Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18817379 | DEVICE FOR OPERATION IN A NETWORK, AUTOMATION SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPERATING THE AUTOMATION SYSTEM | August 2024 | December 2024 | Allow | 3 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18211369 | FALLING CLOCK EDGE JTAG BUS ROUTERS | June 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 23 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 18210376 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD FOR CONTROLLING INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | June 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18206814 | POWER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | June 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18326420 | INTEGRATED CIRCUIT WITH MULTIFUNCTION CAPABILITY | May 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18310519 | Power Efficient Computer and Display for Use in a Power-Over-Ethernet System | May 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18303944 | TECHNIQUES FOR MOUNTING DISKS IN AN INSPECTION ENVIRONMENT | April 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18131352 | Power Management System and Method for Operating Multiple High-Powered Components Using a Single Power-Over-Ethernet Cable Connection | April 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18126495 | MOVABLE MINING MACHINES WITH DYNAMICALLY ADJUSTABLE COMPUTING POWER | March 2023 | April 2025 | Abandon | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18246131 | Power Supply Method and System, Computer Apparatus, and Non-transitory Storage Medium | March 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18116394 | DRIVE BOX | March 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18000319 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ADAPTIVE POWER MULTIPLEXING | November 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18000341 | SURGE RECOVERY WITH PROCESSOR POWER CONTROL | November 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17990309 | METHODS AND APPARATUS TO IMPLEMENT ALWAYS-ON CONTEXT SENSOR HUBS FOR PROCESSING MULTIPLE DIFFERENT TYPES OF DATA INPUTS | November 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17899523 | NEURAL NETWORK POWER MANAGEMENT IN A MULTI-GPU SYSTEM | August 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 29 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17858270 | ENHANCED SERVICE OPERATING SYSTEM CAPABILITIES THROUGH EMBEDDED CONTROLLER SYSTEM HEALTH STATE TRACKING | July 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17846947 | TECHNOLOGIES FOR PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT WITH EMPTY POLLING | June 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 36 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17785563 | METHOD FOR STARTING A SYSTEM-ON-A-CHIP WITHOUT READ ONLY MEMORY, SYSTEM ON-A-CHIP WITHOUT READ ONLY MEMORY AND HEADPHONE | June 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17830261 | TECHNIQUES FOR BOOTSTRAPPING ACROSS SECURE AIR GAPS WITH STATIC SIDECAR | June 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17715288 | PROVISIONING DPU MANAGEMENT OPERATING SYSTEMS USING HOST AND DPU BOOT COORDINATION | April 2022 | August 2024 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17764061 | METHOD FOR STARTING-UP A DEVICE WITH AN EMBEDDED MULTIMEDIA CARD (EMMC) | March 2022 | August 2024 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17687217 | POWER MANAGEMENT ADVISOR TO SUPPORT POWER MANAGEMENT CONTROL | March 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 38 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17566658 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SUPPORTING CHASSIS LEVEL KEEP ALIVE IN NVME-OF BASED SYSTEM | December 2021 | January 2025 | Allow | 36 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17399031 | MANAGEMENT OF NEAR FIELD COMMUNICATIONS USING A LOW POWER EXPRESS MODE OF AN ELECTRONIC DEVICE | August 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 38 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17366423 | SYSTEM-WIDE LOW POWER MANAGEMENT | July 2021 | May 2025 | Allow | 47 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15647378 | ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MANAGING POWER SUPPLY | July 2017 | August 2019 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15461195 | POWER REDUCTION VIA MEMORY EFFICIENCY COMPENSATION | March 2017 | February 2020 | Allow | 35 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15453945 | SELECTIVELY UPLOADING APPLICATIONS TO A MOBILE DEVICE BASED ON POWER CONSUMPTION | March 2017 | July 2018 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15255176 | ULTRA-LOW-POWER DESIGN MEMORY POWER REDUCTION SCHEME | September 2016 | September 2019 | Allow | 37 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 14869844 | VALIDATION OF STORAGE ARRAYS BASED ON INFORMATION STORED IN GLOBAL METADATA | September 2015 | June 2018 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14469697 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE | August 2014 | September 2018 | Allow | 49 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13613936 | MULTICORE PROCESSOR AND METHOD OF USE THAT ADAPTS CORE FUNCTIONS BASED ON WORKLOAD EXECUTION | September 2012 | August 2013 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13361291 | FAST AND COMPACT CIRCUIT FOR BUS INVERSION | January 2012 | December 2013 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13032472 | ADAPTIVE REAL-TIME METHODOLOGY FOR OPTIMIZING ENERGY-EFFICIENT COMPUTING | February 2011 | September 2012 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12749179 | ON-CHIP POWER PROXY BASED ARCHITECTURE | March 2010 | March 2013 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12591813 | POWER-SAVING MANAGEMENT METHOD FOR COMPUTER PERIPHERAL DEVICE AND SYSTEM THEREOF | December 2009 | October 2013 | Allow | 46 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12424527 | COMPUTER SYSTEM AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF | April 2009 | January 2012 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12344251 | METHOD FOR CHANGING