Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18958193 | SOFTWARE CONFIGURATION METHOD, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | November 2024 | June 2025 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18865128 | ARM SERVER AND STARTING METHOD AND APPARATUS THEREFOR, AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM | November 2024 | February 2025 | Allow | 3 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18915484 | OPTIMIZING CONFIGURATION RULES OVER MULTIPLE MANAGEMENT DOMAINS | October 2024 | January 2025 | Allow | 3 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18912357 | CONFIGURATION FILE GENERATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, MEDIUM AND PROGRAM PRODUCT | October 2024 | January 2025 | Allow | 3 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18674829 | System and Method for Generating and Sharing Pairs of Random Numbers | May 2024 | January 2025 | Allow | 8 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18651030 | Configuration of End User Devices | April 2024 | August 2024 | Allow | 3 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18623217 | INTEGRATED CIRCUITS (IC) CHIPS INCLUDING THROTTLE REQUEST ACCUMULATE CIRCUITS FOR CONTROLLING POWER CONSUMED IN PROCESSING CIRCUITS AND RELATED METHODS | April 2024 | February 2025 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18439593 | Clock Disciplining and Synchronizing | February 2024 | November 2024 | Allow | 9 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18437542 | Low-Power Wakeup Pattern Detection of Multiple Data Streams | February 2024 | January 2025 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18434332 | COMPUTERIZED SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MODIFIED HOST-CLIENT DEVICE CONFIGURATIONS AND CONNECTIONS | February 2024 | June 2025 | Allow | 17 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18432958 | CLOCK SYNCHRONIZATION APPARATUS AND METHOD, QUANTUM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL SYSTEM, AND QUANTUM COMPUTER | February 2024 | June 2025 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18432059 | SYNCHRONIZATION SIGNAL GENERATION CIRCUIT AND SYNCHRONIZATION METHOD BETWEEN MULTIPLE DEVICES | February 2024 | June 2025 | Allow | 17 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18432977 | MICROCONTROLLER AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE SAME | February 2024 | June 2025 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18525443 | MAPPING HARDWARE COMPONENTS TO A SERIES OF CALCULATIONS | November 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 17 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18510372 | DYNAMIC PRECISION TIME MESSAGE RATE SUPPORT | November 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 17 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18505270 | USER-CONFIGURABLE PERSON DETECTION SYSTEM, METHOD AND APPARATUS | November 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 10 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18495150 | SECURE TIME SYNCHRONIZATION WITH AN EDGE ORCHESTRATOR | October 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 17 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18492673 | SCALABLE SPECIFICATION AND SELF-GOVERNANCE FOR AUTONOMOUS DATABASES, CLUSTER DATABASES AND MULTI-TENANT DATABASES IN CLOUD AND ON-PREM ENVIRONMENT | October 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18379055 | OPTIMIZING CONTAINER STARTUP PERFORMANCE USING BLOCK LAYER STORAGE | October 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 17 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18475616 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EXECUTION IN DYNAMIC APPLICATION RUNTIME ENVIRONMENTS | September 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18473591 | Timebase Synchronization Using Pulsed Signal Injection | September 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18455816 | CHARACTERIZATION AND USE OF HARDWARE BUNDLES | August 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18218864 | Low Power Optimization Based Upon Host Exit Latency | July 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18339447 | INTEGRATED CIRCUITS (IC) CHIPS INCLUDING THROTTLE REQUEST ACCUMULATE CIRCUITS FOR CONTROLLING POWER CONSUMED IN PROCESSING CIRCUITS AND RELATED METHODS | June 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18338027 | TIME SYNCHRONIZED SENSOR DATA FOR ROBOTICS SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS | June 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18209558 | METHOD FOR PROGRAMMING AN FPGA | June 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18205829 | SECURE BOOTING SYSTEM AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOF | June 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18323743 | SYSTEMS AND METHOD FOR FLEXIBLE ACCESS OF A REGULATED SYSTEM | May 2023 | December 2024 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18315435 | ELECTRONIC CARD | May 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18034560 | APPLICATION STARTING METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM | April 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18184107 | PROCESSOR CONTROL METHOD AND ASSOCIATED SYSTEM-ON-CHIP | March 2023 | December 2024 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18179018 | DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM AND DATA PROCESSING METHOD | March 2023 | December 2024 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18114470 | MULTI-LEVEL CONSOLE