Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19001546 | SERVER INTERRUPT OPERATION EXECUTION METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM | December 2024 | March 2025 | Allow | 3 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18523819 | Systems and Methods for Coherent Power Management | November 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18489319 | BI-DIRECTIONAL POWER OVER ETHERNET FOR DIGITAL BUILDING APPLICATIONS | October 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18448475 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES AND SEMICONDUCTOR SYSTEMS RELATED TO SYNCHRONIZATION BETWEEN CLOCKS | August 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18232714 | CONCURRENT IMAGE MEASUREMENT AND EXECUTION | August 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18230726 | METHOD FOR PACKAGING DRIVER KERNEL MODULE, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM | August 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18364279 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DIVE MASKS WITH REMOTE DISPLAYS | August 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 21 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18272895 | TERMINAL DEVICE AND CHARGING METHOD | July 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18329462 | REDUCED TRAINING FOR MAIN BAND CHIP MODULE INTERCONNECTION CLOCK LINES | June 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18204248 | MACHINE CAPABILITY MODEL FOR SELF-CONFIGURABLE APPLICATIONS | May 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18319694 | FACILITATING SEPARATELY-SOURCED REDUNDANT POWER FEEDS TO A SYSTEM | May 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18308334 | POWER MANAGEMENT METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE USING SAME | April 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18297128 | POWER RESET, AND ASSOCIATED CIRCUITRY, DEVICES, SYSTEMS, MOBILE UNITS, AND METHODS | April 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18248054 | INTEGRATED APPLICATION PERFORMANCE AND INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT | April 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18150547 | MOBILE SERVICE APPLICATIONS | January 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18084669 | POWER SUPPLY CONTROL METHOD | December 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18072612 | ELECTRONIC SYSTEM USING USB TYPE-C PORT AND ABNORMAL ELIMINATION METHOD THEREOF | November 2022 | March 2025 | Abandon | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17927871 | PROVIDING LOCAL COMPUTING CAPACITY FOR AN EDGE CLOUD | November 2022 | March 2025 | Abandon | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18052061 | SIGNAL SYNTHESIZER CIRCUIT, SIGNAL GENERATOR DEVICE, AND SIGNAL SYNTHESIS METHOD | November 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17973047 | CHIP FREQUENCY MODULATION METHOD AND APPARATUS OF COMPUTING DEVICE, HASH BOARD, COMPUTING DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM | October 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18049523 | APPARATUS FOR ANALYZING NON-INFORMATIVE FIRMWARE AND METHOD USING THE SAME | October 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17972332 | INTELLIGENT OFFLOAD OF MEMORY INTENSIVE LOG DATA | October 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17968048 | Large-Scale Accelerator System Energy Performance Optimization | October 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17940723 | POWER CONTROL CIRCUIT AND CONTROL METHOD | September 2022 | February 2025 | Abandon | 29 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17802362 | POWER MANAGEMENT CIRCUITRY | August 2022 | February 2025 | Abandon | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17839711 | AUTOMATED EPHEMERAL CONTEXT-AWARE DEVICE PROVISIONING | June 2022 | August 2024 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17836690 | DATA COMMUNICATION SERVICE IN A TRUSTED EXECUTION ENVIRONMENT (TEE) AT THE NETWORK EDGE | June 2022 | August 2024 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17755490 | IN-VEHICLE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, IN-VEHICLE COMMUNICATION DEVICE, AND VEHICLE COMMUNICATION METHOD | April 2022 | February 2025 | Abandon | 34 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17729791 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REMOTE POWER MANAGEMENT OF A COMMUNICATION INFRASTRUCTURE DEVICE | April 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 31 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17690411 | ADJUSTABLE CLOCK PHASE FOR PEAK-CURRENT REDUCTION | March 2022 | March 2025 | Abandon | 36 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17299906 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, WEARABLE DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | June 2021 | August 2024 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17188050 | APPARATUS AND METHOD TO DETERMINE END OF LIFE OF BATTERY POWERED SURGICAL INSTRUMENT | March 2021 | October 2024 | Allow | 43 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17250509 | DEVICE AND METHOD FOR RESTORING APPLICATION REMOVED BY FACTORY DATA RESET FUNCTION | January 2021 | June 2024 | Allow | 41 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17131533 | POWER MANAGEMENT FOR UNIVERSAL SERIAL BUS (USB) TYPE-C PORT | December 2020 | October 2024 | Allow | 46 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16379922 | REDUCING THERMAL CYCLING FATIGUE | April 2019 | January 2020 | Allow | 10 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15748414 | DETECTION CIRCUITS | January 2018 | November 2019 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15684999 | MPS GENERATION SYSTEM AND METHOD | August 2017 | July 2019 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15453991 | Deriving Optimal Actions from a Random Forest Model | March 2017 | February 2019 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15405850 | REDUCING THERMAL CYCLING FATIGUE | January 2017 | March 2019 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15096965 | MANAGING AN OPERATING SYSTEM TO SET UP A COMPUTER ASSOCIATION TOOL | April 2016 | May 2019 | Allow | 37 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12211588 | DEVICE FOR CONFIGURING FUNCTIONAL CAPABILITIES IN A DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM | September 2008 | December 2011 | Allow | 39 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12035511 | PIPELINING HARDWARE ACCELERATORS TO COMPUTER SYSTEMS | February 2008 | April 2012 | Allow | 50 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner PRIFTI, AUREL works in Art Unit 2175 and has examined 41 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 85.4%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 25 months.
Examiner PRIFTI, AUREL's allowance rate of 85.4% places them in the 57% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by PRIFTI, AUREL receive 1.44 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 33% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by PRIFTI, AUREL is 25 months. This places the examiner in the 65% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +9.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by PRIFTI, AUREL. This interview benefit is in the 43% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 45.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 95% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 20.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 17% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 10% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 12% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.