Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19130316 | SYSTEM, METHOD, APPARATUS AND DEVICE FOR MEASURING POWER CONSUMPTION OF SERVER, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | May 2025 | March 2026 | Allow | 10 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18853966 | Reset Using a Shared Reset Signal and a Retention Mechanism | October 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18845240 | A NOVEL CONTROL METHOD FOR SWITCHED-MODE POWER SUPPLIES | September 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18810237 | MULTI-NODE SERVER WITH POWER SCALING | August 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18633841 | SOC FAULT INDICATION STRATEGY TO THE MCU FOR THE ADAPTIVE PARTITIONS DURING BOOTUP STAGE | April 2024 | March 2026 | Abandon | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18628354 | DUAL PATH CLOCK FORWARDING | April 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18606632 | CONTROL METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | March 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18590635 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR UTILIZING EMBEDDED THERMAL SENSORS OF INFORMATION HANDLING RESOURCE TO MONITOR THERMAL CHANGE ON CIRCUIT BOARD | February 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18683957 | METHOD, ASSEMBLY-SUPPORT-UNIT AND ASSEMBLY ARRANGEMENT FOR AUTOMATION MACHINE-BASED EQUIPPING A SWITCHING CABINET OR SERVER RACK WITH PLACEMENT MODULES OR MAINTAINING PLACEMENT MODULES OF A SWITCHING CABINET OR SERVER RACK | February 2024 | January 2026 | Abandon | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18525695 | ESTABLISHING AN INTERNAL CLOCK VALUE OF AN INTERNET-OF-THINGS DEVICE BASED ON A TIMESTAMP RECEIVED FROM A SECURITY SERVICE VIA A SECURE CONNECTION | November 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18289460 | USER PRESENCE DETECTION KEYBOARD WITH CONFIGURABLE SLEEP MODE CONTROL | November 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18469807 | SECURE BOOT METHOD AND APPARATUS | September 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18271137 | METHOD FOR ASSIGNING ELECTRICAL SIGNALS IN A NETWORK | July 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18142728 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DYNAMICALLY FREEZING INFORMATION HANDLING SYSTEM PORTS TO MINIMIZE POWER CONSUMED BY IDLE PLUG AND PLAY DEVICES | May 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18137665 | POWER MANAGEMENT INTEGRATED CIRCUIT, ELECTRONIC DEVICE HAVING THE SAME, AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF | April 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18303403 | POWER CONSUMPTION MANAGEMENT THROUGH APPLYING OF A SYSTEM POWER CAP ON HETEROGENOUS SYSTEMS | April 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 30 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18157967 | KERNEL REBOOT METHOD | January 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17813127 | MANAGING A THERMAL POLICY OF AN INFORMATION HANDLING SYSTEM | July 2022 | December 2025 | Allow | 41 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17510545 | LOW POWER STANDBY MODE FOR MEMORY DEVICES | October 2021 | September 2025 | Allow | 47 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17482327 | SOFTWARE ENTITY POWER CONSUMPTION ESTIMATION AND MONITORING | September 2021 | February 2026 | Allow | 53 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner HUYNH, KIM NGOC works in Art Unit 2176 and has examined 2 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 53 months.
Examiner HUYNH, KIM NGOC's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 95% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by HUYNH, KIM NGOC receive 3.50 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 94% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by HUYNH, KIM NGOC is 53 months. This places the examiner in the 3% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by HUYNH, KIM NGOC. This interview benefit is in the 13% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 25.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 38% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 2% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 12% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 14% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.