Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18863255 | METHOD FOR POWERING ON SMART NETWORK INTERFACE CARD | November 2024 | February 2025 | Allow | 3 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18609884 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING POWER CONSUMPTION OF A DISTRIBUTED SYSTEM | March 2024 | January 2025 | Allow | 10 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18597462 | SHALLOW HIBERNATE POWER STATE | March 2024 | May 2025 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18595161 | NEURAL NETWORK INFERENCE CIRCUIT EMPLOYING DYNAMIC MEMORY SLEEP | March 2024 | June 2025 | Abandon | 15 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18522071 | Heterogeneous Computing Systems and Methods for Clock Synchronization | November 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18501586 | SYSTEMS AND TECHNIQUES FOR IMPROVING BATTERY LIFE IN AN ELECTROMECHANICAL GUN | November 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18500563 | SYSTEM ON CHIP CONTROLLING MEMORY POWER USING HANDSHAKE PROCESS AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF | November 2023 | December 2024 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18488992 | WAKE-UP MECHANISM CONTROLLING METHOD, ELECTRONIC SYSTEM, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM | October 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18555478 | ACTIVATION OF INTEGRATED GRAPHICAL PROCESSING UNITS | October 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18476508 | CLOCK DRIVER, OPERATING METHOD THEREOF, MEMORY DEVICE INCLUDING CLOCK DRIVER, AND MEMORY SYSTEM | September 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18475678 | DYNAMIC CURRENT SCALING OF A REGULATOR | September 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18472169 | MULTI-NODE COMPUTING SYSTEM | September 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18458339 | SELECTIVE DEACTIVATION OF PREDICTION CIRCUITRY | August 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18457485 | SINGLE CABLE OPTICAL DATA/POWER TRANSMISSION ETHERNET PORT ADAPTER SYSTEM | August 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18363462 | DYNAMIC POWER GRID FOR AUGMENTED REALITY (AR) GLASSES | August 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18360653 | SYSTEM CONTEXT-AWARE THIRD PARTY FIRMWARE SAFE ASSURANCE CONFIGURATION | July 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18223813 | ARCHITECTURE-BASED POWER MANAGEMENT FOR A MEMORY DEVICE | July 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 15 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18352542 | Two-Phase Deployment-Initiated Wakeup Mechanism For Body-Mountable Electronic Device | July 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 16 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18342789 | POWER MANAGEMENT OF OUT-OF-BAND (OOB) PROCESSORS IN HETEROGENEOUS COMPUTING PLATFORMS | June 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 18269841 | Energy-Saving Method for a Locking System | June 2023 | June 2025 | Abandon | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18331156 | APPROXIMATING ENERGY USE OF SOFTWARE EXECUTING ON VIRTUAL MACHINES | June 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 23 | 0 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 18328342 | Electronic System, Corresponding Method of Operation and Electronic Device | June 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18203596 | MEMORY SYSTEM AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOF AND POWER MANAGEMENT MODULE | May 2023 | December 2024 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18325830 | PROCESSOR RESTART USING FIRMWARE BOOT FROM VOLATILE MEMORY | May 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18323945 | LOW POWER STATE STAGING | May 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 16 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 18201749 | CHIP, SERIES POWER SUPPLY CIRCUIT, DATA PROCESSING DEVICE, AND COMPUTER SERVER | May 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 17 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18318038 | CIRCUIT WITH LOAD JUMP MITIGATION | May 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18312522 | SYSTEM AGNOSTIC AUTONOMOUS SYSTEM STATE MANAGEMENT | May 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 18140373 | CODE PATCHING FOR SYSTEM ON A CHIP | April 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18139939 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR PERFORMING CLOCK MANAGEMENT BY USING CLOCK COUNTERS ALLOCATED AT DIFFERENT POWER DOMAINS AND ASSOCIATED METHOD | April 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 18307518 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING CONTROLLER FOR SYSTEM BOOTING AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF | April 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18250417 | Power Supply Control Method, System and Device for Server | April 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18249876 | HILITE: HIERARCHICAL AND LIGHTWEIGHT IMITATION LEARNING FOR POWER MANAGEMENT OF EMBEDDED SOCS | April 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18134541 | POWER CONSUMPTION CONTROL DEVICE APPLIED TO ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND ASSOCIATED METHOD | April 2023 | December 2024 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18123931 | RECOVERING MECHANICAL ENERGY FROM DATA STORAGE DEVICES | March 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 17 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18183370 | PROCESSOR POWER CONSUMPTION CONTROL METHOD, SYSTEM, AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS | March 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18180462 | POWER GOVERNANCE OF PROCESSING UNIT | March 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 17 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 18043872 | Hardware-Based Save-and-Restore Controller | March 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18172032 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING PERIPHERAL DEVICE SETTINGS BASED UPON CONTEXT USING HETEROGENEOUS COMPUTING PLATFORMS | February 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18157080 