93% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 35.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 78% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 2% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 12% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 14% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.