Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18869446 | CONTROL RIGHT HANDOVER METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR POWER MANAGEMENT, DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | November 2024 | April 2025 | Allow | 4 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18866178 | OPTIMIZING ENCRYPTED COMPUTATION PARAMETERS | November 2024 | March 2025 | Allow | 4 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18909389 | BI-DIRECTIONAL ELECTRICAL MICROGRID OF NETWORKED PROCESSING-ON-DEMAND SYSTEMS | October 2024 | December 2024 | Allow | 2 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18654413 | BI-DIRECTIONAL ELECTRICAL MICROGRID OF NETWORKED GPU-ON-DEMAND SYSTEMS | May 2024 | October 2024 | Allow | 5 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18424644 | METHODS FOR PRESENTING AND SHARING CONTENT IN AN ENVIRONMENT | January 2024 | June 2025 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18408548 | ADAPTIVE CLOCK SIGNAL FREQUENCY SCALING | January 2024 | April 2025 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18563982 | CONTROL METHOD, CONTROL DEVICE AND STARTUP SWITCHING DEVICE FOR INTELLIGENT TERMINAL STARTUP | November 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18503319 | PEAK POWER MANAGEMENT EXTENSIONS TO APPLICATION-SPECIFIC INTEGRATED CIRCUITS | November 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18498757 | SPLIT RAIL POWER SUPPLY ARCHITECTURE | October 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18479412 | DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR COLLECTING DOWNHOLE MEASUREMENTS | October 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18375452 | DYNAMIC ENV SETTING SIGNATURE BY TWO-DIMENSIONAL RANDOM KEY | September 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18370108 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INTEGRATING BATTERIES TO MAINTAIN VOLATILE MEMORIES AND PROTECT THE VOLATILE MEMORIES FROM EXCESSIVE TEMPERATURES | September 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18469175 | POWER CONTROL APPARATUS AND METHOD | September 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18243659 | METHOD OF PERFORMING POWER SAVING CONTROL ON DISPLAY DEVICE AND RELATED DISPLAY DEVICE | September 2023 | December 2024 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18462829 | MULTI-NODE SYSTEM AND POWER SUPPLY CONTROL METHOD | September 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18239607 | ON-DEMAND AND SECURE HARDWARE LICENSE-BASED SKU CREATION FOR ASICS | August 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18276542 | METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR STARTING APPLICATION ON TARGET PLATFORM | August 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18363422 | METHOD FOR GENERATING AN EVIDENCE OF THE TIME ELAPSED BETWEEN EVENTS IN AN ASYNCHRONOUS NODE NETWORK | August 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18225980 | METHOD FOR CONTROLLING CLOCK OF CONTROLLER AND STORAGE SYSTEM | July 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18353790 | CURRENT CONTROL FOR A MULTICORE PROCESSOR | July 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18347632 | AUTONOMOUS POWER MANAGEMENT FOR SUSTAINABLE STORAGE | July 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18218443 | FEEDBACK FOR POWER MANAGEMENT OF A MEMORY DIE USING A DEDICATED PIN | July 2023 | December 2024 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18344470 | POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM FOR DETECTING A RAIL VIOLATION IN A MULTI-RAIL SEQUENCE | June 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18213628 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR QUADRATURE DELAY CLOCK GENERATION | June 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18213596 | PLATFORM POWER MANAGER FOR RACK LEVEL POWER AND THERMAL CONSTRAINTS | June 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18336188 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD FOR CONTROLLING INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, NON-TRANSITORY RECORDING MEDIUM STORING CONTROL TOOL, HOST DEVICE, NON-TRANSITORY RECORDING MEDIUM STORING PERFORMANCE EVALUATION TOOL, AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION METHOD FOR EXTERNAL MEMORY DEVICE | June 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18336174 | METHOD FOR SYSTEM SWITCHING, WEARABLE DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | June 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18335632 | CONNECTED PROVISIONING | June 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18205014 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND POWER OFF METHOD OF A SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE | June 2023 | December 2024 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18255064 | COMPUTER ORCHESTRATION | May 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18201135 | ENERGY EFFICIENT ETHERNET (EEE) OPERATION | May 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18198709 | MEMORY CALIBRATION SYSTEM AND METHOD | May 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18316609 | DATA PROCESSING ARRAY EVENT TRACE AND PROFILING USING PROCESSOR SYSTEM EXECUTED KERNELS | May 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18142491 | IMPROVED ENERGY EFFICIENT ETHERNET (EEE) OPERATION | May 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18307375 | REDUCED COMMON MODE VOLTAGE PULSE WIDTH MODULATION SWITCHING SCHEME WITH CAPACITOR VOLTAGE BALANCING FOR A MULTILEVEL POWER CONVERTER | April 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18299631 | Method and Apparatus for Determining Temperatures in an Electric Machine | April 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18193865 | BASEBOARD MANAGEMENT CONTROLLER POWER DELIVERY | March 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18029527 | OPERATING SYSTEM UPGRADE METHOD, DEVICE, STORAGE MEDIUM, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT | March 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 17 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18188582 | Real-Time Clock Module | March 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18122410 | WAKEUP CIRCUIT | March 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18184233 | COGNITIVE THERMAL AND POWER MANAGEMENT OF INFORMATION HANDLING SYSTEMS (IHSs) | March 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18119353 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE AN METHOD FOR OPERATING ELECTRONIC DEVICE | March 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18113497 | POWER SAVING IN A NETWORK DEVICE | February 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18111916 | Clock Adjustment Holdover | February 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18165855 | LOW