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD | January 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18068183 | POWER MANAGEMENT OF A NETWORK DEVICE | December 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18080582 | TECHNIQUE FOR IMPROVING POWER STATE TRANSITION LATENCY FOR COMPUTING DEVICE | December 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 30 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18074524 | Methods and Apparatus for Adaptive Power Profiling in A Baseband Processing System | December 2022 | August 2024 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17928901 | Cloud Computing Power Allocation Method, User Terminal, Cloud Computing Power Platform and System | November 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17980859 | LOW-POWER COMPOSTING MONITOR | November 2022 | August 2024 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17961524 | DYNAMIC VOLTAGE AND FREQUENCY SCALING FOR DISCRETE GRAPHICS SYSTEMS | October 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17948536 | Device for Low-power Acceleration Detection in a Telematics Device | September 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 27 | 0 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17818670 | SYSTEM, METHOD AND/OR APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLING A POWER SIGNAL | August 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 32 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17724811 | SYSTEM MANAGEMENT MODE (SMM) ERROR HANDLER | April 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 38 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17708453 | Core Activation and Deactivation for a Multi-Core Processor | March 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 32 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17686976 | CORE STATUS MANAGEMENT AT POWER FAILURE | March 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 37 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17558564 | FINE-GRAINED BITCOIN ENGINE DEACTIVATION FOR YIELD RECOVERY, PERFORMANCE, AND/OR POWER MANAGEMENT | December 2021 | February 2025 | Allow | 37 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17490290 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR STABLE AND ELEVATED IDLE-MODE TEMPERATURE FOR ASSEMBLED SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES | September 2021 | November 2024 | Allow | 38 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17381270 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CLOCK SYNCHRONIZATION AND TIME TRANSFER BETWEEN QUANTUM ORCHESTRATION PLATFORM ELEMENTS | July 2021 | February 2025 | Allow | 43 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 16800424 | Multi-Interface Transponder Device - Power Management | February 2020 | February 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 16246303 | HARDWARE STRUCTURE OF A TRUSTED COMPUTER AND TRUSTED BOOTING METHOD FOR A COMPUTER | January 2019 | July 2020 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16158190 | TECHNIQUES AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING ACTIVITY IN MULTICOMPONENT PLATFORM | October 2018 | April 2020 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 16156180 | RACK LEVEL SERVER BOOT | October 2018 | February 2020 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15995673 | DETERMINATION OF A ZERO WATT STATE FOR IMPLEMENTATION | June 2018 | May 2020 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15976273 | CONTROLLING SYSTEM CLOCKS IN VIRTUAL MACHINES | May 2018 | May 2019 | Allow | 13 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15976237 | CONTROLLING SYSTEM CLOCKS IN VIRTUAL MACHINES | May 2018 | May 2019 | Allow | 13 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15772253 | COMMUNICATION SYSTEM AND COMMUNICATION METHOD | April 2018 | April 2020 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15934760 | MECHANISMS FOR BOOTING A COMPUTING DEVICE AND PROGRAMMABLE CIRCUIT | March 2018 | February 2020 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15909083 | WORKLOAD PREDICTION BASED CPU FREQUENCY SCALING | March 2018 | October 2019 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15575852 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONFIGURING A MICROCONTROLLER SYSTEM | November 2017 | October 2019 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15784149 | SYNCHRONIZING SETTINGS ASSOCIATED WITH VIRTUAL COMPUTING ENVIRONMENTS | October 2017 | September 2019 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15697565 | STATIC IMAGE RAM DRIVE | September 2017 | February 2019 | Allow | 17 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15516332 | DISREGARDING INPUT IN WAKE-ON-LAN BOOT | March 2017 | February 2019 | Allow | 23 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15419293 | NO-OPERATION POWER STATE COMMAND | January 2017 | October 2018 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15420008 | DATACENTER POWER MANAGEMENT OPTIMIZATIONS | January 2017 | May 2019 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15274789 | IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, METHOD FOR CONTROLLING IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | September 2016 | February 2019 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 13660772 | INTEGRATED CIRCUIT HAVING FREQUENCY DEPENDENT NOISE AVOIDANCE | October 2012 | April 2013 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13617132 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS CAPABLE OF BEING INSTRUCTED TO POWER OFF BY A COMMAND FROM EXTERNAL APPARATUS, METHOD OF CONTROLLING THE SAME, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | September 2012 | April 2013 | Allow | 7 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13400766 | MOTHERBOARD WITH VOLTAGE-STATE DISPLAY SYSTEM | February 2012 | March 2014 | Allow | 25 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 13339284 | METHOD, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEM FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND ENERGY CONSERVATION INCLUDING OPTIMIZING C-STATE SELECTION UNDER VARIABLE WAKEUP RATES | December 2011 | March 2014 | Allow | 27 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13080079 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR