USPTO Examiner SAMPATH GAYATHRI - Art Unit 2176

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18601081VOLTAGE REGULATOR FOR COMPUTING DEVICEMarch 2024September 2024Allow700YesNo
18544096EFFICIENT SYSTEM ON CHIP POWER DELIVERY WITH ADAPTIVE VOLTAGE HEADROOM CONTROLDecember 2023November 2024Allow1110YesNo
18494606SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REDUCING POWER CONSUMPTION BY MONITORING NETWORK TRAFFICOctober 2023June 2025Allow2010NoNo
18492010POWER MANAGEMENT CIRCUIT, CHIP AND UPGRADE METHOD THEREFOR, AND SERVEROctober 2023March 2025Allow1610YesNo
18256106POWER CAPACITY PLANNING FOR A COMPUTING SYSTEMJune 2023June 2025Allow2520NoNo
18191705SYSTEMS AND METHODS PROVIDING SEAMLESS ACCESSIBILITY ACROSS PRE-BOOT AND RUNTIME ENVIRONMENTSMarch 2023March 2025Allow2300YesNo
18027421POWER SUPPLY CIRCUIT, CHIP, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICEMarch 2023March 2025Allow2410NoNo
18115896Network Chip Management Method and Apparatus, Communication Device, and Storage MediumMarch 2023June 2025Allow2820NoNo
18167263SERVER DEVICE CAPABLE OF BEING STABLY OPERATED IN SPITE OF POWER LOSS AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAMEFebruary 2023April 2025Allow2610YesNo
18163251DATA MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR CLOUD REGIONSFebruary 2023June 2025Allow2810NoNo
18161927CLOCK SYNCHRONIZATION IN TIME-INTERLEAVED ANALOG-TO-DIGITAL CONVERSIONJanuary 2023April 2025Allow2610YesNo
18159022POWER REDUCTION FOR SYSTEMS HAVING MULTIPLE RANKS OF MEMORYJanuary 2023May 2025Allow2720YesNo
17918583INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM AND INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM CONTROL METHODOctober 2022October 2024Allow2410YesNo
17905229TECHNOLOGY TO AUTOMATICALLY CONDUCT SPEED SWITCHING IN PROCESSOR LINKS WITHOUT WARM RESETSAugust 2022February 2025Abandon3020YesNo
17855562APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR IMPROVING LATENCY OR POWER CONSUMPTIONJune 2022October 2024Allow2720YesNo
17620960CLOCK DISTRIBUTION METHOD AND APPARATUS IN NETWORKDecember 2021August 2024Allow3220YesNo
17530946ON-BOARD SYSTEM, ON-BOARD SYSTEM CONTROL METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY RECORDING MEDIUMNovember 2021February 2025Abandon3920NoNo
17517124ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND CONTROL METHODNovember 2021November 2024Allow3630YesNo
17491569SELECTIVE SWITCHING OF AN ACTIVE PARTITION IN AN ELECTRONIC DEVICEOctober 2021August 2024Allow3440YesNo
17472319METHOD, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEM FOR CALIBRATING A PROCESSOR POWER LEVEL ESTIMATESeptember 2021October 2024Allow3740YesNo
17390126MULTI-LEVEL POWER MANAGEMENT OPERATION FRAMEWORKJuly 2021August 2024Allow3750NoNo
17382239ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT POWER CONSUMPTION RATING FOR APPLICATIONSJuly 2021August 2024Allow3640YesNo
16183972ENHANCED SECURITY AND RESOURCE UTILIZATION IN A MULTI-OPERATING SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTNovember 2018January 2019Allow200YesNo
15060153ENHANCED SECURITY AND RESOURCE UTILIZATION IN A MULTI-OPERATING SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTMarch 2016August 2018Allow2910NoNo
14799370LOW POWER MODEJuly 2015October 2018Allow3940YesNo
14796039INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS HAVING POWER SAVING FUNCTION, CONTROL METHOD FOR INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, STORAGE MEDIUM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMJuly 2015November 2018Allow4150YesNo
13276718METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PERFORMING DATA SYNCHRONIZATION OF A SNAPSHOT IMAGE BY SELECTIVELY RELOADING DATA FROM NONVOLATILE TO VOLATILE MEMORY AFTER WAKEUP FROM HIBERNATIONOctober 2011April 2014Allow3020NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner SAMPATH, GAYATHRI - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner SAMPATH, GAYATHRI works in Art Unit 2176 and has examined 26 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 92.3%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 28 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner SAMPATH, GAYATHRI's allowance rate of 92.3% places them in the 78% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by SAMPATH, GAYATHRI receive 2.08 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 69% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SAMPATH, GAYATHRI is 28 months. This places the examiner in the 50% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +5.2% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by SAMPATH, GAYATHRI. This interview benefit is in the 30% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 26.9% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 35% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 50.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 70% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 11% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 12% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

    Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

    • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
    • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
    • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
    • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
    • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
    • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

    Important Disclaimer

    Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

    No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

    Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

    Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.