OVERHEAD MESOCHRONOUS DIGITAL INTERFACE | February 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18103832 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATED DATA DRIVEN CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT | January 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18005535 | METHOD FOR DETERMINING CONFIGURATION PARAMETERS OF DATA PROCESSING DEVICE, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM | January 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18147989 | Synchronous Playback With Battery-Powered Playback Device | December 2022 | July 2024 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18086933 | DEVICE POWER CONTROLLER | December 2022 | July 2024 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17992406 | DYNAMIC POWER ALLOCATION FOR MEMORY USING MULTIPLE INTERLEAVING PATTERNS | November 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17741192 | SOLID-STATE DEVICE WITH MULTI-TIER EXTREME THERMAL THROTTLING | May 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17727766 | DISTRIBUTION OF BOOTSTRAP MANAGEMENT FOR APPLICATION MONITORING | April 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17691470 | POWER MANAGEMENT FOR SOLID STATE DRIVES IN A NETWORK | March 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 34 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17587120 | Multi-stage power supply signal conditioning | January 2022 | July 2024 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17559411 | Controlled Transition Between Configuration Mode and User Mode to Reduce Current-Resistance Voltage Drop | December 2021 | June 2025 | Allow | 41 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17558172 | METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND APPARATUS TO RECONFIGURE A COMPUTER | December 2021 | June 2025 | Allow | 41 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17550197 | POWER MANAGEMENT WATCHDOG | December 2021 | April 2025 | Allow | 40 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17390429 | ON-DEMAND IP INITIALIZATION WITHIN POWER STATES | July 2021 | April 2024 | Allow | 32 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 17358668 | DEVICE POSTURE-BASED PRE-BOOT DISPLAY ORIENTATION AND OTHER USAGE SUPPORT | June 2021 | December 2024 | Allow | 41 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17203571 | THERMAL MANAGEMENT IN HORIZONTALLY OR VERTICALLY STACKED DIES | March 2021 | November 2024 | Allow | 44 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16432384 | SENSOR PROCESSING METHOD OF MOBILE TERMINAL, STORAGE MEDIUM, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | June 2019 | April 2020 | Allow | 11 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15752084 | SERIAL PORT PIN VOLTAGES | February 2018 | April 2020 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15892649 | POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A MOBILE MEDICAL WORKSTATION | February 2018 | January 2020 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15747068 | PROCESSING METHOD AND DEVICE FOR SAVING POWER, MOBILE TERMINAL AND CLOUD SERVER | January 2018 | November 2019 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15856644 | TECHNOLOGIES FOR PROVIDING RUNTIME CODE IN AN OPTION ROM | December 2017 | April 2020 | Allow | 27 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15739875 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS | December 2017 | September 2019 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15578049 | METHOD OF SECURELY BOOTING A COMPUTER SYSTEM AND A COMPUTER SYSTEM | November 2017 | October 2019 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15610503 | LOW FREQUENCY POWER MANAGEMENT BUS | May 2017 | June 2019 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15484511 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM HAVING STORED THEREIN PROGRAM FOR SETTING CONNECTION INFORMATION | April 2017 | August 2019 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15128895 | INSTRUCTION OPTIMIZATION USING VOLTAGE-BASED FUNCTIONAL PERFORMANCE VARIATION | September 2016 | February 2019 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15271728 | REPROGRAMMING A FIELD PROGRAMMABLE DEVICE ON-DEMAND | September 2016 | April 2019 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15265052 | CONFIGURING FUNCTIONAL CAPABILITIES OF A COMPUTER SYSTEM | September 2016 | August 2018 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15118201 | COMMUNICATING COMMANDS TO AN EMBEDDED CONTROLLER OF A SYSTEM | August 2016 | August 2019 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15226636 | CORRELATING COMPUTING NETWORK EVENTS | August 2016 | July 2019 | Allow | 36 | 5 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 15211347 | CONFIGURING FUNCTIONAL CAPABILITIES OF A COMPUTER SYSTEM | July 2016 | September 2018 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14904556 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLING DISPLAY OF ELECTRONIC DEVICE | January 2016 | October 2019 | Allow | 45 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14815926 | CONFIGURATION COMMAND TEMPLATE CREATION ASSISTANT USING CROSS-MODEL ANALYSIS TO IDENTIFY COMMON SYNTAX AND SEMANTICS | July 2015 | July 2019 | Allow | 48 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14618257 | COMPLEX EVENT PROCESSING USING PSEUDO-CLOCK | February 2015 | April 2019 | Allow | 51 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13924676 | DYNAMIC CLOCK VOLTAGE SCALING (DCVS) BASED ON APPLICATION PERFORMANCE IN A SYSTEM-ON-A-CHIP (SOC), AND RELATED METHODS AND PROCESSOR-BASED SYSTEMS | June 2013 | April 2019 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner DEROSE, VOLVICK.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner DEROSE, VOLVICK works in Art Unit 2176 and has examined 73 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 21 months.
Examiner DEROSE, VOLVICK's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 98% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by DEROSE, VOLVICK receive 1.49 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 36% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by DEROSE, VOLVICK is 21 months. This places the examiner in the 84% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by DEROSE, VOLVICK. This interview benefit is in the 10% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 31.6% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 57% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 38.1% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 50% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 100.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 88% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 11% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 12% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.