FINE EDGE CONTROL ON INTEGRATED CIRCUIT OUTPUTS | April 2011 | June 2013 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13048896 | PREBOOT EXECUTION ENVIRONMENT TEST DEVICE AND METHOD | March 2011 | May 2013 | Allow | 26 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 13048232 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF | March 2011 | December 2012 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 13036050 | POWER PROTECTION SYSTEM FOR POWER SUPPLY | February 2011 | June 2013 | Allow | 28 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 13031622 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE HAVING POWER CONSUMPTION ADJUSTING FEATURE | February 2011 | June 2013 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13057023 | TRACING APPARATUS AND TRACING SYSTEM | February 2011 | March 2013 | Allow | 26 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 12959160 | System, apparatus, and method for initiating a reboot of a personal computer system by pressing a button on an attached storage device and causing the operating system on the attached storage device to be booted | December 2010 | February 2014 | Allow | 38 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12857851 | METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS FOR SELECTING A RESOURCE BASED ON A MEASURE OF A PROCESSING COST | August 2010 | February 2014 | Allow | 42 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12838667 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR REDUCING THE STANDBY POWER CONSUMPTION OF A DISPLAY, AND DISPLAY WITH LOW STANDBY POWER CONSUMPTION | July 2010 | July 2013 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12839333 | SEMICONDUCTOR INTEGRATED CIRCUIT | July 2010 | March 2013 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12817907 | SYSTEM FOR CONTROLLING POWER CONSUMPTION OF A NETWORK | June 2010 | December 2012 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12688214 | DYNAMICALLY ADJUSTING AN OPERATING STATE OF A DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM RUNNING UNDER A POWER CAP | January 2010 | September 2012 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12632797 | TURNING OFF CLOCK TO FLIP FLOPS | December 2009 | August 2012 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12497714 | POWER SUPPLY CONVERTING CIRCUIT | July 2009 | January 2012 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12406833 | PORTABLE ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DISPLAYING IMAGE | March 2009 | February 2013 | Allow | 47 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 12405353 | POWER ADJUSTMENT BASED ON COMPLETION TIMES IN A PARALLEL COMPUTING SYSTEM | March 2009 | October 2011 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12404599 | PORTABLE TERMINAL DEVICE | March 2009 | February 2012 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12346675 | DOMAIN CROSSING CIRCUIT OF A SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY APPARATUS | December 2008 | September 2011 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12210719 | COMPUTER APPARATUS, STORAGE APPARATUS, SYSTEM MANAGEMENT APPARATUS, AND HARD DISK UNIT POWER SUPPLY CONTROLLING METHOD | September 2008 | September 2009 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 12166182 | UPDATE IN-USE FLASH MEMORY WITHOUT EXTERNAL INTERFACES | July 2008 | May 2011 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12069816 | REMOTE PROCESSOR REPROGRAMMING | February 2008 | August 2011 | Allow | 42 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12004593 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ON-DEMAND POWER MANAGEMENT | December 2007 | March 2010 | Allow | 27 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12004707 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ON-DEMAND POWER MANAGEMENT | December 2007 | December 2009 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 11872017 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETECTING COMPONENT REMOVAL WHILE OPERATING IN A BATTERY BACKUP MODE | October 2007 | January 2011 | Allow | 40 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11905643 | ELECTRONIC SYSTEM WITH NAND FLASH MEMORY STORING BOOT CODE AND HIGHLY RELIABLE BOOT UP METHOD | October 2007 | November 2010 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner STOYNOV, STEFAN.
With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 40.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner STOYNOV, STEFAN works in Art Unit 2175 and has examined 153 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 98.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 29 months.
Examiner STOYNOV, STEFAN's allowance rate of 98.0% places them in the 94% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by STOYNOV, STEFAN receive 1.03 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 14% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by STOYNOV, STEFAN is 29 months. This places the examiner in the 45% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +3.1% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by STOYNOV, STEFAN. This interview benefit is in the 23% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 43.5% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 94% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 62.1% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 84% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 200.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 93% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. Before filing a full appeal brief, strongly consider requesting a PAC. The PAC provides an opportunity for the examiner and supervisory personnel to reconsider the rejection before the case proceeds to the PTAB.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 66.7% of appeals filed. This is in the 43% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 25.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 83.3% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 93% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 22.9% of allowed cases (in the 99% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 12.0% of allowed cases (in the 89% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.