POWER STATES OF A COMPUTER | December 2008 | July 2011 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12343491 | STORAGE MEDIUM FOR STORING POWER CONSUMPTION MONITOR PROGRAM, POWER CONSUMPTION MONITOR APPARATUS AND POWER CONSUMPTION MONITOR METHOD | December 2008 | February 2012 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12197314 | ESTIMATING POWER CONSUMPTION IN A COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT | August 2008 | December 2011 | Allow | 40 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12045855 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR A PLATFORM LEVEL DATA MODEL AND MESSAGES FOR TRANSFERRING SMBIOS STRUCTURES AND DATA | March 2008 | September 2012 | Allow | 55 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12044512 | DYNAMICALLY UPDATING BARCODE DATA | March 2008 | June 2011 | Allow | 40 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12038173 | METHOD FOR OPERATING TV TUNER CARD | February 2008 | March 2011 | Allow | 36 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 11970613 | NETWORK PROCESSOR POWER MANAGEMENT | January 2008 | July 2008 | Allow | 6 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11833345 | METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR AUTOMATIC SYSTEM PARAMETER CONFIGURATION FOR PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT | August 2007 | October 2008 | Allow | 14 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11556651 | ADAPTIVE REAL-TIME METHODOLOGY FOR OPTIMIZING ENERGY-EFFICIENT COMPUTING | November 2006 | November 2010 | Allow | 49 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11495964 | MEMORY MODULES HAVING ACCURATE OPERATING PARAMETERS STORED THEREON AND METHODS FOR FABRICATING AND IMPLEMENTING SUCH DEVICES | July 2006 | September 2008 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11453644 | STORAGE AND ACCESS CONTROL METHOD FOR STORAGE | June 2006 | December 2009 | Allow | 42 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11448748 | FAST AND COMPACT CIRCUIT FOR BUS INVERSION | June 2006 | October 2008 | Allow | 29 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 11377073 | ESTIMATING SOFTWARE POWER CONSUMPTION | March 2006 | January 2009 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10849771 | REDUCTION OF POWER CONSUMPTION IN ELECTRICAL DEVICES | May 2004 | September 2008 | Allow | 51 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10849357 | METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR AUTOMATIC SYSTEM PARAMETER CONFIGURATION FOR PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT | May 2004 | May 2007 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10814299 | SETUP SUPPORT SYSTEM, PHYSICAL ACCESS DRIVER, AND SETUP SUPPORT METHOD | April 2004 | July 2007 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10800662 | PRINTING APPARATUS AND POWER SUPPLY CONTROL METHOD IN PRINTING APPARATUS | March 2004 | July 2008 | Allow | 52 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10771435 | FAST AND COMPACT CIRCUIT FOR BUS INVERSION | February 2004 | March 2008 | Allow | 50 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10713720 | FIRMWARE EMULATION ENVIRONMENT FOR DEVELOPING, DEBUGGING, AND TESTING FIRMWARE COMPONENTS INCLUDING OPTION ROMS | November 2003 | September 2007 | Allow | 46 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10699909 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR WAVEFORM SAMPLING | November 2003 | November 2008 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10674397 | POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SUPPLYING POWER TO CPU PROVIDING POWER SAVING MODE | October 2003 | April 2008 | Allow | 55 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10667790 | POWER CONTROL OF REMOTE APPARATUS VIA NETWORK | September 2003 | January 2008 | Allow | 52 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 10637823 | METHOD AND CONTROL APPARATUS FOR ASSIGNING ID NUMBERS TO IDE DEVICE | August 2003 | February 2006 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10461667 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROTECTING ADVANCED CONFIGURATION AND POWER INTERFACE CODE FROM DRIVER ATTACHMENT | June 2003 | September 2006 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10367067 | NETWORK PROCESSOR POWER MANAGEMENT | February 2003 | October 2007 | Allow | 56 | 5 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 10335319 | METHOD AND CONTROL APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLING STARTUP OF MULTIPLE IDE_HDDS | December 2002 | August 2006 | Allow | 43 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10032762 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF REMOTELY INITIALIZING A LOCAL PROCESSOR | December 2001 | June 2007 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 0 | No | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner RAHMAN, FAHMIDA.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner RAHMAN, FAHMIDA works in Art Unit 2175 and has examined 63 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 98.4%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 33 months.
Examiner RAHMAN, FAHMIDA's allowance rate of 98.4% places them in the 95% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by RAHMAN, FAHMIDA receive 2.24 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 76% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by RAHMAN, FAHMIDA is 33 months. This places the examiner in the 27% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +7.1% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by RAHMAN, FAHMIDA. This interview benefit is in the 37% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 31.9% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 58% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 43.8% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 60% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 100.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 88% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 23.8% of allowed cases (in the 99% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 6.5% of allowed cases (in the 82% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.