Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18988689 | DATA SENDING METHOD AND APPARATUS, DATA RECEIVING METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | December 2024 | June 2025 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18612953 | POLICER SYNCHRONIZATION ACROSS MULTIPLE PIPELINES IN A DPU | March 2024 | July 2025 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18444346 | METHOD OF AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING POWER CONSUMPTION OF A DEVICE | February 2024 | June 2025 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18489266 | COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | October 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18356055 | POWER-ON-RESET REQUEST FUNCTIONALITY IN SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES AND POWER MANAGEMENT ICS | July 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18342775 | OUT-OF-BAND NETWORKING FOR HETEROGENEOUS COMPUTING PLATFORMS IN LOW-POWER STATES | June 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18204772 | Synchronizing Client Device with Independent Sensor | June 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18320701 | CLOCK DISTRIBUTION NETWORK, AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND SEMICONDUCTOR SYSTEM INCLUDING THE CLOCK DISTRIBUTION NETWORK | May 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18307010 | Silicon-Agnostic Sensor Hub Abstraction | April 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17273328 | SENSING AUDIO INFORMATION AND FOOTSTEPS TO CONTROL POWER | March 2021 | March 2025 | Abandon | 49 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner HUYNH, KIM NGOC works in Art Unit 2175 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 0.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 49 months.
Examiner HUYNH, KIM NGOC's allowance rate of 0.0% places them in the 0% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by HUYNH, KIM NGOC receive 3.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 86% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by HUYNH, KIM NGOC is 49 months. This places the examiner in the 6% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 0.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 0% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 12% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.