INTERFACE FOR COMPUTING DEVICES | February 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18099055 | METHOD OF CONTROLLING SPECIFIED FUNCTION AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE SUPPORTING SAME | January 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18097951 | SERVERLESS PROPERTY STORE | January 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17976268 | ASSOCIATING TAGS TO CONFIGURATION ITEMS FOR TAG-BASED CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT | October 2022 | October 2024 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17955384 | METHODS AND APPARATUS TO IMPLEMENT OFF-SCREEN INDICATION OF BATTERY CHARGE STATUS IN MOBILE PLATFORMS | September 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 23 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17952391 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR THE RECONFIGURATION OF LEGACY MACHINES USED IN MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENTS TO GENERATE REAL-TIME OPERATIONAL DATA FOR USE IN ANALYTICS PROCESSES | September 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 38 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17581298 | System and Method to Update System Recommended Settings for Corresponding Operating System Version | January 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17565651 | DECREASING APPARENT LOAD TIME FOR A FRONTEND APPLICATION WHEN REQUESTING A PAGE FROM A BACKEND APPLICATION OF A MULTIUSER COLLABORATION TOOL | December 2021 | February 2025 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17561662 | COMPARATIVE SESSIONS BENCHMARKING TOOL FOR CHARACTERIZING END USER EXPERIENCE IN DIFFERENTLY CONFIGURED ENTERPRISE COMPUTER SYSTEMS | December 2021 | August 2024 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17561651 | FAST SELF-REFRESH EXIT POWER STATE | December 2021 | February 2025 | Allow | 38 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17604885 | MAINTENANCE METHOD FOR ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM AND COMPUTER PROGRAM | October 2021 | December 2024 | Allow | 38 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17503556 | Context Driven User Interfaces For Storage Systems | October 2021 | July 2024 | Allow | 33 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17481734 | INTEGRATED CIRCUIT PACKAGE RECONFIGURATION MECHANISM | September 2021 | February 2025 | Abandon | 41 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17444763 | Extensible platform for orchestration of data with built-in scalability and clustering | August 2021 | September 2024 | Abandon | 38 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17421669 | VEHICLE VIRTUALIZATION SYSTEM, TERMINAL DEVICE, IN-VEHICLE DEVICE, VIRTUALIZATION METHOD, AND VIRTUALIZATION PROGRAM | July 2021 | May 2025 | Allow | 46 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17184516 | COMPACT, SYMMETRY-ADAPTED MAPPING BETWEEN FERMIONIC SYSTEMS AND QUANTUM COMPUTERS | February 2021 | April 2023 | Abandon | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17132058 | HETEROGENEOUS CLOCK MANAGEMENT SOLUTION | December 2020 | January 2025 | Allow | 49 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15788386 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM | October 2017 | September 2019 | Allow | 23 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15496809 | MULTI-PLATFORM FIRMWARE SUPPORT | April 2017 | May 2019 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15496744 | MULTI-PLATFORM FIRMWARE SUPPORT | April 2017 | November 2019 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15353875 | REBOOT SYSTEM AND REBOOT METHOD | November 2016 | April 2019 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15102691 | INFORMATION APPARATUS | June 2016 | August 2018 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15094367 | POWER SUPPLY UNIT (PSU) SWITCHING | April 2016 | January 2019 | Allow | 34 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 14992308 | Method for Fair Off-Loading of Computational Tasks for Efficient Energy Management in Mobile Devices like Smart Phones | January 2016 | June 2019 | Allow | 41 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 14589530 | DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE SAME | January 2015 | September 2018 | Allow | 44 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner PANDEY, KESHAB R works in Art Unit 2176 and has examined 44 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 93.2%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 23 months.
Examiner PANDEY, KESHAB R's allowance rate of 93.2% places them in the 80% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by PANDEY, KESHAB R receive 1.18 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 19% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by PANDEY, KESHAB R is 23 months. This places the examiner in the 75% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a -21.4% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by PANDEY, KESHAB R. This interview benefit is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 45.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 96% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 30.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 35% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 142.9% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 99% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 11% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 12% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.